Correlation between NT
pro-b-type Natriuretic peptide and left ventricular ejection fraction in
children presenting with Dyspnea – a prospective cohort study
Aswathy Rajan1,
Shriyan Ashvij2, Prem Alva3, Santosh T Soans4
1Dr.
Aswathy Rajan, Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, A. J. Institute
of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, 2Dr. Shriyan Ashvij, Assistant
Professor, Department of Pediatrics, A. J. Institute of Medical Sciences,
Mangalore, 3Dr. Prem Alva, Consultant Pediatric Cardiologist,
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, A. J. Hospital and Research Centre,
Mangalore, 4Dr. Santosh T Soans, - Professor and HOD, Department of
Pediatrics, A. J. Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Corresponding
Author: Dr. Shriyan Ashvij, Assistant Professor, Department of
Pediatrics, A. J. Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India. E-mail:
ashvijs@yahoo.co.in
Abstract
Introduction:
Simple screening tests exist for congenital heart diseases but the same cannot
be said for cardiac failure in children. Although echocardiography is
considered the gold standard for the detection of left ventricular dysfunction,
it is relatively expensive and is not often readily available. We aim to prove
that NT pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels may be useful in ruling out the
diagnosis of heart failure in children presenting to the emergency room with
dyspnea by studying the relation between left ventricular ejection fraction and
NT pro-BNP. Methods: Seventy four
patients presenting to the emergency department with dyspnea and fulfilling the
modified Ross’ criteria for heart failure were included in the study. NT
pro-BNP levels were measured for all the patients and a two-dimensional
echocardiographic study was performed for them. Statistical analyses were
performed using chi square test for independent samples and Pearson correlation
tests. Results: A significant
inverse correlation was observed between NT pro-BNP levels and left ventricular
ejection fraction (r=-0.789, p=0.003). Conclusion:
NT pro-BNP assay appears to hold promise as a potent and cost effective test of
choice for acutely dyspneic children, which could replace chest x-ray and
echocardiography as first investigation in such patients in urgent care
settings.
Keywords: NT
pro-BNP, left ventricular ejection fraction, heart failure
Manuscript received: 4th November 2018 Reviewed: 10th November 2018
Author Corrected: 15th November 2018 Accepted for Publication: 19th November 2018
Introduction
Heart
failure is estimated to affect 12,000 to 35,000 children below 19 years of age
in the United States each year. The presentation of pediatric heart failure is
diverse because of the numerous underlying cardiac etiologies and varying
clinical settings [1]. The recognition of heart disease in children can be
challenging as children often have a limited repertoire of presenting signs and
symptoms. Many cardiac disease states can mimic the more common illnesses of
childhood, such as bronchiolitis, reactive airway disease, and sepsis. The
diagnosis of heart disease can be especially difficult when children present at
institutions that do not specialize in pediatric health care and are without
ready access to pediatric echocardiography [2,3].
Pediatric
patients with cardiac disease that results in profound cyanosis or a loud
murmur usually have rapid recognition and diagnosis as a result of the
prominent physical findings. Many of these presenting signs and symptoms also
present in other common diseases of childhood, most notably in viral illnesses.
A reliable marker of heart disease in children would be of great benefit to
those who practice pediatric health care and to the children in their care [2].
N-terminal
pro-Brain-natriuretic peptide (NT pro-BNP) is an excellent marker of heart
failure in adults. Serum levels can help differentiate dyspnea caused by
respiratory problems from heart failure, correlate with the severity of left
ventricular dysfunction and functional status, predict morbidity and mortality,
and can guide medical treatment. However, the value of measuring serum levels
of NT pro-BNP in children with heart failure still needs further study before
it can be recommended for clinical use [4].
Although
echocardiography is considered the gold standard for the detection of left
ventricular dysfunction, it is relatively expensive, is not often readily
available and may not always be diagnostic in acute presentation and user
dependent [4]. Hence, in this study we try to prove that when used in
conjunction with other clinical information, NT pro-BNP levels may be useful in
establishing or ruling out the diagnosis of heart failure in patients with
acute dyspnea.
NT
pro-BNP assay appears to hold promise as a potent and cost effective test of
choice for acutely dyspneic patients, which could replace chest x-ray and
echocardiography as first investigation in such patients in urgent care
settings. In this study, we hypothesize that changes in NT-proBNP serum levels
are associated with changes in echocardiographic indices of LV systolic
function [4].
Methodology
Type of Study- A
prospective cohort study
Place of study- The
study was conducted on 96 children presenting to the emergency room from
November 2011 to October 2013 at A.J. Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore.
Ethical committee clearance was taken from the institutional ethics committee
for the same.
Inclusion
criteria
All
children aged 7 days to 14 years who presented with acute dyspnea were included
in the study. Children were included after screening using Ross’ criteria for
heart failure. Ross’ criteria was used due to its usefulness as a standard
descriptor of respiratory symptoms in children.
Exclusion criteria- Children
who were diagnosed with sepsis, renal dysfunction defined as serum creatinine
> 1 mg/dl or that which requires therapy, other problems that were not
considered to be of cardiac or pulmonary etiology, anxiety or psychological
stress, gastroesophageal reflux disease, allergic reaction or cirrhosis,
obvious traumatic cause of dyspnoea.
Data and sample collection-
All
the patients were subjected to clinical history taking, a physical examination,
electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, routine blood investigations, NT pro-BNP
levels, chest radiography, and echocardiography. Routine blood investigation
were analysed including complete blood count, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte
sedimentation rate, renal function tests and blood culture. For NT pro-BNP
assay, 5ml specimen of venous blood was collected in EDTA tubes and analysed by
chemiluminescent immunoassay. The minimum value read by the triage kit is 5
pg/ml.
The
diagnosis of CHF was based on independent confirmation of the cardiologist and
results of echocardiography showing left ventricular dysfunction. Children with
left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 50 were considered to be having
cardiac failure. The following diagnostic tools were utilized to classify a
patient as having pulmonary disease and to subdivide them as type of pulmonary
disease: A chest X-ray without signs of heart enlargement or pulmonary venous
hypertension or a chest X-ray with signs of lung disease or reactive airway, normal
heart function as seen by echocardiography, a positive response to treatment
with steroids, nebulizers or antibiotics in the emergency department or
hospital, no admissions for CHF over the next 30 days.
Data analysis- Two
cohorts of children were evaluated. The cardiac cohort consisted of children
who were diagnosed by the cardiologist to have cardiac failure recognized by
left ventricular dysfunction on echocardiograph. The non-cardiac cohort
consisted of the remaining children who were diagnosed with respiratory illness
and no cardiac illness as confirmed by the cardiologist.
Statistical analysis- Data was analyses using SPSS version 17.0
statistical software. Spearman's Rank correlation coefficient was calculated
for Spearman’s test was applied for analysing relation between NT-pro BNP
levels and left ventricular ejection fraction. Pearson chi square test was used
for analysing categorical data. A probability of < 0.05 was taken as
significant.
Results
A
total of 98 children presented to the emergency room with respiratory distress
and fulfilling Ross’ criteria during the study period and were enrolled for the
study. 22 patients were excluded after the routine blood investigations. 12
were diagnosed with sepsis, 3 had distress neither due to cardiac or pulmonary
etiology, 5 had traumatic cause of dyspnea, 1 had an allergic reaction and 1
child had a high creatinine value. The remaining 76 were included in the study.
19 children were diagnosed with a cardiac disease in failure, 57 were diagnosed
with respiratory pathology. The minimum age included was 2.00 and the maximum
age was 350.00 months which corresponds to a mean of 40.98 months with a
standard deviation of 72.79 months.
The
NT pro-BNP values were estimated in all the children. The mean NT pro-BNP level
in the cardiac cohort was found to be 959.39 ± 220.22 pg/ml while in the
non-cardiac cohort it was found to be 191.79 ± 244.79 pg/ml. While comparing
mean NT pro-BNP levels in both cohorts, the level was found to be significantly
higher in the cardiac cohort than the non-cardiac cohort (p=0.001) as shown in
Table 1.
Table-1: Levels of NT pro-BNP in cardiac and
non-cardiac cohort
Group |
N |
Mean (pg/ml) |
Standard Deviation |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Cardiac |
19 |
959.39 |
220.22 |
85.00 |
1474.00 |
Respiratory |
57 |
191.79 |
244.79 |
42.00 |
1177.00 |
f =
0.6488, p value is <0.001
On
echocardiographic evaluation, all the children included in the cardiac cohort
had NT pro-BNP values ≥ 500 pg/ml. Among the children who had LVEF ≥50% (n=57),
50 (87.7%) had a NT pro-BNP level <500 pg/ml, 6 (10.5%) had a value between
500 and 1000 pg/ml and 1 (1.8%) of them had a value ≥1000pg/ml. The chi-square
was 22.713 and p value of <0.001 was obtained (Table 2).
Table-2: Relation of NT pro-BNP level to left
ventricular ejection fraction
NT pro-BNP level |
LVEF < 50 % |
LVEF ≥ 50% (n) |
||
N |
% |
n |
% |
|
<500
pg/dl |
0 |
0 |
50 |
87.7 |
500
– 1000 pg/dl |
10 |
52.6 |
6 |
10.5 |
>=1000
pg/dl |
9 |
47.4 |
1 |
1.8 |
Total |
19 |
100 |
57 |
100 |
chi-square
= 22.713, p value - <0.001
A
significant negative correlation was obtained between LVEF and NT pro-BNP such
that as the LVEF decreases, the NT pro-BNP level was found to be increasing (r
= -0.789, p = 0.001) (Figure 1).
Figure-1: Correlation between LVEF and NT
pro-BNP Correlation Coefficient - 0.789
Discussion
In
healthy infants and children, levels of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and
the N-terminal segment of its pro-hormone (NT pro-BNP) are elevated in the
first few days after birth. Thereafter, their levels decrease and remain
relatively constant throughout childhood. Infants and children with heart
disease that causes significant pressure or volume overload of the right or the
left ventricle have elevated BNP and NT-pro BNP levels [5]. The importance of
the NT pro-BNP level in the diagnosis and evaluation of heart failure has been
widely accepted in adults. The NT pro-BNP level has been observed to increase
with the abnormally high intra-ventricular pressure that is associated with
heart failure, and the level is positively correlated with the severity of
heart failure [6].
Studies
show that a normal NT pro-BNP level has a high negative predictive value for
heart failure. Natriuretic peptide levels in plasma correlated well with
biventricular volume. The left ventricle was considered to be the main source
of secreted natriuretic peptides in the patients with a pulmonary-to-systemic
flow ratio greater than 2 [7]. Elevation of BNP/pro-B-type NP are seen due to
long term exposure of right heart or left heart to volume and pressure
overload. These elevations are especially seen with diseases that causes left
ventricular volume overload when compared to right ventricular volume or
pressure overload. Furthermore, when comparing pediatric populations with
complex CHD vs simple cardiac defects
(ASD, VSD or PDA), on average, complex defects tend to have higher
concentrations [8].
An
accepted normal level of NT pro-BNP is considered to be < 300 pg/ml in
children with non-cardiogenic dyspnea. Lin et al, in their study, showed an
increased NT-proBNP level in 95% of the 80 children diagnosed with heart
failure according to the modified Ross criteria. Moreover, there were also
significant differences in the NT-proBNP levels among cases of mild, moderate
and severe heart failure [6]. According to a review done by Robert Ross in
2012, NT pro-BNP values for classifying heart failures ranges from 450 – 1700
pg/ml in various age groups.[9] However, in our study, all the children in the
cardiac cohort had high values of NT pro-BNP levels above 500 pg/ml out of
which 44% of them had a value above 1000 pg/ml. Rusconi et al determined that
an NT-proBNP value > 1,000 pg/mL identifies more symptomatic patients. Their
results indicated that increase in NT pro-BNP serum levels are associated with
echocardiographic signs of failure (lower LVEF, lower left ventricular
shortening fraction, higher left ventricular diastolic diameter, higher left
ventricular systolic diameter) and increased odds of being in NYHA/Ross classes
III or IV [4].
A
study done by Zhou et al between 2009 and 2012 with the mean age of their
subjects as 3.49 +- 0.23 years showed that the levels of NT pro-BNP reflected
the severity of heart failure and it is significantly up-regulated in the
condition. Their data reveals significantly higher values of NT pro-BNP in
children with heart disease as compared to those with pneumonia. The positive
rate of NT-proBNP was up to 100% in children with heart function above class
II, which suggested a positive correlation between NT-proBNP level, making it
an imperative index for the clinical diagnosis of heart failure and a suitable
tool for prognostic evaluation [10].
A
study done by Das et al compared the value of BNP in patients with diagnosis of
respiratory distress due to primary respiratory illness or infection vs new
diagnosis of CHD in an emergency room setting. A mean BNP value of 3290 pg/mL
was observed in a cohort of critically sick patients with a heart disease while
that in the children with respiratory infection/illness was a significantly
lower value of 17.4 pg/mL [11].
Studies
done by Cohen et al and Koulouri et al in 2005 and 2004 respectively report
similar findings that NT pro-BNP can differentiate between cardiac or pulmonary
etiologies for children presenting with dyspnea or respiratory distress
[12,13].
Iacob
et al enrolled 24 consecutive children with heart failure due to congenital
heart diseases and dilated cardiomyopathy and measured their serum levels of NT
pro-BNP and found a negative correlation with the ejection fraction of the left
ventricle(r = -0.165) [14]. Our study showed similar negative correlation
between LVEF and NT pro-BNP levels although we have included all children with
heart failure even without cardiomyopathy or underlying cardiac disease.
A
study done by Mir et al in their study showed that NT pro-BNP levels were
significantly higher in children with congestive heart failure than in control
children, negative correlation with the ejection fraction (r = −0.53) and a positive correlation with the clinical heart
failure score (r = 0.74). [MIR]
This is similar to the results obtained in our study which showed a
significantly higher mean NT pro-BNP level value in those children with
congestive heart failure which reflects the impairment of cardiac function in
children with congestive heart failure [15].
Several
studies have demonstrated that one third or more of patients presenting with
CHF have normal left ventricular systolic function [16,17,18]. These patients,
who most often have systemic hypertension, are believed to have heart failure
due to diastolic dysfunction [17].
The
limitations of this study include the assessment of only left ventricular
ejection fraction on echocardiograph for diagnosing heart failure. Probably
assessing other parameters of ventricular dysfunction will give a more accurate
result. Further studies on the difference in NT pro-BNP levels in mild,
moderate and severe ventricular dysfunction needs to be studied. Systolic and
diastolic dysfunctions were not differentiated in this study.
Conclusion
This
study showed that there is a significant difference in the NT pro-BNP levels of
patients with cardiac failure and those with respiratory etiology and also a
negative correlation between LVEF and NT pro-BNP levels. This proves that NT
pro-BNP can independently predict low left ventricular ejection fraction and in
turn heart failure. This method can be used to differentiate a cardiac failure
from a respiratory pathology in patients presenting with dyspnea as it is a
simple procedure not requiring the expertise of a cardiologist.
What this study adds to existing knowledge?
There
are not many studies done showing the diagnostic value of NT pro-BNP in
children. This study shows that although it is known that NT pro-BNP can be
used as a marker for cardiac failure in adults, the use in children is limited.
Values of NT pro-BNP have been researched but our study show a higher value can
be obtained in cardiac patients than the published norms.
Contribution of Authors
Dr.AswathyRajan
– Data collection, data analysis, manuscript drafting, editing
Dr.AshvijShriyan
– Manuscript drafting, editing
Dr.
Prem Alva – Data collection, data analysis, manuscript editing
Dr.
Santosh Soans – manuscript editing
Acknowledgements- None
Financial Support- None
Conflicts of Interest- None
Ethical Standards- The
authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the
ethical standards of the relevant national guidelines on human experimentation
and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008, and has been
approved by the institutional committee A.J. Ethics Committee.”
References
1.
Hsu DT, Pearson GD. Heart failure in children: part I: history,
etiology, and pathophysiology. Circ Heart Fail. 2009 Jan;2(1):63-70.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.820217.[pubmed]
2. Maher KO, Reed H,
Cuadrado A, Simsic J, Mahle WT, DeGuzman M et al. B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in
the Emergency Diagnosis of Critical Heart Disease in Children. Pediatrics, June
2008; 121(6):e1484-1488.DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-1856.
3. Hospital stays, hospital
charges, and in-hospital deaths among infants with selected birth
defects–United States, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56(2):25–29
4. Rusconi PG, Ludwig DA,
Ratnasamy C, Mas R, Harmon WG, Colan SD, Lipshultz SE. Serial measurements of
serum NT-proBNP as markers of left ventricular systolic function and remodeling
in children with heart failure. American heart journal. 2010 Oct
1;160(4):776-83
5. Nir A, Nasser N. Clinical value of NT-ProBNP and BNP in pediatric cardiology. J Card Fail. 2005 Jun;11(5 Suppl):S76-80.[pubmed]
6. Lin CW, Zeng XL, Jiang
SH, Wu T, Wang JP, Zhang JF, Ou YH. Role of the NT-proBNP level in the
diagnosis of pediatric heart failure and investigation of novel combined
diagnostic criteria. Experimental and therapeutic medicine. 2013 Oct
1;6(4):995-9.
7. Ootaki Y, Yamaguchi M,
Yoshimura N, Oka S, Yoshida M, Hasegawa T. Secretion of A-type and B-type
natriuretic peptides into the bloodstream and pericardial space in children
with congenital heart disease. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular
surgery. 2003 Nov 1;126(5):1411-6.
8. Fernandes BA, Maher KO,
Deshpande SR. Cardiac biomarkers in pediatric heart disease: A state of art
review. World journal of cardiology. 2016 Dec 26;8(12):719.[pubmed]
9.
Ross RD. The Ross classification for heart failure in children after 25
years: a review and an age-stratified revision. PediatrCardiol. 2012
Dec;33(8):1295-300. doi: 10.1007/s00246-012-0306-8. Epub 2012 Apr 5.[pubmed]
10.
Zhou FJ, Zhou CY, Tian YJ, et al. Diagnostic value of analysis of
H-FABP, NT-proBNP, and cTnI in heart function in children with
congenital heart disease and pneumonia. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci.
2014;18(10):1513-6.[pubmed]
11. Das S, Chanani NK,
Deshpande S, Maher KO. B-type natriuretic peptide in the recognition of
critical congenital heart disease in the newborn infant. PediatrEmerg Care
2012; 28: 735-738 [PMID: 22858747 DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182624a12]
12.
Cohen S, Springer C, Avital A, et al. Amino-terminal pro-brain-type
natriuretic peptide: heart or lung disease in pediatric respiratory
distress? Pediatrics. 2005 May;115(5):1347-50.
DOI:10.1542/peds.2004-1429.[pubmed]
13.
Koulouri S, Acherman RJ, Wong PC, et al. Utility of B-type natriuretic
peptide in differentiating congestive heart failure from lung disease
in pediatric patients with respiratory distress. PediatrCardiol. 2004
Jul-Aug;25(4):341-6. DOI:10.1007/s00246-003-0578-0.[pubmed]
14.
Iacob D, Butnariu A, Leucuţa DC, Samaşca G, Deleanu D, Lupan I.
Evaluation of NT-proBNP in children with heart failure younger than 3
years old. Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine. 2017 Jun
1;55(2):69-74.
15.
Mir TS, Marohn S, Läer S, et al. Plasma concentrations of
N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in control children from the
neonatal to adolescent period and in children with congestive heart
failure. Pediatrics. 2002 Dec;110(6):e76.[pubmed]
16.
Lubien E, DeMaria A, Krishnaswamy P, et al. Utility of B-natriuretic
peptide in detecting diastolic dysfunction: comparison with Doppler
velocity recordings. Circulation. 2002 Feb 5;105(5):595-601.[pubmed]
17.
Vasan RS, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Prevalence, clinical features and
prognosis of diastolic heart failure: an epidemiologic perspective. J
Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Dec;26(7):1565-74.
DOI:10.1016/0735-1097(95)00381-9
18. Bonow RO, Udelson JE. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction as a cause of congestive heart failure. Mechanisms and management. Ann Intern Med. 1992 Sep 15;117(6):502-10.[pubmed]
How to cite this article?
Aswathy Rajan, Shriyan Ashvij, Prem Alva, Santosh T Soans. Correlation between NT pro-b-type Natriuretic peptide and
left ventricular ejection fraction in children presenting with Dyspnea– a prospective cohort study. Int J Pediatr Res.
2018;5(11):569-574.doi:10.17511/ijpr.2018.11.04.