A study of facility and community phase management of children with Severe Acute Malnutrition at NRC in Central Gujarat
Pandya
N.1, Mehta K.G.2
1Dr.
Nimisha Pandya, Department of Pediatrics, GMERS Medical College Gotri,
Vadodara, India, 2Dr. Kedar G. Mehta, Department of Preventive and
Social Medicine, GMERS Medical College, Gotri, Vadodara, India.
Corresponding
Author: Dr. Nimisha Pandya, Department of Pediatrics, GMERS Medical College
Gotri, Vadodara, India. E-mail: nimisha.pandya@hotmail.com
Abstract
Background:The
burden of Severe Acute Malnutrition, Severe underweight, and stunting is-29.4%,
15.1% and 15%. The India
National Family Health Survey (NFHS 3, 2006) states that 20% of children under
five in India are wasted,contributing to half of the global burden of
malnutrition. SAMis responsible directly or
indirectly for 35% of deaths among children under five years. Objective: The objective of this study
was to assess the demographic and clinical profiles of patients with SAM, assess
effectiveness of NRC with relation to short term outcome and to assess
compliance with the program and weight gainat the end of 2 months. Methods: A
retrospective study was conductedin children with SAM aged less than 5 years in
the NRC at GMERS Medical College Vadodara. The study assessed all children for
recovery and mortality at end of inpatient stay and at end of program at 60
days. The short-term outcomes were compared to the SPHERE standards 2011. Period
of study was from January 2017 to December 2017. Variables assessed weregender,
age at presentation, socio- economic criteria, co-morbidities, anthropometric
criteria, mean weight gain and compliance with follow up. Inclusion criteria
used were anthropometric and clinical criteria used for classification of SAM.Results: 143
patients between age of 2 months to five years were admitted with SAM. The
gender distribution for male to female patients was1.1:1. Majority of children
were aged less than 2 years (78.3).89.5% childrenwere coming from families
below poverty line and 38.5% were fully immunized for age.72.7% patients
satisfied both anthropometric criteria. Commonest co- morbidity associated with
SAM was diarrhea 22.4%, followed by lower respiratory tract infections
20.3%.Severe anemia was observed in 9.1% of patients. Outcomes were successful
discharge in 93.7%, mortality in 2.1%, and default in 4.2%. 76.2% children
showed weight gain at least 15% from baseline weight.Complete follow up (3
visits) was achieved in 57.3% patients. Conclusion:
Majority of patients presenting with SAM were belongingto below poverty line
families which suggests that improving the socio economic conditions will have
a positive impact on reduction on the incidence of severe malnutrition. Complete
follow up visits were achieved in only half of the patients. Education of
parents regarding the implications of malnutrition on long term quality of life
and positive reinforcement for follow up can ensure that successfully
discharged children do not default.
Keywords: Severe acute malnutrition, NRC, Outcomes
Author Corrected: 20th September 2018 Accepted for Publication: 24th September 2018
Introduction
Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) is
defined as a weight-for-height measurement of <-3SD, presence of bilateral
pitting edema of nutritional origin, ormid-upper-arm circumference of less than
115 mm in children age 1-5 years [1]. It is alife threatening condition requiring urgenttreatment.SAM
is responsible directly or indirectly for one-third of deaths among children
under five years.The global burden of Severe Acute Malnutrition, Severe
underweight, and stunting is- 29.4%, 15.1% and 15.1%[2]. Malnutrition in
children is highly prevalent in India. Emphasis is laid on management of
children with SAM due to 9 times higher risk of mortality in these children
with mortality being higher in children co
infected with HIV.Decreasing
child mortality and improving maternal health depends heavily on reducing
malnutrition. Initially, focus wasto
refer these children to the NRC to receive therapeutic diets along with medical
care. The introduction of ready to use therapeutic foods (RUTF) allows
management of SAM without complications and passing the appetite test, in the
community[3]. The India
National Family Health Survey (NFHS 3, 2006) states that 20% of children under
five in India are wasted,contributing to half of the global burden of
malnutrition. The objective of this retrospective
study was to assess the demographic and clinical profiles of patients with
SAM,assess effectiveness of NRC with relation to short term outcome and to
assess compliance with the program and weight gainat the end of 2 months.
In India, the inpatient model for treatment of severe
acute malnutrition (SAM) as well as community-based management of acute
malnutrition (CMAM) was adopted under Mission Balam Sukham in year 2012[4].NRCs and CMTCs are inpatient
facilities to treat SAM childrenin tertiary care hospitals and community
respectively. Children fulfilling criteria for SAM
according to WHO criteria are admitted in NRC with counseling of mothers for
proper feeding, medical management, and discharged after completion of required
NRC stay and requisite weight gain. Management is done based on WHO and IAP
guidelines for malnutrition. 3 follow up visits are done post discharge. The SPHERE
project sets minimum standards in management of children with severe acute
malnutrition, i.e. proportion of those who have recovered should be >75%,
death should be <10% and defaulted is <15%[5]. Recent study that is a compilation
of information from five different studies on the efficacy of inpatient
management of acute malnutrition in India reveals that the recovery rates of
SAM children attending the inpatient facilities are still low and the defaulter
rate is high when compared to the acceptable minimum standard.The recovery rate
varies widely in India from state to state and can be as low as 37%. In all the
studies, the recovery rate was well below the 75% standard set by SPHEREforintervention in children with SAM.All
patients with SAM admitted in NRC are treated with therapeutic food,F- 75and F-100 followed by energy dense foods
and adequate wt gain is expected. The outcomes for facility based management
are good but the child falters in the community based phase as it returns to
the same environment where optimal care is compromised. Therefore the program
provides for support till 60 days in form of 3 reimbursed follow up visits,
micronutrients and RUTF(in some states),butlittle is known about the long-term
sustainability of the nutritional and health benefits of treatment after
rehabilitation.
Objectives
1. To assess the
demographic and clinical profile of patients with SAM.
2. To assess the short term
outcomes in form of successful discharge, mortality effective weight gain and
to assess compliance with the program and weight gainat the end of 2 months.
Materials
and Methods
StudyDesign-Retrospective cohort study, hospital based.
Study
Center- NRC at GMERS Medical College
and General Hospital, Gotri, Vadodara, Gujarat.
Study Period- January 2017 to
December 2017 (one year).
Study
Population-Children aged under 5 years with
SAM
Inclusion
Criteria- The criteria for admission for inpatient treatment in NRC
were as per WHO reference [3].
Infants
less than 6 months: Infant is too weak or feeble to suckle
effectively (independently of his/her weight-for-length) or WFL
(weight-for-length) < -3SD (in infants >45 cm) or Visible severe wasting
in infants. Children 6-59 months classified
as SAM on basis of anthropometric and clinical criteria
1. WFH < -3SD
with or without any grade of edema. or
2. MUAC less than
11.5cm or
3. Bilateral pitting
edema
with Failure of
Appetite Test
with associated
complications:
1. Hypothermia.
2. Persistent
vomiting
3. Lethargic,
unconscious, convulsions
4. Hypoglycemia
5. Severe
anemia Hb<4
6. Sepsis
7. Extensive
skin lesion
Exclusion criteria- children
with SAM who refused for enrollment in NRC
Methodology- Children in age
group of 0-5 years with SAM were enrolled after counseling parents regarding
need forprolonged admission for 14 days. Patients were actively screened in community
by Aanganwadi workers oractive screening was done during routine visit and
illness in Pediatric OPD. All patients were subjected to a thorough evaluation
regarding cause of malnutrition, age, weight, height/length, MUAC, presence or
absence of bilateral edema, appetite and medical complications.
We have 15 bedded
NRC with separate kitchen and Toy room. Consultant pediatricians along with
medical officers attend to medical complications andguide the nutritionist
regarding nutritional rehabilitation. All children were managed according to
the 10 point program with early stabilization followed by catch up growth and
preparation for discharge. Therapeutic nutrition was administered, F-75 and F-100.
Daily weight gain was monitored. Micronutrients were provided and appetite was
assessed. Monetary assistance was provided to family as wage loss, Rs 200/day.
Outcome in form of successful discharge, default and death was recorded. Weight
at the time of admission and discharge was recorded and average weight gain was
calculated. Children were considered successfully discharged from the NRC when
1) The child had no
signs of bilateral pitting edema, fever, and/or infection.
2) The child had
completed all age appropriate immunizations.
3) The child was
being fed 120-130 kcal/kg weight/day
4) Adequate weight
gaini. e 15% of weight gain at presentation in a non -edematous child
5) The primary
caregiver is confident to care for child at home [3,5].
All patients were discharged after 14 days and
called for 3 visits at 15 day intervals at 1 month,1.5 month and 2 months
respectively. Monetary compensation and micronutrients wereprovided at each
visit.
Statistical Analysis-The data
was entered into Microsoft excel spreadsheet and descriptive statistical
analyses was done by SPSS Software.
Results
Table-1: Demographic and
Anthropometric profile of patients with severe acute malnutrition admitted in
NRC (N=143)
|
Number |
Percent |
|
Sex |
Male |
76 |
53.1% |
Female |
67 |
46.9% |
|
Age |
<1
year |
66 |
46.1% |
1-2
years |
46 |
32.2% |
|
2-3
years |
10 |
06.9% |
|
3-4
years |
12 |
08.4% |
|
4-5
years |
9 |
06.3% |
|
Immunization |
Complete |
55 |
38.5% |
Partial |
88 |
61.5% |
|
Socio
economic status |
Below
poverty line |
128 |
89.5% |
Above
poverty line |
15 |
10.5% |
|
Anthropometric
criteria |
Wt/ht
<-3SD and MUAC <11.5 cm |
104 |
72.7% |
Wt/ht<-3SD |
26 |
18.2% |
|
|
MUAC<11.5
cm |
13 |
09.1% |
143
patients were evaluated. Median age of presentation was14 months.78.2% children
were under 2 years of age which is statistically significant as compared to
children between 2-5 years of age (p value <0.5). There was no statistical
difference in gender distribution in SAM (M:F) 1.1:1. 88 SAM children were
partially immunized for age (89.5%) which was found to be statistically
significant in comparison with completely immunized for age (p<0.05).
Majority of the children 128(89.5%) were from below poverty line families which
was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). Both anthropometric
criteria were fulfilled in 72.7% patients.
Table-2:
Co morbidities in SAM patients admitted in NRC (N=143)
Acute
gastroenteritis |
32 |
22.4% |
Pneumonia |
29 |
20.3% |
Severe anemia |
13 |
09.1% |
Urinary
tract infections |
12 |
08.4% |
Infantile
tremor syndrome |
5 |
03.5% |
Tuberculosis |
6 |
04.2% |
Measles |
1 |
0.6% |
Congenital
heart disease |
4 |
02.8% |
Commonest
co morbid condition observed was acute gastroenteritis (22.4 %), followed by
pneumonia (20.3%). Severe anemia and Urinary tract infections were observedin
09.1% and 08.4% children. One -third of children with SAM suffer from Pneumonia
and one-third of children suffer from urinary tract infection. Therefore Chest
X -ray and urine examination are mandatory for all children with SAM.
Table-3: Outcome of SAM patients
admitted under nutritional rehabilitation program at NRC (N=143)
Discharge |
134 |
93.7% |
Default |
06 |
04.2% |
Death |
03 |
02.1% |
Expected
Weight gain 15% of baseline |
109 |
76.2% |
3
follow up visits done |
94 |
65.7% |
No. of Follow up visits |
No. |
Percentage |
3
follow up visits |
94 |
65.7% |
2 follow
up visits |
23 |
16.1% |
1
follow up visit |
7 |
04.9% |
Nil |
10 |
06.9% |
93.7% children
were discharged with 76.2% children showing effective weight gain. The
discharge, default and death rates are in accordance with SHERE Humanitarian
standards.Complete Follow -up visits were achieved in 57.3%patients only.
Emphasis should be laid on follow-up visits.
09 children were
excluded (3 deaths and 6 default).Average weight gain was8.4.gm/kg/day.
Discussion
143 patients were
admitted in our NRC.Total NRC admissions contributed to2.1% of all pediatric
admissions. Prevalence of SAM is reported to vary in different studies in India
from 3.6% in Puducherryto national prevalence being 6.4%[6].
There was no
statistical difference in sex distribution of admitted patients in our study.Somestudies
suggest a difference in sex distribution in children with SAM with a slight
female predominance due to socio cultural factors. Other studies in Africa as
well as India do not suggest a statistical difference[6-8].
In our study SAM was
predominant in children less than 2months to1 year and 1-2years, (46.1%) and
(32.2%) respectively. 80% children with SAM in study by Mathur et all were
under 24 months[9]. 92.5 % of SAM
children were under 24 months in study in Nigeria. Thisis a reflection of poor
feeding practices observed in the lower socio economic strata like poor
exclusive breast feeding rates, improper complementary feeding practices and
recurrent diarrhea and respiratory tract infections. The median age of
presentation was 14 months. The mean age of presentation is similar to other
studies in India and Africaa[8-10]. Mean age
was reported to be 22.3 months in Sudan and 14 .8 months in Enugu,Nigeria[8].
89.5% of patients
with SAM were from families living below poverty line.Lesser association was
observed in African studies (35.4%) and in Bangladesh (64.9%)[10]. Poor economic conditions have adirect impact on nutrition in
form of reduced and poor quality of nutrients and limited access to health
care.
Incomplete immunization
was observed in 61.5% children in our study. 91% children with SAM were
partially immunized in a study in Ibadan, Nigeria versus 66% in Sudan [7]. Partial
immunization was also reported to be a risk factor for SAM in study in central
India. Immunization is an indicator of health care and has role in prevention
of malnutrition. The risk of malnutrition increases in incompletely immunized
children due to increased risk of infections and late identification of growth
faltering.
Commonest co morbid
condition observed was gastroenteritis 32 (22.4%) followed by pneumonia 29 (20.3%). Studies in developing countries as well as
different parts of India show similar results though African studies show
significant presentation of Malaria due to the endemicity. This was
corroborated in studies conducted at Nepal, central India and Rajasthan [11-13].
Discharge, default
rate and death rate were 134(93.7%), 06(04.2%), 03(02.1%) respectively.
These outcomes are
in accordance with WHO objectives in effective management of SAM[3]. This proves that effective medical and therapeutic management
can reduce the risk of mortality in children.
Average weight gain
achieved was 8.4 gm/kg/day and 78% of children gained at least 15% from
baseline weight.
Conclusion
Hence, we can conclude
that Severe Acute Malnutrition is a problem that needs to be tackled
aggressively. NRCs are well supported by the government. Strengthening of the
rural health sector for immunization, active screening for common childhood
illnesses as per IMNCI program can lead to early detection, arrest and
correction of growth deceleration in our children. Community management of SAM
and introduction of RUTF is the next step that will reduce the prevalence of
SAM in long run.
Recommendation- The outcomes of children with SAM admitted at the center were favourable as
per the SPHERE standards. Continuous evaluation and strengthening of the NRCs with adequate human resources and infrastructure along with motivation of parents
can sustain these outcomes.
The follow up rates of these children are poor. Parents need guidance and motivation by the local health workers to improve the follow up.
Therefore a robust system of liasioning between the tertiarycare centres and peripheral health sector needs to be developed.
Contribution
·
Dr Kedar Mehta :for statistical analysis and final drafting.
·
Ms Hiral Patel :for data collection.
Funding:Nil
Conflictof Interest:None initiated
Acknowledgement
References
1. Community-based
management of severe acute malnutrition [Internet]. A joint statement by World
Health Organization, the World Food Programme, the United Nations System
Standing Committee on Nutrition and the United Nations Children's Fund. Geneva:
World Health Organisation;2007
2. National Family
Health Survey (NHFS-4). Ministry of Health and Family
Welfare.2015-2016.Availablefrom:URL: http://rchips.org/NFHS/pdf/NFHS4/India.pdf
3. WHO
Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee.Guideline:
Updates on the Management of Severe Acute Malnutrition in Infants and
Children. children.vol.2013.Geneva, 2013.p.6-54.
4.
SPHERE: Sphere project: humanitarian charter and minimum standards in disaster
response .2011.
5.
Mission BalamSukham, Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of
Gujarat. Available on www.gujhealth.gov.in/mission_balam_sukham.htm
6. Shewade HD, Sunderamurthy
B, Jayakumar N, Ramadoss P. Prevalence of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) among
under-five children: A community -based cross-sectional study from Puducherry
India. Indian Journal of Maternal and Child
Health. 2013;15(1):[8] p.
7. Shaza OH, Mohammed OS.
Prevalence and outcome of severe malnutrition in children less than five -year
-old in Omdurman Pediatric Hospital, Sudan.Sudanese Journal ofPaediatrics.2016;Vol 16(1):23-30.
8. Ubesei AC,
Ibeziako NS, Ndiokwelu C, Uzoka CM, Nwafor CA. Under- five protein energy
malnutrition admitted at the university of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu: a
10 year retrospective review. Nutrition Journal 2012;11:43-50.
9.Mathur
A, Tahilramani G, Makhija S, Devgan V. Burden of Severe Acute
Malnutrition in under-five Children (2-59 Months) Admitted in a
Tertiary Care Hospital of Delhi. J Trop Pediatr. 2018 Feb
1;64(1):45-50. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmx026 .[pubmed]
10. Nahar B,
Ahmed T, Brown KH, Hossain MI. Risk Factors Associated with
Severe Underweight among Young Children reporting to a Diarrhoea Treatment
Facility in Bangladesh.Journal of Health Population and Nutrition;
11. Mishra K, Kumar
P, Basu S, Rai K, Aneja S. Risk factors for Severe Acute Malnutrition in
children below five years of age in India: A case-control study. Indian Journal
of Paediatrics. .2014 August;81(8):762-5.
12. Thapa A, Shah
GS, Mishra OP. Analysis of Co-morbidities in Children with Severe Acute
Malnutrition in Eastern Nepal. Journal of Nepal Paediatric Society 2015
May-August;35(2):9-102..
13. Saini DT, Verma DA, Berwal PK.
Pattern of Co-morbidities in Children with Severe Acute Malnutrition admitted
in MTC of a teaching hospital of Western Rajasthan, India. J Med Science and
Clinical Research. 2016 April;4(4):10070-73.
How to cite this article?
Pandya N, Mehta K.G. A study of facility and community phase management of children with Severe Acute Malnutrition at NRC in Central Gujarat. Int J Pediatr Res.2018;5(9):468-473. doi:10.17511/ijpr.2018.9.07.