Growth,
neuromotor, neurosensory and psychomotor development in babies
receiving Kangaroo Mother Care- A cohort 1 year follow up study
Satpathy A1, H Udani R2, Nanavati R3, Kabra N K4
1Dr Ashish Satpathy (Corresponding author), MD (Pediatric), DM (Neonatology)
Consultant Neonatologist, Vikas Multispeciality Hospital, Bargarh, Orissa,
Email: drashish.neonatologist@yahoo.com
Cell: +918118048777
2Dr Rekha H Udani, Ex-Prof & HOD KEM hospital Mumbai, Email: Rekha.udai@gmail.com
Cell: +919819067026
3Dr. Ruchi Nanavati, Prof & HOD, Dept of Neonatology, Seth GS & KEM hospital Mumbai
Email:drruchinanavati@gmail.com
Cell:+919820127317
4Dr Nanda Kishor Kabra, Associate Prof Seth GS & KEM hospital Mumbai
Email: nskabra@gmail.com
Cell: +919820919271
Corresponding Author: Dr.
Ashish Satpathy, MD (Pediatric), DM (Neonatology), Consultant
Neonatologist, Vikas Multispeciality Hospital, Bargarh, Orissa, India.
Email: drashish.neonatologist@yahoo.com
Abstract:
Introduction:
Low birth weight infants (LBWI) constitute a worldwide problem with
high neonatal and infant mortality and morbidity. Millions of newborn
death could be avoided if more resources were invested in proven, low
cost interventions designed to address newborn’s needs. Kangaroo
Mother Care (KMC) is one such low cost and proven method of care of low
birth weight babies but has not yet been widely used in India. In
this method the infant is placed between mother’s breasts in
direct skin-to-skin contact, gives exclusive breast feeding and are
discharged home early. It is particularly useful for care of stable LBW infants below 2000g. Objective:
This cohort follow-up study was undertaken and had proved the
beneficial effects of KMC to the LBW babies to study “Growth and
neuromotor, neurosensory and psychomotor development in KMC NICU
graduate. Methods: 24 hours KMC was offered to all
babies included in the study and their Growth, neuromotor, neurosensory
and psychomotor development was followed up up to 1 year of age. Results: KMC
reduced mortality, improved breast feeding rates; KMC for 24 hours was
possible with regular intensive counseling of mothers and other family
members, The early discharge policy for low birth weight babies was
possible and beneficial to achieve intrauterine growth accretion
through regular follow up and monitoring of babies. Conclusion:
In low resources setting in developing world like India KMC- reduces
mortality, improves breast feeding rate & help in early discharge
of low birth weight babies.
Keywords: Kangaroo Mother Care, Pre-term babies, Infant Mortality, Low birth weight infants, Growth and development.
Author Corrected: 16th October 2018 Accepted for Publication: 20th October 2018
Introduction
Low birth weight infants (LBWI) constitute a worldwide problem with high neonatal and infant mortality and morbidity [1]. Care of low birth weight infants (LBWI) represents a major challenge for the health and social systems globally. In the developed countries, low birth weight rate and the associated mortality and morbidity has been reduced considerably, because of availability of expensive, sophisticated techniques and highly qualified health care professionals [2]. In less developed countries high rate of LBW are due to preterm birth and impaired intrauterine growth and their prevalence is decreasing slowly. Quality care for LBW infants could reduce neonatal mortality in developing countries, but it is expensive and not available in most of the rural and urban centers in India. In India over two thirds of deliveries occur at home [3]. Many LBW infants born in this setting do not get optimum treatment and die at home. Community based studies have shown that these infants tend to have very high mortality in the absence of any interventions [4,5]. Millions of newborn death could be avoided if more resources were invested in proven, low cost interventions designed to address newborn’s needs. Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) is one such low cost and proven method of care of low birth weight babies but has not yet been widely used in India. Kangaroo mother care (KMC) is low cost, comprehensive method of care of LBW infants and has numerous benefits to the baby, mother, community and the nation. KMC is a unique method of caring for LBW babies. In this method the infant is placed between mother’s breasts in direct skin-to-skin contact, gives exclusive breast feeding and are discharged home early. It is particularly useful for care of stable LBW infants below 2000g. The research has proved that babies nurtured in KMC have fewer incidences of hypothermia, hypoglycemia, sepsis, and apnea and have better growth and long term neurodevelopment outcome [6].Global experience and randomized controlled trials have shown the benefits of KMC. Experience with KMC in India is relatively limited. KMC could help overcome most of the constraints of conventional methods of care (CMC). KMC does not need sophisticated equipment, and for its simplicity it can be applied almost everywhere, including peripheral maternity hospitals of very low-income countries like India. KMC could also contribute to the humanization of neonatal care and containment of cost [7]. KMC was first started in Bogotá, in 1978 by Edgar Rey Sanabria and Hector Martinez, in response to shortages of staff and equipment in their hospital [8,9]. KMC was initially introduced in stable babies. The classic KMC consisted of skin-to-skin care of LBW infants, exclusive breastfeeding and early discharge with an adequate follow-up [9]. There is considerable evidence on the beneficial effects of KMC from developing as well as from developed countries. Most of the evidence on the practice of KMC has come from hospital-based studies after the initial stabilization of sick preterm and low birth weight neonates. Despite the many advantages of KMC it is still not a widely practiced method of care of LBWI in India [10]. Over 75% neonates are born and looked after in the domiciliary setting with no access to sophisticated, expensive and prolonged medical care [11]. Clear scientific evidences are needed to establish the safety and suitability of domiciliary KMC for babies born at home and hospital [1]. This simple method is found suitable and safe and need to be culturally acceptable. This new primary modality which is already incorporated into the essential newborn care package needs to be disseminated all throughout the country [12]. More evidence is also required for assessing effectiveness of KMC for LBW and preterm infants [11]. The present descriptive follow-up study was undertaken, as the randomized control trial and had proved the beneficial effects of KMC to the LBW babies to study “Growth and development in KMC NICU graduate”. Methodology. The follow up study in babies receiving Kangaroo Mother Care was carried out from October 2005 to January 2007 in a major tertiary teaching and referral center for high risk deliveries with a tertiary level neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and Ambulatory kangaroo mother care center-“SishuGhar”.
Inclusion criteria: All Inborn babies with birth weight ≤ 1800grams.
Exclusion criteria: Babies born outside and admitted in NICU.
· Mothers unwilling to participate and come for regular follow up.
· Babies requiring transfer to other hospitals.
· Chromosomal and life threatening congenital anomalies.
· Mothers left against medical advice
· Multiple pregnancy
· All eligible babies weighing ≤ 1800 g were enrolled for Kangaroo mother care. At the time of enrollment, detailed history was recorded on a pre-designed proforma. Gestational age was determined by performing New Ballard’s scoring, within 24 hours of life.
Anthropometric assessment
· Babies were weighed naked on an electronic weighing scale (Conweigh, Zeal medical, Electronic weighing scale - accuracy of + 5 g) immediately after birth and daily till discharge. The weighing machines were calibrated daily with 5 g standard weight.
· The length was measured at birth, at discharge and at each follow-up visit by using an infantometer.
· The mothers provided skin to skin contact using “Kangaroo bag” made of soft flannel cloth. Babies were well dressed with front open shirt, cap, and preferably soak proof diaper or cotton in a polydrip sheet and socks before placing in kangaroo bag.
For the purpose of the study infants were divided in to two groups on the basis of duration of KMC –
· Inadequate KMC: KMC for ≤12 hrs
· Continuous KMC : KMC for ≥18 hrs
Individual
and group health talks were given to KMC mothers. They and their family
members were grouped together daily to educate regarding care of low
birth weight infants and for breastfeeding. During the health talk
importance of temperature maintenance, advantages of kangaroo mother
care and breast milk were emphasized.
Feeding
All
babies were exclusively breast fed two hourly along with calcium (100
mg/kg/d), phosphorus (50 mg/kg/d) and multi vitamin supplementation
with zinc once they reached fifty percent feeds. Iron was started in
prophylactic dose 2mg/kg at 2 weeks of life.
Discharge and follow up
Babies were discharged when they met the following criteria:-
· Weight gain for two or three consecutive days.
· Successfully breastfeeding or wati-spoon feeding.
· Maintaining temperature in KMC.
· No evidence of illness.
· Mothers confident of caring for her baby.
· Assurance of follow-up.
· Successful “In hospital adaptation” of mother and other kangaroo care provider.
Babies were followed up at the kangaroo ambulatory center called “ShishuGhar” situated away from NICU. Before discharge from NICU relatives were asked to visit “Shishughar” for familiarizing with the follow-up center.
After discharge babies were asked to come on the next day at “Shishu Ghar”, and then subsequently daily till there was weight gain for 3 consecutive days of 15-20g/kg/day and after that alternate day and then once weekly till a preterm baby attained a post-connectional age of 40 weeks of corrected date of birth (CDOB) and till the weight gain achieved up to 2500g for full term SGA babies. Later families were asked to bring babies every month and definitely at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. At each follow-up the following parameters were assessed.
· Anthropometry- weight, length, head circumference, chest circumference and mid-arm circumference.
· Compliance with KMC (KMC charts) i.e., duration of KMC per day.
· Evidences of any illnesses.
· Continuation of exclusive breastfeeding up to 6 months.
· Neuromotor examination by INFANIB at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months[ 25]. Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB)) is a tool to predict neurological outcome in premature babies.
· Psychomotor examination done by Griffith developmental scale at 6 and 12 months[26}.
The
Griffiths Scales of Mental Development (Griffiths Scales) are among the
most widely researched tests for the assessment of infants and young
children in the world . The Griffiths Scales (Griffiths, 1970) provide a
general development quotient in addition to measures of six domains of
functioning, each of which is assessed on a separate subscale. These
subscales are: Subscale A (Locomotor); Subscale B
(Personal–Social); Subscale C (Hearing and Speech); Subscale D
(Eye and Hand Coordination); Subscale E (Performance); and Subscale F
(Practical Reasoning).
· Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometryat discharge (BERA) or within 2 month. In case of abnormality on screening test babies were subjected to diagnostic BERA.
Statistical Analysis
All data were recorded on a pre-designed proforma, tabulated and the results were analyzed statistically by SPSS statistical software (version 11.5).
Results
This
prospective cohort follow-up study was conducted in ShishuGhar KMC
follow-up center attached with a level III neonatal intensive care unit
of a major teaching and referral hospital in the city of Mumbai
(between October 2005 and January 2007).The babies’ ≤ 1800g
born between October 2005 to March 2006 were enrolled and followed up.
Table- 1: Baseline Characteristics
|
No. |
% |
Total live births |
3865 |
|
Total babies ≤ 1800g |
289 |
7.4 |
Total babies included and enrolled for follow-up |
176 |
|
Subjects not enrolled and excluded |
113 |
|
Reasons for not enrolling |
|
|
· Died in NICU before enrollment |
30 |
10.3 |
· Went against medical advice |
13 |
4.4 |
· Babies requiring transfer to other hospitals or department |
2 |
0.6 |
· Mothers refused for enrollment as they were planning to leave Mumbai in the near future and not willing to come |
16 |
5.5 |
· Multiple birth |
52 |
17.9 |
Babies followed-up till 6 month |
145 |
90.34 |
Babies followed-up till 9 month |
106 |
|
Babies followed-up till 1 year |
57 |
|
Babies died in follow-up |
14 |
7.9 |
Lost to follow-up as address and phone number given were wrong and could not be traced |
17 |
10.9 |
There
were 3865 deliveries during the study period, 289 (7.4%) babies were
≤1800 g. One hundred and thirteen (39.1%) babies were not enrolled
and not meeting the inclusion criteria because of various reasons like,
30 (10.3%) babies died in NICU before enrollment, 13 (4.4%) babies were
discharged against medical advice, 2 (0.6%) babies required transfer to
other department or hospital, 16 (5.5%) mothers refused for enrollment
as they were planning to go to native place after delivery and did not
agree to come for continuous follow-up. There were 52 (17.9%) mothers
with multiple gestations. Fourteen babies (7.9%) died during follow-up
and 17 (10. 9%) babies lost to follow-up. One hundred
forty-five babies were followed up to 6 month. Out of them 106 babies
completed 9 month and 57 babies completed 12 month of age after CDOB.
Of these 145 subjects; 56 were from inadequate KMC group (KMC for ≤12 hrs) and 89 were in Continuous KMC group (KMC for ≥18 hrs)
Table-2: Morbidity on follow-up according to study groups
Parameters |
Inadequate KMC n=56 |
Continuous KMC n=89 |
p |
Apnea |
2 (3.5%) |
1 (1.1%) |
0.53 |
Hypothermia |
2 (3.5%) |
0 (0%) |
0.42 |
Hypoglycemia |
7 (12.5%) |
1 (1.1%) |
* |
Respiratory Infection |
15 (26.7%) |
0 (0%) |
* |
Readmission |
4 (7.4%) |
1 (1.1%) |
0.31 |
(*statistical test couldn’t be applied)
During
follow-up morbidity, readmission rate and mortality were lower with
continuous KMC group and Hypoglycemia and respiratory infection was not
noted in continuous KMC implying that continuous KMC was good.
Table-3: Mortality during follow upaccording to study groups.
KMC Group |
Inadequate KMC (n=56+12) |
ContinuousKMC(n=89+2) |
p |
Death |
12 |
2 |
|
% |
17.64% |
2.1% |
≤0.001 |
Overall
mortality rate in present follow up study was 8.8%. There were 12
(17.64%) deaths in Inadequate KMC group and 2 deaths (2.1%) in
continuous KMC group, indicating continuous KMC reduced mortality
(p≤ 0.001).Out of 14 deaths during follow up only 3 babies completed
CDOB and rest all died before reaching CDOB. All the 3 babies who
completed CDOB died before completing 3months. In all 14 babies after
enquiry cause of death was narrated as sepsis and / or pneumonia.
Continuous KMC significantly reduced the mortality (P≤0.001).
Table- 4: Comparison: KMC group with mean GA, Birth wt, Day of enrollment and hospital stay.
KMC group |
GA (wk) (mean ±SD) |
Birth weight (g) (mean ±SD) |
Day of enrollment (mean ±SD) |
NICU Stay (mean ±SD) |
Hospital stay (mean ±SD) |
Inadequate KMC n=56 |
34.13±2.78 |
1461.64±246.38 |
5.46±4.83 |
12.21±16.33 |
15.14±15.93 |
Continuous KMC n=89 |
33.68±3.28 |
1454.29±243.01 |
4.09±2.67 |
8.02±6.32 |
10.10±6.15 |
Total 145(100 %) |
33.96±2.98 |
1458.80±244.26 |
4.62±3.70 |
9.64±11.44 |
12.06±11.25 |
P |
0.51 |
0.42 |
0.31 |
0.002 |
0.001 |
The babies in both groups were comparable in terms of gestational age, weight and day of enrolment for KMC.
The
babies who received KMC for longer durations, the NICU stay (p=0.002)
and hospital stay (p=0.001) had decreased significantly as compared to
shorter duration of KMC but multivariate analysis revealed that the
babies in inadequate KMC group were sicker with stormy NICU course.
Table-
5 Growth indices up to 12 months of corrected age (% of expected
average for age), for infant receiving inadequate KMC and adequate KMC.
Age (month) |
Wt for age(%of expected average wt for corrected age |
Height for age(%of expected average Ht for corrected age |
Head circumference for age(%of expected average HC for corrected age |
||||||
|
Inadequate KMC (n=56) |
Continuous KMC (n=89) |
p |
Inadequate KMC (n=56) |
Continuous KMC (n=89) |
p |
Inadequate KMC (n=56) |
Continuous KMC (n=89) |
p |
CDOB (n=145) |
103.45 |
105.67 |
NS |
95.57 |
95.76 |
NS |
95.94 |
97.97 |
0.11 |
3month (n=145) |
86.47 |
86.99 |
NS |
99.30 |
99.48 |
NS |
96.18 |
99.82 |
0.02 |
6month (n=145) |
89.88 |
91.95 |
NS |
101.21 |
101.63 |
NS |
100.08 |
100.42 |
0.53 |
9month (n=106) |
99.18 |
99.18 |
NS |
101.57 |
100.49 |
NS |
102.50 |
102.76 |
0.64 |
12month (n=57) |
101.04 |
104.19 |
NS |
100.97 |
101.29 |
NS |
99.84 |
101.22 |
0.50 |
· All the expected anthropometric parameters up to CDOB
were calculated as per the intrauterine accretion rate of 15g/kg for
weight and 0.7cm/week for length and head circumference , subsequently for 3,6,9 and 12 month was calculated for each baby as per recommended by NRBC growth chart and then percentage of expected average weight, length and head circumference were calculated from observed value for corrected age.
· Growth
indices were comparable for weight and leng that corrected age except
for head circumference between CDOB to 3 month. The growth of head
circumference expressed as a proportion of expected head circumference
at 3 months of corrected age, was probably associated with KMC
intervention (P≤0.02).
Table-6 Increment in anthropometry up to 1 year.
Parameters |
Up to CDOB |
CDOB to 3 mo |
3-6 mo |
6-9mo |
9-12mo |
Wt (g/d) |
18.16 |
22.66 |
13.51 |
14.00 |
13.59 |
TL (cm/wk) |
0.54 |
0.77 |
0.52 |
0.38 |
0.33 |
HC (cm/wk) |
0.54 |
0.36 |
0.23 |
0.20 |
0.14 |
CC (cm/wk) |
0.41 |
0.46 |
0.25 |
0.27 |
0.20 |
MAC (cm/wk) |
0.27 |
0.20 |
0.07 |
0.06 |
0.04 |
· Increment in wt, TL, HC, CC and MAC up to CDOB reported to be 18.16g/d,0.54cm/wk,0.54/wk,0.41/wk and 0.27/wk respectively.
· Increment in wt, TL, HC, CC and MAC in first 3 month reported to be 22.66g/d,0.77cm/wk,0.36/wk,0.46/wk and 0.20/wk respectively.
· Increment in wt, TL, HC, CC and MAC 3 - 6 months reported to be 13.51g/d,0.52cm/wk,0.23/wk,0.25/wk and 0.07/wk respectively.
· Increment in wt, TL, HC, CC and MAC 6 - 9 months reported to be 14.00g/d,0.38cm/wk,0.20/wk,0.27/wk and 0.06/wk respectively.
· Increment in wt, TL, HC, CC and MAC 9 - 9 months reported to be 13.59g/d,0.33cm/wk,0.14/wk,0.20/wk and 0.04/wk respectively
Table-7 Comparison of sequel measured after completion of study.
6 months |
|
12 months |
||||||||
Variable |
Inadequate KMC n=56 |
Continuous KMC n=89 |
P |
Variable |
Inadequate KMC n=22 |
Continuous KMC n=35 |
p |
|||
Tone abnormality |
17(30.3%) |
21(23.5%) |
NS |
Cerebral palsy |
1(5.2%) |
2(6%) |
NS |
|||
Transient |
Abnormal |
17(30.3%) |
0 |
18(20.2%) |
3(3.3%) |
|||||
Abnormal Griffith 6 mo |
|
|
|
Abnormal Griffith 12 mo |
|
|
|
|||
≤50 |
0 |
0 |
NS |
≤50 |
1(4.5%) |
1(2.8%) |
NS |
|||
51-70 |
2(3.5%) |
2(2.2%) |
51-70 |
2(9%) |
1(2.8%) |
|||||
71-90 |
6(10.7%) |
5(5.6%) |
71-90 |
3(13.6%) |
2(5.7%) |
|||||
>90 |
48(85.7%) |
82(92.1%) |
>90 |
16(72.7%) |
31(88.5%) |
|||||
ROP screening at 4 weeks |
9(16%) |
6(6.7%) |
|
Blindness |
- |
- |
- |
|||
Deafness |
2(3.5%) |
2(2.2%) |
NS |
Deafness |
- |
- |
- |
|||
No
difference was found between the two groups in the proportion of
infants with cerebral palsy, psychomotor delay or visual or hearing
impairment at 6 month and 1 yr. of corrected age.
Table-8 Griffith score with Neurological outcome according to subgroups AGA/ASGA/SSGA
Month |
AGA |
ASGA |
SSGA |
Griffith DQ |
||
6mo |
12mo |
|||||
3 |
An=8 |
5(62.5%) |
1(12.5%) |
2(25%) |
|
|
Tn=36 |
18(50%) |
12(33.3%) |
6(16.6%) |
|
|
|
6 |
An=3 |
2(66.6%) |
0(0%) |
1(33.3%) |
85 |
36.15 |
Tn=35 |
22(62.8%) |
8(22.8%) |
5(14.2%) |
|
|
|
9 |
An=5 |
2(40%) |
0(0%) |
3(60%) |
|
|
Tn=19 |
12(63.1%) |
6(31.5%) |
1(5.2%) |
|
|
|
12 |
An=3 |
0(0%) |
0(0%) |
3(100%) |
91 |
31.82 |
Tn=2 |
0(0%) |
1(50%) |
1(50%) |
|
|
AGA:
appropriate for gestational age, ASGA: Asymmetrical Small for
gestational age, SSGA: Symmetrical small for gestational age. Abnormal
Infanib at 3 months was noted to be higher in AGA 62.5 % in SSGA it was
25 percent. When these babies were examined at 6 months, DQ AGA babies
were 85 and of SSGA were 36.5. At 12 month of assessment total 5 babies
were abnormality, 2 were transient and 3 were having abnormal Infanib.
All babies were SGA babies (100%).
Table-9 Griffith Quotients for psychomotor development at 6 and 12 month of CDOB.
Criteria |
Age(month) |
|||||
|
6 months |
12 months |
||||
|
Inadequate KMC n=56 |
Continuous KMC n=89 |
P |
Inadequate KMC n=22 |
Continuous KMC n=35 |
P |
All |
92.5 |
94.2 |
NS |
96.7 |
98.8 |
NS |
Locomotion |
88.8 |
89.7 |
NS |
92.2. |
94.4. |
NS |
Personal, social |
94.2 |
96.6 |
NS |
95.4 |
97.1 |
NS |
Hand eye coordination |
94.1 |
96.4 |
NS |
96.5 |
96.8 |
NS |
Audition, language |
90.5 |
91.4 |
NS |
92.6 |
93.5 |
NS |
Execution |
94.9 |
97.1 |
NS |
98.1 |
100.2 |
NS |
No
differences were found between the two groups in the different
components of Griffith’s psychomotor scale at 6 and 12 months and
were comparable.
Table- 10. OccupationalTherapy requirements.
Infanib3mo |
OccupationalTherapy |
Total n=145 |
||
NR n=101 |
IRG n=13 |
REG n=31 |
||
Normal |
101 |
0 |
0 |
|
Abnormal |
0 |
3 |
5 |
8 |
Transient |
0 |
10 |
26 |
36 |
44
babies received (30.34%) Occupational Therapy, out of them were 8
abnormal and 5 (62.5%) received regular OT and out of 36 transient, 26(72.2%) received regular OT.
· Regular OT improved neuromotor performance
Discussion:
Preterm low birth weight baby does require warmth and nutrition for 24 hours a day for its optimal growth. Though
studies in KMC are scanty, but recent studies did reveal the benefits
of KMC in terms of morbidity and mortality. The present prospective
follow up study was undertaken in a level III Neonatal Intensive Care
Unit (NICU) to study growth, development, neurosensory, neuromotor and
psychomotor development in babies receiving KMC. Despite
educating mothers for 24 hours KMC the family had not provided KMC for
24 hours .The study therefore compared babies who received continuous
KMC and with those receiving inadequate KMC.
In
the present study a total of 176 new born babies met inclusion criteria
and 145 (90.34%) babies were followed-up up to one year. The result of
KMC follow up rate varying from 84 to 95% was comparable with studies
carried out by Charpak [13,14], Rao[15] and Aloke et al [16]. The
reason for not following up in the study by Lincetto et al [17] was
lack of money to pay for transport, illness of the mother, staying far
away, baby was healthy. In the present study 17 cases (10.9%) did not
follow-up and the reasons for not following-up could not be found as
the address and phone numbers given were wrong and could not be traced .
Our
results were similar to the study done by Rao et al (89.2%)15 and
Charpak et al [13] with higher follow-up rate approximating 90 percent.
Higher follow-up in KMC babies was probably due to repeated motivation
and counseling during the stay in the hospital as well as after
discharge.
The
mean gestational age at eligibility was comparable in the studies
carried out by Sloan et al at 34.6wk [18], Charpak et al at 35.3wks
[14], and 33.6 wks [13], Cattaneo et al at 33.7wks [19], Rao et al at
35.2wks [15] and Aloke et al at 34.2 wks [16].The birth weight in later
studies was <2000g and in the present study it was ≤1800 grams.
In the present study the mean birth weight at enrollment was 1458.80g,
which was lower than Sloan et al -1704g [18], Charpak et al -1696g [14]
and 1705g [13], Rao et al -1683g [15] and Cattaneo et al -1622g [19]
In
the present study 3 (2%) babies had apnea during follow-up, with two
cases in inadequate KMC and one in continuous KMC group. Babies in
inadequate KMC groups had stormy NICU course with birth weight of 1541g
and 952g and gestational age of 32 weeks and 28 weeks respectively and
baby in continuous KMC group was 758g with 27 wks gestational age. Rao
et al [15] in their RCT had recorded a significant reduction in apnea
in KMC babies (KMC Vs CMC; 4% Vs 11%) and the reduction was
significantly higher in <1500g babies (KMC Vs CMC: 1% Vs 8%,
P=0.0069).
In
continuous KMC group no babies suffered from lower respiratory
infection. Fifteen babies (26.7%) had proven lower respiratory
infection with pneumonia during follow-up with inadequate KMC group.
Respiratory infection was found to be 3.4% and 5% with Charpak [20] and
Sloan et al [18] respectively in KMC group. The absence of respiratory
infection in the present study with continuous KMC could be due to
either parent informed the health personnel earlier during the visit so
that the babies were treated earlier and did not suffer from lower
respiratory infection or the parents did not inform the health
personnel at the time of visit.
The
Cochrane analysis [21] mentioned that KMC reduced nosocomial infection
at 41 weeks' corrected gestational age (relative risk 0.49, 95%
confidence interval 0.25 to 0.93) and severe illness (relative risk
0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.14 to 0.67).In present study babies in
continuous KMC and inadequate KMC did not suffer from severe illness or
diarrhea which was probably due to KMC intervention with exclusive
breastfeeding and close supervision on follow up by health care
personnel.
There
were 12 (17.64%) deaths in Inadequate KMC group and 2 deaths (2.1%) in
continuous KMC group, indicated that continuous KMC reduced mortality
(p= 0.001).
Various
authors Rey [22], and Bergmani [23] noted mortality ranging from 28 to
50% in KMC group which was higher than both continuous (2.1%) and
inadequate (17.6%) KMC of present study. The higher mortality in their
study was probably due to inclusion of babies with birth weight of
<1500 g and KMC for shorter duration. Mortality reported by Charpak,
Cattaneo, Lincetto [13,19,24,22] ranged from 1.6 % to 4.4% in KMC group
which was comparable with the present study of 2.1%.In the present
study the weight gain in continuous KMC group was 17.3g/day and 22.2g/d
among preterm and term group respectively (average of both 18.16 g/d).
Which was comparable with the various other studies [13,14,19].
The
higher weight gain of 23.9g/d in the study by Rao et al [15] compared
with the present study, despite having comparable average duration of
KMC per day (13.5 hr/day in both the groups) could be because of larger
basal weight of 1683 g and more mature babies of 35.29 wks in their
study group as compared with the present study. (1458g and 33.9 wks).
Growth
indices were comparable in inadequate and continuous KMC for weight and
length for corrected age except for head circumference at CDOB and at 3
month. The growth of head circumference expressed as a proportion of
expected head circumference at 3 months of corrected age, was probably
associated with continuous KMC intervention (P=0.02)
It
was noted from the present study that the neurological assessment at 3
month Infanib, out of 145 babies, 36 (24.8%) babies had transient
neurological abnormality and 8 (5.5%) babies had abnormal Infanib with
no difference in both KMC groups. It was found that all 8 abnormal
babies had stormy NICU course. There were 70% babies were SGA having
transient or abnormal and 20% AGA had transient or abnormal Infanib.
Both transient and abnormal babies (30.34%) received occupational
therapy.
In
the present follow up study psychomotor assessment was evaluated by
Griffith psychomotor scale at 6 months and 12 months. The mean Griffith
score at 6 month CDOB was 93.9 and 99.9 among inadequate KMC and in
continuous KMC group respectively (p=0.60) and at 12 month CDOB mean
Griffith score was 91.7 among inadequate and 98.8in continuous KMC
group Present study noted that babies who received continuous KMC had
higher Griffith score both at 6 and 12 month CDOB which was comparable
to that by Charpak et al(48) (Table38) but it cannot be attributed to
KMC because the sequelae identified probably seemed to have originated
from the process that occurred before eligibility and it would be
unrealistic to expect KMC could modify these outcomes.
Conclusions
While
comparing with other studies it was revealed that in the present study
the KMC reduced mortality. It could be concluded from the present study
that KMC intervention improved breast feeding rates; KMC for 24 hrs was
possible with regular intensive counseling of mothers and other family
members. The early discharge policy for low birth weight babies was
possible and beneficial to achieve intrauterine growth accretion
through regular follow up and monitoring of babies while giving domiciliary ambulatory continuous KMC preferably 24 hrs.
I am thankful to all co-authors to guide me during the study process and helping me in manuscript preparation
Contribution to existing knowledge:
In
low resources setting in developing world like India KMC- reduces
mortality, improves breast feeding rate & help in early discharge
of low birth weight babies.
Abbreviations:
LBWI: Low birth weight infants
KMC: Kangaroo Mother Care
NICU: Neonatal intensive care unit
CMC: conventional methods of care
CDOB: corrected date of birth
BERA: Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry at discharge
References
1. Kangaroo mother Care. A practical guide. Dept.of Reproductive Health and Research. Geneva, World Health organisation.1. 2003
2.
Charpak N, Ruiz-Pelaez JG, Figueroa de C Z, Charpak Y. A randomized,
controlled trial of kangaroo mother care: results of follow-up at 1
year of corrected age. Pediatrics. 2001 Nov;108(5):1072-9.[pubmed]
3. International Institute of Population Sciences. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-II), 1998-99. Mumbai: IIPS; 2000.
4.
Bang AT, Bang RA, Baitule SB, et al. Effect of home-based neonatal care
and management of sepsis on neonatal mortality: field trial in rural
India. Lancet. 1999 Dec 4;354(9194):1955-61.
DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(99)03046-9.[pubmed]
5.
Bang AT, Bang RA, Baitule S, et al. Burden of morbidities and the unmet
need for health care in rural neonates--a prospective observational
study in Gadchiroli, India. Indian Pediatr. 2001 Sep;38(9):952-65.[pubmed]
6.
Charpak N, Ruiz JG, Zupan J, et al. Kangaroo Mother Care: 25 years
after. Acta Paediatr. 2005 May;94(5):514-22.
DOI:10.1080/08035250510027381.[pubmed]
7. Charpak N, Ruiz JG, Figueroa de Calume Z. Humanizing neonatal care. Acta Paediatr. 2000 May;89(5):501-2.[pubmed]
8.
Rey ES, Martinez HG. Manejo racional del nino prematuro. In Curso de
Medicina Fetal, Universidad Nacional, Bogota. Colombia, 1983.
9.
Whitelaw A, Sleath K. Myth of the marsupial mother: home care of very
low birth weight babies in Bogota, Colombia. Lancet. 1985 May
25;1(8439):1206-8.[pubmed]
10. Meherban Singh. Temperature regulation, In care of newborn. Ed Meherban Singh. 5th Edition , New Delhi: Sagar Publications 2000; 190-197
11. Newborn health key to child survival- report of Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, 2001; 1-7.
12.
Ramanathan K, Paul VK, Deorari AK, et al. Kangaroo Mother Care in very
low birth weight infants. Indian J Pediatr. 2001 Nov;68(11):1019-23.[pubmed]
13.Charpak
N, Ruiz-Peláez JG, Figueroa de C Z, Charpak Y. Kangaroo mother
versus traditional care for newborn infants </=2000 grams: a
randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 1997 Oct;100(4):682-8.[pubmed]
14.
Charpak N, Ruiz-Peláez JG, Charpak Y. Rey-Martinez Kangaroo
Mother Program: an alternative way of caring for low birth weight
infants? One year mortality in a two cohort study. Pediatrics. 1994
Dec;94(6 Pt 1):804-10.[pubmed]
15. Rao suman PN, RekhaUdani, RuchiNanavati. Kangaroo
mother care for low birth weight infants: A randomized control trial,
Paper presented at XXV Annual Convention of the National Neonatology
Forum, 2005 (Abstract book,11).
16.
Aloke V R, Nanavati RN, Udani RH. Reduction in NICU cost
–Kangaroo mother care the only option. Poster paper presented at
XXV Annual Convention of the National Neonatology Forum, 2005 (Abstract
book,99).
17.
Lincetto O, Vos ET, Graça A, et al. Impact of season and
discharge weight on complications and growth of Kangaroo Mother Care
treated low birthweight infants in Mozambique. Acta Paediatr. 1998
Apr;87(4):433-9.[pubmed]
18.
Sloan NL, Camacho LWL, Rojas EP, et al : Kangaroo mother method:
Randomised controlled trial of an alternative method of care for
stabilised low birth weight infants. Lancet 1994 Sep 17;344(8925):782-5.
19.
Cattaneo A, Davanzo R, Worku B, et al. Kangaroo mother care for low
birthweight infants: a randomized controlled trial in different
settings. Acta Paediatr. 1998 Sep;87(9):976-85.[pubmed]
20.
Charpak N, Ruiz-Pelaez JG, Figueroa de C Z, Charpak Y. A randomized,
controlled trial of kangaroo mother care: results of follow-up at 1
year of corrected age. Pediatrics. 2001 Nov;108(5):1072-9.[pubmed]
21.
Conde-Agudelo A, Diaz-Rossello JL, Belizan JM. Kangaroo mother care to
reduce morbidity and mortality in low birthweight infants. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2000;(4):CD002771.[pubmed]
22.
Rey ES, Martinez HG. Manejo racional del nino prematuro. In Curso de
Medicina Fetal, Universidad Nacional, Bogota. Colombia, 1983.
23.
BergmanNJ, Jurisso LA. The “Kangaroo-method” for treating
low birth weight babies in a developing country. Tropical Doctor 1994 Apr;24(2):57-60
24.
Lincetto O, Vos ET, Graça A, et al. Impact of season and
discharge weight on complications and growth of Kangaroo Mother Care
treated low birthweight infants in Mozambique. Acta Paediatr. 1998
Apr;87(4):433-9.[pubmed]
25.
Ellison PH, Horn JL, Browning CA. Construction of an Infant
Neurological International Battery (Infanib) for the assessment of
neurological integrity in infancy. Phys Ther. 1985 Sep;65(9):1326-31.[pubmed]
26. Dolores M luiz et al The Griffith scale of mental development:A factorial validity study: South African Journal of Psychology, 36(1) 2006, pp. 1062–1087
How to cite this article?
Satpathy A, H Udani R, Nanavati R, Kabra N K. Growth, neuromotor, neurosensory and psychomotor development in babies receiving Kangaroo Mother Care- A cohort 1 year follow up study. Int J Pediatr Res. 2018;5(10):511-520. doi:10.17511/ijpr.2018.10.06.