Outcome of children with
community acquired pneumonia treated with injection crystalline
penicillin a prospective study
K Udaya 1, Murteli V.K.B 2
1Dr Udaya K, Senior Resident, Department Of Paediatrics, Koppal
Institute of Medical Sciences, Koppal, Karnataka, 2Dr
Vijaykumar B. Murteli, Assistant Professor, Department Of Paediatrics,
Belagavi Institute of Medical Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
Address for
Correspondence: Dr Udaya K, Senior Resident, Department
Of Paediatrics, Koppal Institute of Medical Sciences, Koppal,
Karnataka, India, Email- uday.bmc@gmail.com
Abstract
Objective:
To study the outcome of children hospitalized with community acquired
pneumonia treated with aqueous penicillin G. Design: Prospective
study. Setting:
The study was conducted in Belagavi Institute of Medical Sciences, a
referral hospital during 2014-2015. Children aged from more than 2
months to 18yrs of age were studied. Total of 84 children who met the
inclusion criteria were studied. Eligible children were given injection
crystalline penicillin 2 lakh IU/kg in four divided doses after drug
sensitivity testing. Children were assessed every 12th hourly, for
respiratory rate, pulse rate, blood pressure and signs of respiratory
distress. In case of worsening of symptoms, persistence of tachynpea,
fever, till 48 hours, antibiotic was changed. The study was conducted
to know the proportion of children with community acquired pneumonia
who responded to crystalline penicillin injection. Results: Out of 84
children treated with crystalline penicillin 79 responded, antibiotic
was changed for the other 5 children. 3 boys out of 48 and 2 girls out
of 36 did not respond to crystalline penicillin. 2 out of 24 children
in the age group of 2-12 months, 3 out of 33 in the 1-5 yrs, did not
respond to crystalline penicillin. Persistence of tachypnea at the end
of 48 hours was the indication for change of change of antibiotics in 5
children. No adverse outcome was noted. The mean duration of stay in
the hospital among the studied children was 7days
(6.93±1.28). Conclusion:
Injection crystalline penicillin effectively cures and is apt to be
used as a first line antibiotic in treating hospitalized children with
community acquired pneumonia.
Manuscript received: 24th
July 2016, Reviewed:
4th August 2016
Author Corrected;
14th August 2016,
Accepted for Publication: 28th August 2016
Introduction
Acute respiratory infection is one of the leading causes of morbidity
and mortality in children under 5 years of age in developing countries,
and is responsible for an estimated 1.2 million deaths worldwide in
this age group every year [1]. There is increasing concern about the
problem of antimicrobial resistance which is related to the amount of
antibiotics used [2]. Since Streptococcus pneumoniae is the major cause
of CAP in developing countries and in India, pneumococci have a very
low incidence (1.3%) of resistance to penicillin [3], it can be used as
the first line antibiotic in CAP. Other beta lactam antibiotics like
third generation cephalosporins are empirically being used in
developing country like India, as recommended by different medical
society [4,5]. However, there are limited studies done in recent past
in India to know the relevance of using basic antibiotic like
crystalline penicillin in treatment of CAP in the present era of
antibiotic resistance. Hence this study has been proposed to know the
outcome of children hospitalized with community acquired pneumonia
treated with aqueous penicillin G.
Methodology
This was a prospective study done on children admitted with community
acquired pneumonia at Belagavi Institute of Medical Sciences, Belagavi,
Karnataka a teaching hospital. The patient population comprises, mainly
of low income group from rural areas, urban slums, referred patients
from surrounding rural areas, private clinics. This study was
undertaken during December 2013 to March 2015. Children aged more than
2 months to 18yrs of age were studied, who met the inclusion criteria
of fever and cough for duration of less than 14 days with any one of
the following like, tachypnea, chest indrawing, poor feeding, no
response to appropriate oral antibiotics, toxic appearance, any of the
auscultatory findings like, crepitation/bronchial breath sounds/reduced
breath sounds, radiologically proven pneumonia- pulmonary infiltrates,
as in case of mild or moderate disease, the radiographical
difference between bacterial and viral causes of pneumonia does not
exist [6]. Children with chronic lung disease, human immunodeficiency
virus infection, underlying cardiac diseases, bronchial asthma, those
with previous enrolment in study and children with documented evidence
of intravenous antibiotics administration for more than 24 hours were
excluded.
The purpose of the study was explained and written consent was obtained
from the parents of the children before enrolling into study. A
predesigned proforma was used to collect information regarding age,
sex, socio demographic profile, presenting complaints like duration of
fever, cough, hurried breathing, chest indrawing, and decreased
feeding, lethargy and convulsions.
Relevant past and family history were also taken. Birth history which
included term/preterm, birth weight was documented. Eligible children
were given injection crystalline penicillin 2 lakh IU/kg in four
divided doses after drug sensitivity testing. Children were assessed
every 12th hourly, for respiratory rate, pulse rate, blood pressure and
signs of respiratory distress. In case the child
deteriorates, or if tachynpea or fever persists for more than 48 hours,
antibiotic was changed.
Complete general physical examination, systemic examination with
special orientation towards respiratory system like Respiratory Rate,
SpO2,capillary refilling time, chest indrawing, stridor, grunting,
crepitations, rhonchi were noted. Routine and relevant investigations
such as Hemoglobin%, Total leukocyte count, Erythrocyte sedimentation
rate, blood culture and chest X-ray were done. Any adverse effect after
drug administration was noted.
Results
Total of 84 children were studied, 48 boys and 36 girls. There were 24
children in the age group of 2-24 months, 33 in 1 to 5 years and 22
children aged between 5 and 18 years.Maximum number of children was in
low socioeconomic group(43 in upper lower and 37 in lower group)
according to modified kuppuswamy classification. Passive smoking was
present in 40.5 % of studied and overcrowding was seen in 51% of
children studied. 44% children were breastfed for less than six months.
|
Responders
|
Non responders
|
Percentage
|
2-12
MONTH
|
24
|
2
|
7.69
|
1-5 YRS
|
33
|
3
|
8.33
|
>5 YRS
|
22
|
0
|
0
|
TOTAL
|
79
|
5
|
5.95
|
Majority of them (77.6%) presented within 4 days of onset of fever and
cough, and most of them (96.5%) by 5th day.Out of 84 children treated
with crystalline penicillin 79 responded (92.94%), antibiotic was
changed for rest 5 children 3 boys out of 48 and 2 girls out of 36 did
not respond to crystalline penicillin. 2 out of 24 children in the age
group of 2-12 months, and 3 out of 33 in the 1-5 years group did not
respond to crystalline penicillin. Persistence of tachypnea at the end
of 48 hours was the indication for change of antibiotics in 5 children
along with persistence of fever in one child.
Discussion
In India, the incidence of pneumonia is estimated to be 44 million,
where as 7 million in Pakistan and 6 million
Bangladesh [7]. Cough and fever were the most common presenting
clinical features of pneumonia in our study. Fever and cough followed
by rapid or difficulty
in breathing were the most common
presenting complaints in a similar study done in Himachal
Pradesh, India [8]. The combination of tachypnea, tachycardia, fever,
and localized findings (rales or wheezing) both before and after
bronchodilator therapy identified pneumonia in 95% of children
>1 year of age with the first episode of wheezing [9].
Similarly, the most common presenting complaints of
pneumonia were cough (99.2%), fever (97.2%)
and difficulty in breathing
(56.5%) in a study done in 154
hospitalized children aged more
than two months with CAP,the examination
findings were tachypnea (75.2%), fever (49.7%) and crackles (33.8%)
[10].
All these show that fever, cough and tachypnea can
be used as the
diagnostic tool for pneumonia
where chest X-ray is not
always possible, especially in
rural and under equipped health settings. Since most of the
causative agents of childhood pneumonia cannot be
detected, antibiotic treatment
is most often empiric,
especially in underdeveloped
countries. Various antibiotics are
being used in the
treatment protocol of CAP
worldwide [11,12] and also
in India. In our study, the data showed that CP
successfully treated the great majority (94.04%) of the children aged
between 2 months to 18yrs with CAP. These results
are also similar to the study, where
Penicillin G successfully
treated 82% (126/154) of the study group
and the improvement was markedly seen on the
first day of treatment
itself in the retrospective
cohort study done in
hospitalized children with CAP
in Brazil 10]. Similarly, out
of 153 children hospitalized
for uncomplicated CAP in Finland,
66% were treated with
penicillin G and they also showed a rapid and uneventful recovery [13].
Penicillin G is still considered a drug of choice in hospitalized
children with CAP even in many European countries with low penicillin
resistance of pneumococci [14,15,16]. Penicillin G is no longer
recommended in the United States as the choice drug
because of limited supply
and the increasing resistance
of pneumococci to penicillin, [17]
whereas in western countries
like Finland, 95% of
pneumococcal strains still remained
sensitive to penicillin [18]. Since a
majority of children with CAP
responded significantly well to CP in our study, it could
still be considered a drug of choice in hospitalized children with CAP
in low income and resource poor countries like India.
Conclusions
Crystalline Penicillin is a very good drug for the treatment of CAP and
can still be used as the first drug in the treatment of children with
CAP. The most common clinical features like cough,
fever, tachypnoea and lower
chest indrawing can be used
in the diagnosis of
CAP where chest X-ray
facilities are absent. This study however
had limitation, as sample size was relatively small.
Funding:
Nil, Conflict of
interest: Nil
Permission from IRB:
Yes
References
1. Levels and Trends in Child Mortality: Report 2012, UNICEF, New York,
2012.
2. Goossens H, Sprenger MJ. Community acquired infections and bacterial
resistance. BMJ. 1998 Sep 5;317(7159):654-7. [PubMed]
3. Mehta PN. Choosing antibiotics for community acquired pneumonia.
Indian Pediatr. 2003 Oct;40(10):958-64. [PubMed]
4. Jadavji T, Law B, Lebel MH, Kennedy WA, Gold R, Wang EE. A practical
guide for the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric pneumonia. CMAJ.
1997 Mar 1;156(5):S703-11. [PubMed]
5. British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee. British
Thoracic Society Guidelines for the Management of Community Acquired
Pneumonia in Childhood. Thorax. 2002 May;57 Suppl 1:i1-24. [PubMed]
6. Esposito S, Principi N. Unsolved problems in the approach to
pediatric community-acquired pneumonia. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012
Jun;25(3):286-91. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328352b60c. [PubMed]
7. WORLD Health Organization. Pneumonia: The forgotten killer of
children. The United Nations Children’s Fund /World Health
Organization; Sept 2006.
8. Bharti B, Bharti S, Verma V. Role of Acute Illness Observation Scale
(AIOS) in managing severe childhood pneumonia. Indian J Pediatr. 2007
Jan;74(1):27-32.
9. Gershel JC, Goldman HS, Stein RE, Shelov SP, Ziprkowski M. The
usefulness of chest radiographs in first asthma attacks. N Engl J Med.
1983 Aug 11;309(6):336-9. [PubMed]
10. Raquel Simbalista,MarceloArau´ jo,Cristiana M.
Nascimento-Carvalho. Outcome of children hospitalized with
community-acquired pneumonia treated with aqueous penicillin G. CLINICS
2011; 66(1):95-100. [PubMed]
11. Jadavji T, Law B, Lebel MH, Kennedy WA, Gold R, Wang EE. A
practical guide for the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric pneumonia.
CMAJ. 1997 Mar 1;156(5):S703-11. [PubMed]
12. British Thoracic Society of Standards of Care Committee.
BTS guideline for the management of community acquired pneumonia in
children.Thorax. 2002; 57:i1-24.
13. Juvén T, Mertsola J, Waris M, Leinonen M, Ruuskanen O.
Clinical response to antibiotic therapy for community-acquired
pneumonia. Eur J Pediatr. 2004 Mar;163(3):140-4. Epub 2004 Jan 31. [PubMed]
14. Hedlund J, Ortqvist A, Ahlqvist T, Augustinsson A, Beckman H,
Blanck C, Burman LA, Claesson B, Qvarfordt I, Elbel E, Erntell M,
Follin P, Goscinski G, Holmberg H, Höfer M, Jorup C, Lidman C,
Lindhusen E, Rensfeldt G, Rosenkvist E, Stenlund G, Stålberg
A, Verngren K, Vig I, Wendahl S; Swedish Infectious Diseases Society
Pneumonia Study Group. Management of patients with community-acquired
pneumonia treated in hospital in Sweden. Scand J Infect Dis.
2002;34(12):887-92. [PubMed]
15. Moroney JF, Fiore AE, Harrison LH, Patterson JE, Farley MM,
Jorgensen JH et al. Clinical outcomes of bacteremic pneumococcal
pneumonia in the era of antibiotic resistance. Clin Infect Dis
2001;33:797–805. [PubMed]
16. Ruuskanen O, Mertsola J. Childhood community-acquired pneumonia.
Semin Respir Infect. 1999 Jun;14(2):163-72. [PubMed]
17. Nelson JD. Community-acquired pneumonia in children: guidelines for
treatment. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000 Mar;19(3):251-3. [PubMed]
18. Pihlajamäki M, Kotilainen P, Kaurila T, Klaukka T, Palva
E, Huovinen P; Finnish Study Group for Antimicrobial Resistance
(FiRe-Network). Macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and use of
antimicrobial agents. Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Aug 15;33(4):483-8. Epub
2001 Jul 20. [PubMed]
How to cite this article?
K Udaya, Murteli V.K.B. Outcome of children with community acquired
pneumonia treated with injection crystalline penicillin a prospective study. Int J Pediatr
Res.2016;3(9):657-660.doi:10.17511/ijpr.2016.9.05.