Over weight,
obesity and metabolic syndrome in a semi urban adolescent population in Uyo,
Nigeria
Okpokowuruk F.S.1, Akpan M.U.2,
Ikpeme E.E.3
1Dr.
Okpokowuruk Frances Sam, 2Akpan Mkpouto Udeme, 3Ikpeme
Enobong Emmanuel, Department of Paediatrics, University of Uyo Teaching
Hospital, Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria.
Corresponding Author: Okpokowuruk, Frances Sam, Department of
Paediatrics, University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo, Akwa Ibom State,
Nigeria. Email address: zipsadoo@yahoo.com
Abstract
Background: Overweight and Obesity are becoming
increasingly common in developing countries with the attendant health risks
associated with these conditions including Metabolic syndrome. The aim of this
study was to find out the prevalence of overweight, obesity and metabolic
syndrome in a population of adolescents living in a semi urban area and the
relationship between the weights of these children and the various components
of the metabolic syndrome. Materials and
Methods: One hundred and fifty-five adolescents aged 10-17 years were
selected via a multistage random sampling technique. Sociodemographic data were
obtained using a structured questionnaire and anthropometric indices were
measured using standard tools. Overweight and obesity were defined based on the
International Obesity Task Force criteria while
metabolic syndrome was defined using the International Diabetes
Foundation criteria. Blood samples were taken for Fasting blood sugar, serum
Triglycerides and High-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Results: The prevalence of overweight, obesity and metabolic
syndrome were 1.94%, 0%, and 1.94% respectively. Weight showed a significant
positive correlation with the study participants’ waist circumference, systolic
and diastolic blood pressures but not with serum triglyceride, high density
lipoprotein cholesterol and fasting blood glucose levels. Abdominal obesity and
hyperglycaemia werealso significantly associated with Metabolic syndrome.Conclusion:The prevalence of
overweight, obesity and metabolic syndrome was very low in the population
studied however, weight demonstrated a significant positive correlation with
some components of the metabolic syndrome.
Key words: Adolescents, Metabolic syndrome, Overweight,
Obesity
Author Corrected: 26th August 2018 Accepted for Publication: 31st August 2018
Introduction
The
terms overweight, obesity and metabolic syndrome are conditions that are
becoming increasingly common in various parts of the developed world especially
in the adult population [1]. In developing countries also, overweight
and obesity have become more prevalent even in children with the attendant
health risks associated with them [1-2]. Obesity in itself may or may not
necessarily lead to Metabolic Syndrome (Met S) but can be considered as a
marker for Met S [3]. Metabolic syndromeconsists of a group of
risk factors which have been found to predispose individuals to the development
of cardiovascular disease, type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM), hypertension,
dyslipidaemia, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NALFD), polycystic ovarian
syndrome(PCOS) and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA)[4].
There
are varying definitions of MetS in both children and adults [5-9]. Defining MetS in children is more
difficult because of the variability in their metabolic status throughout
childhood [10]. Also, as they transition from adolescence
to adulthood, large proportions of children
previously defined as having MetS during childhood, do not meet the diagnostic
criteria on follow-up 3 to 6 years later [11]. Despite this variability, Morrison et alfound that MetS in childhood
predicted both MetS and type 2 Diabetes mellitus in adulthood 25-30 years later
[12].
There
is a paucity of studies on MetS in our environment especially in children and
because this syndrome represents a clustering of cardiometabolic risk factors
that can predispose these children to the development of cardiovascular disease
and type 2 DM in latter life, it has become pertinent to screen for its
occurrence and predisposing risk factors in our environment and hence the
purpose of this study.
Materials and Methods
Ethical considerations: Ethical approval for the study was obtained
from the University of Uyo Teaching Hospital ethics and research committee
while informed consent was obtained from the study participants/parents.
Study setting and population: This study was conducted in Mbiabong Etoi, one
of the twenty-two villages in the Etoi clan of Uyo local government area of
Akwa Ibom state in south Nigeria. It is a semi urban metropolis located to the
north of the state capital, Uyo. A simple random sampling method was used to
select Mbiabong community out of the twenty villagesand it has only one
secondary school from which the study subjects were recruited.
One
hundred and fifty-five children aged between 10-17 years were recruited into
the study, twenty-sixstudents each were randomly selected by a simple balloting
system from each class arm i.e. classes 1- 5, twenty-five from class 6. The
minimumsample size was calculated using the formula for calculating sample size
for a cross sectional study[13] using a prevalence rate forMetabolic
syndrome of 0.9%[14].
Data collection: Demographic data was obtained using a
structured questionnaire. Anthropometric parameters including weight, height,
and waist circumference (WC) were measured using standard tools. Height and
weight were measured with subjects wearing light clothing and without shoes.
Height was measured with a stadiometer and recorded to the nearest 0.1 cm.
Weight was also measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using a calibrated scale after
adjusting appropriately before each measurement. The waist circumference was
measured to the nearest 0.1 cm at the midpoint between the bottom of the rib
cage and the top of the iliac crest at the end of exhalation. The participants’
blood pressure was measured twice after a 15-minute rest using the right arm,
and the mean was recorded as their blood pressure. Hypertension was defined as elevated
systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥130mmhg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥85mmhg.
Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height squared
(m2). Overweight and obesity were defined based on the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) definition
which defines obesity as body mass index(BMI) ≥30 and overweight as BMI ≥25[15].
Specimen collection/Laboratory analyses: Venous blood was collected from the study
participants following a 10-12 hour overnight fast. Using a multi sample
needle, blood was collected from the cubital fossa after antiseptic preparation
of the venipuncture site. The blood for fasting plasma glucose was tested using
a Fine Test glucometer while that for serum triglycerides (TG) and high-density
lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) was collected into plain vacutainers and
allowed to clot. Specimens were centrifuged using the bucket centrifuge at 4000
rpm for ten minutes and the supernatant collected. Low density lipoprotein (LDL)
and very low-densitylipoprotein (VLDL) fractions were precipitated
quantitatively by the addition of phosphotungistic acid. After centrifugation,
the cholesterol concentration in the HDL fraction was determined by the
enzymatic end point method. Serum TG assay was done using enzymatic methods (Colorimetric).
All three assays were performed using the Spectrum lab Chemistry Analyzer, New
Life Medical Instrument, England and quality control sera from Randox
Laboratories, UK.
Definition of MetS: This was defined as the presence of abdominal
obesity and at least two out of the four components of hyperglycaemia, elevated
blood pressure, hyper triglyceridaemia and low High-Density Lipoprotein-c as
defined by the International Diabetes Foundation (IDF) criteria for MetS [Table
1][5].
Table-1: The International Diabetes Federation Consensus
Definition for Metabolic Syndrome. Adapted from Zimmet et al
Criteria |
Age(10-16years) |
Age(>16years) |
Abdominal Obesity |
WC ≥ 90th percentile or adult cut-off if lower |
WC ≥ 94cm in males. WC ≥ 80cm in females |
Hypertension |
SBP ≥ 130mmHg or DBP ≥ 85mmHg |
SBP ≥ 130mmHg or DBP ≥ 85mmHg |
Hyperglycaemia |
FPG ≥ 5.6mmo/L(100mg/dl) |
FPG ≥ 5.6mmo/L(100mg/dl) |
Dyslipidaemia |
TG ≥ 1.7mmol/L (150mg/dl) and/or HDL-c <
1.03mmol/l(<40mg/dl) |
TG ≥ 1.7mmol/L(150mg/dl) and/or HDL-c
<1.03mmol/l(40mg/dl) in males, <1.29mmol/l(50mg/dl) in females |
Data Analysis- Data was analyzed usingSTATA Corp version 15
and all analysis was performed at 5% level of significance. All data were
re-coded during data cleaning with no link to individuals.Frequency tables were
constructed for the data with quantitative variables expressed as Mean ± SD,
and qualitative variables as frequencies (percent). Pearson’s moment
correlationwas used to determine the levels of correlation between the
components of MetS and weight and the level of statistical significance was put
at 5%.The study participants were classified as either underweight, normal
weight, overweight or obese based on the
International Obesity Task Force(IOTF) definition [15].The
composite variable called metabolic syndrome was computed using the IDF
criteria[5].
Results
There
was a total of one hundred and fifty-five adolescents whowere recruited into
the study of which 110 (70.97%) were females and 45 (29.03%) were males giving
a F:M ratio of 2.4:1. The ages of the subjects ranged from 10-17 years with
mean and standard deviation of 13.99±2.21 and their weight (Kg) ranging from 19
to 72 with mean and standard deviation of 42.03±10.45. Other characteristics of
the subjects are as presented in Table 2.The BMI classification of these study
participants showed that 1.94% are overweight and 58.06% are underweight (Table
3). Also 1.94% of these adolescents had metabolic syndrome. The distribution pattern of the components of
metabolic syndrome is presented in Table 4. Only abdominal obesity and
hyperglycaemia were found to be significantly associated with the presence of
MetS in this study (χ2 = 40.048, p-value =< 0.0001, χ2
= 5.057, p-value = 0.025 respectively). The study participants weights showed a
significant positive correlation with their waist circumference, systolic and
diastolic blood pressures as displayed in Table 5.Also, WC was found to be positively correlated with
SBP and DBP.
Table-2: Characteristics of Study Participants.
Characteristics |
Frequency (%) |
Mean ± SD |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Age |
|
13.99±2.21 |
10 |
17 |
Gender |
|
|
|
|
Male |
45 (29.03) |
|
|
|
Female |
110 (70.97) |
|
|
|
Weight |
|
42.03±10.45 |
19 |
72 |
Height |
|
151.23±11.45 |
115 |
182 |
Waist Circumference |
|
65.09±6.30 |
50 |
96 |
Systolic Blood Pressure |
|
108.06±14.24 |
76.6 |
163 |
Diastolic Blood Pressure |
|
67.52±10.37 |
33 |
100 |
Triglycerides |
|
1.37±0.48 |
0.6 |
2.8 |
High Density Lipoprotein |
|
1.03±0.39 |
0.3 |
2.6 |
Fasting Blood Sugar |
|
5.36±0.56 |
3.5 |
6.8 |
Table-3: Body Mass Index (BMI) Categories.
BMI Category |
Frequency (%) |
Underweight |
90 (58.06) |
Normal Weight |
62 (40.00) |
Overweight |
3 (1.94) |
Table-4: Pattern of Distribution of Components of
Metabolic Syndrome.
|
Metabolic Syndrome |
χ2 (P-value) |
|
|
No (%) |
Yes (%) |
|
Abdominal Obesity |
|
|
40.048 (<0.0001) |
No |
144 (94.74) |
0 (0.00s) |
|
Yes |
8 (5.26) |
3 (100.00) |
|
Hypertension |
|
|
0.102 (0.749) |
No |
147 (96.71) |
3 (100.00) |
|
Yes |
5 (3.29) |
0 (0.00) |
|
Hyperglycaemia |
|
|
5.057 (0.025) |
No |
79 (63.71) |
0 (0.00) |
|
Yes |
45 (36.29) |
3 (100.00) |
|
Triglyceridaemia |
|
|
0.060 (0.806) |
No |
149 (98.03) |
3 (100.00) |
|
Yes |
3 (1.97) |
0 (0.00) |
|
HDL |
|
|
2.269 (0.132) |
No |
66 (43.42) |
0 (0.00) |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
86 (56.58) |
3 (100.00) |
|
Table-5: Correlation of components of metabolic syndrome
to Weight
|
Weight |
WC |
SBP |
DBP |
TG |
HDL |
FBS |
Weight |
1.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
WC |
0.7576* |
1.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
SBP |
0.5869* |
0.4409* |
1.000 |
|
|
|
|
DBP |
0.5230* |
0.4022* |
0.7741* |
1.000 |
|
|
|
Triglycerides (TG) |
-0.1380 |
-0.0509 |
-0.0558 |
-0.0306 |
1.000 |
|
|
HDL |
0.1122 |
0.0573 |
0.0664 |
0.0990 |
-0.0751 |
1.000 |
|
FBS |
0.0924 |
0.1719 |
0.1493 |
0.1394 |
0.0938 |
-0.0582 |
1.000 |
WC – Waist Circumference; SBP – Systolic
Blood Pressure; DBP – Diastolic Blood Pressure; TG – Triglycerides; HDL – High
Density Lipoprotein; FBS – Fasting Blood Sugar
*Significant
correlation at 5% level of significance
Discussion
Overweight
and obesity are one of the major predisposing factors for the development of
Metabolic syndrome[10,16]. With the increasing prevalence of these
two factors in developing countries, it is expected that the prevalence of MetS
will also rise. None of the participants in this study was found to be obese
based on the IOTF definition for obesity using the BMI cut off ≥30. Prevalence
rates for overweight and obesity in adolescents have been found to vary in
different parts of Nigeria. In south western Nigeria, Ojofeitimi et al in a
rural area in Osun state of Nigeria, obtained prevalence rates of obesity
ranging between 0-0.2% in adolescent females attending public and private schools
respectively which is similar to the findings in this study that was also
conducted in a public school [17]. This
is contrary to the findings by Oduwole et al in Lagos, a cosmopolitan city who
obtained a rate of 9.4%[18]. In the south south, Ansa et al obtained rates of
between 3-4% in adolescents aged between 13-18 years[19]. In Uyo, Opara et al obtained a prevalence rate of
0.2% in children aged between 2-14years in public schools which is similar to
what was obtained in this study[20]. These variation in prevalence rates in obesity
obtained in the different studies may be explained by the various cut off
points used for defining obesity and overweight in these studies and
environmental influences such as diet and lifestyle.
Very few studies have been done on the prevalence of MetS
in children and adolescents in our environment.Most of the published studies in
Nigeria have been done on MetS in adults with varying frequencies based on
different criteria for defining MetS [21-23].The frequency of MetS obtained in this
study was very low when compared to that obtained by Onyenekwu et al in his
study which was carried out on adolescents and young adults aged between 13-23
years. He had a prevalence rate of 14.3% with 84.6% of those with MetS being
adolescents [16]. This study was carried out in already
overweight and obese adolescents and young adults when compared with the index
study and demonstrates the fact that MetS is commoner in obese and overweight
adolescents when compared with those who are of normal weight or underweight.
This finding is also buttressed by Ahmadi et al in a study on adolescents in
Iran and Chen in China where compared with normal weight children, overweight
and obese children were more likely to have MetS[24-25].
Studies
done in Africa on MetS have been done mainly in adults however, Aboul Ella in
Egypt in North Africa obtained a prevalence rate of 7.4% in 4250 adolescents
aged 10-18years[26]. This prevalence rate is also much higher
than what was obtained in this study. The small sample size of the index study
when compared to the large sample size in the Egyptian study is the likely
explanation for this significant difference and buttresses the fact that a much
larger study is needed in our environment.
In
assessing the correlation between various components of the MetS and the
weights of study participants, it was found that their weights demonstrated a
significant positive correlation with their systolic and diastolic blood
pressures and their waist circumference but not with their triglyceride, high
density lipoprotein and fasting blood sugar levels.Weight, which is a measure
of general adiposity being one of the components of BMI plays a significant
role in the development of MetS. Onyenekwu et al found significant differences in
the BMI, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose
and HDL levels between those who had MetS and those who did not have with those
who had MetS having higher values of BMI, WC, SBP and FPG[16].This also buttresses the finding in this
study where hyperglycaemia was significantly more common in those with MetS
when compared to those without. They had a low prevalence of
hypertriglyceridaemia which corroborates the finding in the index study that
weight was not significantly correlated with triglyceride levels. This is
contrary to findings by Ahmadi et al who observed significant, consistently higher
values of TG in both younger and older adolescents who were overweight and
obese than in those of normal weight. This observed difference may be as a
result of diet and lifestyle factors [24].
Systolic
and diastolic blood pressure also showed a significant positive correlation
with the weights of the study participants and is in keeping with findings by
various other authors[27-29]. Fasting blood sugar did not demonstrate
any significant correlation with weight in this study. This is similar to the
observation in the Iranian study by Ahmadi et al[24] that there was no significant difference in
fasting blood sugar levels between those who were of normal weight, overweight
or obese in junior high school students. However, this observed trend did not
hold true for those in the high school who were presumably older adolescents
for which they proffered changes in the hormonal milieu as a possible explanation.
Onyenekwu et al[16] also did not findany significant difference
in FBS between those who were of normal weight and those who were overweight or
obese and corroborates the finding in this study.
Waist
circumference(WC), which is a measure of central adiposity and is the major
criterion in the definition of MetS using the IDF criteria[5] was significantly
associated with the presence of MetS in this study and also had a significant
positive correlation with the weight of the study participants and this
corroborates findings by other authors[16,24]. Chen et al also observed that WC was a
more sensitive predictor of MetS and its components in children when compared
to BMI as was the case in this study[30].This central adiposity is a consequence of
the pathophysiological processes found in MetS in which insulin resistance is
the root cause [10].
The
major limitation of this study was its relatively small sample size when
compared to the large studies done in other settings and is an area for future
research while its area of strength is the additional information it gives
about Metabolic syndrome in an age group that has been least studied in our environment.
Conclusion
In
conclusion, the prevalence of overweight adolescents in this study was very low
with none of them being found to be obese, rather over fifty percent of them
were underweight. The prevalence of MetS in this study population was also very
low and in the small percentage that had MetS, waist circumference, systolic
and diastolic blood pressure were found to have a
significant correlation with the weights of the individuals concerned. The
findings in this study suggest that overweight, obesity and MetS are not yet
health problems in adolescents in our environment as findings in other areas of
the country and developing world indicate. However, with the gradual
urbanization taking place in our environment, it is pertinent to note that it
may be just a matter of time before these problems become prevalent and thus,
there is still a need for health education for the populace.
References
1. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B,
Graetz N, Margono C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of
overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic
analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet. 2014
Aug;384(9945):766–81.[pubmed]
2. Freedman DS, Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. The Relation of
Overweight to Cardiovascular Risk Factors Among Children and Adolescents: The
Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics. 1999 Jun 1;103(6):1175–82.[pubmed]
3. Weiss R, Bremer AA, Lustig RH. What is metabolic syndrome, and why
are children getting it? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013 Apr;1281:123–40.[pubmed]
4. Cornier M-A, Dabelea D, Hernandez TL, Lindstrom RC, Steig AJ, Stob
NR, et al. The metabolic syndrome. Endocr Rev. 2008 Dec;29(7):777–822.[pubmed]
5. Alberti KGMM, Zimmet P, Shaw J, IDF Epidemiology Task Force Consensus
Group. The metabolic syndrome--a new worldwide definition. Lancet Lond Engl.
2005 Sep 24;366(9491):1059–62.[pubmed]
6. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of
diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification
of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med J Br
Diabet Assoc. 1998 Jul;15(7):539–53.[pubmed]
7. Ford ES, Giles WH. A comparison of the prevalence of the metabolic
syndrome using two proposed definitions. Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):575–81.[pubmed]
8. Einhorn D, Reaven GM, Cobin RH, Ford E, Ganda OP, Handelsman Y, et
al. American College of Endocrinology position statement on the insulin resistance
syndrome. Endocr Pract Off J Am Coll Endocrinol Am Assoc Clin Endocrinol. 2003
Jun;9(3):237–52.[pubmed]
9. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood
Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National
Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And
Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III).
JAMA. 2001 May 16;285(19):2486–97.[pubmed]
10. Magge SN, Goodman E, Armstrong SC, COMMITTEE ON NUTRITION, SECTION
ON ENDOCRINOLOGY, SECTION ON OBESITY. The Metabolic Syndrome in Children and
Adolescents: Shifting the Focus to Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Clustering.
Pediatrics. 2017 Aug;140(2):e20171603.
11. Goodman E, Daniels SR, Meigs JB, Dolan LM. Instability in the
diagnosis of metabolic syndrome in adolescents. Circulation. 2007 May
1;115(17):2316–22.[pubmed]
12. Morrison JA, Friedman LA, Wang P, Glueck CJ. Metabolic syndrome in
childhood predicts adult metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus 25 to
30 years later. J Pediatr. 2008 Feb;152(2):201–6.[pubmed]
13. Daniel WW. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health
sciences. 6th ed. New York: Wiley; 1995. 780 p. (Wiley series in probability
and mathematical statistics).
14. Agudelo GM, Bedoya G, Estrada A, Patiño FA, Muñoz AM, Velásquez CM.
Variations in the Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Adolescents According to
Different Criteria Used for Diagnosis: Which Definition Should Be Chosen for
This Age Group? Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2014 May;12(4):202–9.[pubmed]
15. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard
definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey.
BMJ. 2000 May 6;320(7244):1240–3.[pubmed]
16. Onyenekwu C, Dada A, Babatunde O. The prevalence of metabolic
syndrome and its components among overweight and obese Nigerian adolescents and
young adults. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017;20(6):670.
17. Olubanji Ojofeitimi E, Iyanuoluwa Olugbenga-Bello A, Adebode
Adekanle D, Adeomi AA. Pattern and determinants of obesity among adolescent
females in private and public schools in olorunda local government area of osun
state, Nigeria: a comparative study. J Public Health Afr [Internet]. 2011 Mar 1
[cited 2018 Aug 23];2(1). Available from:
http://www.publichealthinafrica.org/index.php/jphia/article/view/37
18. Oduwole AA, Ladapo TA, Fajolu IB, Ekure EN, Adeniyi OF. Obesity and
elevated blood pressure among adolescents in Lagos, Nigeria: a cross-sectional
study. BMC Public Health. 2012 Aug 7;12:616.[pubmed]
19. Ansa VO, Odigwe CO, Anah MU. Profile of body mass index and obesity
in Nigerian children and adolescents. Niger J Med J Natl Assoc Resid Dr Niger.
2001 Jun;10(2):78–80.[pubmed]
20. Opara DC, Ikpeme EE, Ekanem US. Prevalence of Stunting, Underweight
and Obesity in School Aged Children in Uyo, Nigeria. Pak J Nutr. 2010 May
1;9(5):459–66.
21. Akintunde AA, Ayodele OE, Akinwusi PO, Opadijo GO. Metabolic
Syndrome: Comparison of Occurrence Using Three Definitions in Hypertensive
Patients. Clin Med Res. 2011 Mar 1;9(1):26–31.[pubmed]
22. Ulasi II, Ijoma CK, Onodugo OD. A community-based study of
hypertension and cardio-metabolic syndrome in semi-urban and rural communities
in Nigeria. BMC Health Serv Res [Internet]. 2010 Dec [cited 2018 Aug 23];10(1).
Available from:
http://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6963-10-71[pubmed]
23. Unadike B, Akpan N, Peters E, Essien I, Essien O. Prevalence of the
metabolic syndrome among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Uyo,
Nigeria. Afr J Endocrinol Metab [Internet]. 2010 Aug 6 [cited 2018 Aug
23];8(1). Available from:
http://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajem/article/view/57575
24. Ahmadi, Alireza Gharipour, Mojgan; Nouri, Fatemeh; Kelishadi, Roya;
Sadeghi, Masoumeh; Sarrafzadegan, Nizal. Association between adolescence
obesity and metabolic syndrome: Evidence from Isfahan Healthy Heart Program.
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014;18(4):569–73.
25. Chen F, Wang Y, Shan X, Cheng H, Hou D, Zhao X, et al. Association
between Childhood Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome: Evidence from a Large Sample
of Chinese Children and Adolescents. Nizami Q, editor. PLoS ONE. 2012 Oct
17;7(10):e47380.
26. Aboul Ella NA, Shehab DI, Ismail MA, Maksoud AA. Prevalence of
metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance among Egyptian adolescents 10 to 18
years of age. J Clin Lipidol. 2010 May;4(3):185–95.[pubmed]
27. Mehdad S, Hamrani A, Kari KE, Hamdouchi AE, Mzibri ME, Barkat A, et
al. Prevalence of elevated blood pressure and its relationship with fat mass,
body mass index and waist circumference among a group of Moroccan overweight
adolescents. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2013 Jul;7(4):e284–9.
28. Salman Z, Kirk GD, DeBoer MD. High Rate of Obesity-Associated
Hypertension among Primary Schoolchildren in Sudan. Int J Hypertens.
2011;2011:1–5.
29. Mushengezi B, Chillo P. Association between body fat composition and
blood pressure level among secondary school adolescents in Dar es Salaam,
Tanzania. Pan Afr Med J [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2018 Aug 23];19. Available
from: http://www.panafrican-med-journal.com/content/article/19/327/full/
30. LUO Jing-si,CHEN Shao-ke,FAN Xin,TANG Qing,FENG Ying. Comparison of
the value of waist circumference with that of body mass index in diagnosing
metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents. Chin J Pract Pediatr. 2012;(9).