A study on acute disseminated
encephalomyelitis in children
Jena
P.K.1, Murmu M.C.², Priyadarshini D³
1Dr. Pradeep Kumar Jena, Associate Professor, ²Dr. Mangal Charan Murmu, Associate
Professor, ³Dr. Debashree Priyadarshini, Resident Doctor; all authors are affiliated
with Department of Paediatrics, S.C.B. Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
Correspondence
Author : Dr. Mangal Charan Murmu,
Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, S.C.B. Medical College,
Cuttack, Odisha, India. E-mail: mangal74murmu@yahoo.co.in
Abstract
Introduction: Acute
disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) is an acute demyelinating disorder of
central nervous system characterized by scattered focal / multifocal
inflammation of brain & spinal cord that usually follows an apparently
benign infection in otherwise healthy children & young adults. It
represents 30% of all childhood encephalitic illnesses. Material & Method: The study was conducted over a period of two
years from October 2016 to September 2018 at S C B Medical College, Cuttack.
The patient fulfilling the inclusion criteria were taken into study. Result: Early institution of with
immunosuppressive drugs hastens recovery and reduces morbidity. Despite the
serious neuropsychiatric manifestations ADEM in children generally has good
outcome. Children with ADEM need long term follow up for cognitive impairments
and emotional problems. Conclusion:
ADEM most commonly presently as an acute polysymptomatic encephalopathy and
initially diagnosis may not be clear. Clinical evaluation, MRI & CSF study
are most useful to establish the diagnosis and rule out important differential
diagnosis. Early institution of therapy with immunosuppressive therapy hasten
recovery and reduces mortality.
Keywords:
Encephalomyelitis, Demyelinating Diseases, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, corticosteroids.
Author Corrected: 16th May 2019 Accepted for Publication: 20th May 2019
Background
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)
is an acute demyelinating disorder of central nervous system characterized by
scattered focal / multifocal inflammation of brain & spinal cord that
usually follows an apparently benign infection in otherwise healthy children
& young adults. It represents 30% of all childhood encephalitic illnesses [1].
It is considered as an autoimmune disorder that is triggered by environment
stimulus in genetically susceptible individuals. It is usually presenting as a
monophasic disorder associated with multifocal neurological symptoms &
encephalopathy. In the past, ADEM commonly followed common childhood infection
like measles, chickenpox & smallpox. Because of significant advances in
infectious disease control & extensive immunisation coverage, nonspecific
upper respiratory illness are the most common triggering event in developing
countries, but the exact aetiological agent still remain unknown. But in
developing countries, the high frequency of vaccination & exanthematous
fever account for frequent occurrences of post infectious demyelinating diseases
[2]
In the past in the development countries, the
incidence rate of post infectious demyelinating disease was 1 in 10,000 out of
which 1 out of 1000 followed measles infection. Post vaccination
encephalomyelitis incidence rate was 1 in 25000 especially following duck
embryo anti rabies vaccination & following live measles vaccination was 1to
2 per one million³. The incidence of ADEM is estimated to be 0.4 per 100,000
per year [1].
However, very studies depict the exact
details of ADEM especially the diagnostic criteria, course of the disease &
final outcome. This study intends to analyse the epidemic variable, risk
factors, clinical course, laboratory, radiological finding & treatment, in
order to improve the diagnostic & treatment & to distinguish ADEM from
other aetiologies of encephalopathy.
Aim of the study
This present study has been undertaken with the following
aims and
Objectives
1. To know the incidence of ADEM among hospitalized
children. 2. To study the epidemiological factors associated. 3. To correlate
the mode and type of presentation with outcome. 4. To analyze the derangement
of various laboratory parameters 5. To review the neuro imaging findings in
detail and correlate with clinical picture & prognosis 6. To throw light on
various treatment modalities and study their efficacy. 7. Finally to assess
in-hospital morbidity and mortality & the clinical and imaging predictors
of in hospital outcome in a group of childrenwith the diagnosis of ADEM.
Material&Method
This is a prospective hospital based clinical
study conducted in the department of paediatrics at SVVPGIP & SCBMCH,
Cuttack. It is one of the tertiary care health centres in eastern Odisha, catering
to paediatric population from multiple districts of Odisha and additional
districts of neighbouring states of West Bengal, Bihar & Jharkhand. The
study was performed in close association with the department of Radio
diagnosis, Cardiology, Neurology, Pathology, Microbiology, Haematology and
Biochemistry over a period of two years from October 2016 to September 2018.
Permission was taken from the institutional ethical committee to conduct this
study.
Inclusion Criteria: Study group consisted of hospitalised
children < 15 years of age admitted to the indoors of SCB MCH & SVPPGIP,
Cuttack with the diagnosis of ADEM as per the defined criteria i.e.,1 Acute /
sub-acute onset of polysymptomatic² neurological presentation with
prominence of cortical signs (changes in mental status, seizures, acute
behavioural changes etc) preferably with a preceding history of infectious
illness or vaccination[1,2,3 4,5,6,7].2. Monophasic time course of illness. 3.
Signs & symptoms cannot be explained by other known aetiologies. 4. MRI
evidence of ADEM (bilateral asymmetric, multifocal, hyper intenselesions on
FLAIR or T2 weighted images predominantly involving white matter with or
without involvement of grey matter, thalamus & basal ganglia without
previous white matter changes) was considered corroborative [3,4,5].
Exclusion Criteria: 1. Recurrence of neurological signs &
symptoms beyond 3 months ofInitial illness. 2. Acute onset of flaccid paralysis
of limbs or isolated optic neuritis orisolated transverse myelitis. 3. Presence
of a significant preceding neurological abnormality or featuressuggestive of
neurodegenerative disorder.4. Signs & symptoms attributable to any systemic
involvement.
All these patients selected were first stabilised. Detailed
history and clinical examination special reference to central nervous system
was done. The level of consciousness was assessed using Glassgow coma scale.
Motor or sensory deficits were classified as partial or complete. The presence
of aphasia, hemi paresis and visual defect was evaluated whenever possible
according to child’s age. All associated symptoms like seizure, headache,
fever, altered level of consciousness were recorded.
Relevant investigations were performed to exclude
infective or inflammatory aetiologies which included complete blood count and
measurement of serum electrolytes,erythrocyte sedimentation rate and
Cerebrospinal fluid analysis (CSF). All patients had serological testing for
mycoplasma and various implicated virus as well as nasopharyngeal & rectal
culture. ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), real timePolymerase chain reaction
(PCR), conventional PCR were done to isolate the organism. A viral pathogen was
regarded as etiologic if one of the following criteria was met: 1.CSF &/or
serum contained virus specific IgM by ELISA.2. Raising IgG specific antibody
levels or relatively high single IgG specific antibody level.3. Positive PCR
result. Routine Lumbar puncture was done, taking into consideration
cardio-respiratory stability and after examining the fundus. CSF analysis was
done in term of cytological, biochemical, culture& sensitivity,
ADA(adenosine deaminase) assay and PCR study for isolating implicated viruses.
Neuroimaging was done in all patient after initial stabilisation. MRI (Magnetic
Resonance Imaging) was the imaging modality of choice. A 1.5-T seimens machine
was used for the brain MRI study.T1, T2, fluid attenuated inversion recovery
(FLAIR) and diffusion weighted images were obtained in the axial, sagittal and
coronal plane. When feasible, contrast enhanced images were obtained using
gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.1mmol/kg). CT (Computed Tomography) was done in
third generation scanner and contrast enhanced images were obtained in the
selected few cases. Scans were reviewed by neurologist who was blinded to the
clinical findings. The images were assessed for lesion site, size, number,
distribution, symmetry, any midline shift, haemorrhage and pattern of contrast
enhancement. Standard 30-minute interictal surface electroencephalophalogram (EEG)
was recorded in patients with impaired consciousness or seizures. These
differential levels of investigations are the standard protocol in the diagnostic
work up of patient with a neurological catastrophe and do not influence the
etiologic diagnosis. The incidence was defined as number of new cases of ADEM
admitted to the hospital which came into existence within certain period of
time per 100 patients admitted to the hospital. All those cases then segregated
as per age and gender. The mean age at onset is calculated and sex predilection
determined. The incidence of prodermal period and history of recent vaccination
was assessed. After neuroimaging study, the incidence of abnormal findings on
MRI/CT was calculated. Mode of onset mode of presentation i.e. the type of
deficit, cranial nerve involvement, and level of consciousness, seizures,
headache, and all the features then correlated with the immediate
outcome.Thorough history and a formal neurological examination to evaluate the
outcome in terms of full recovery, motor deficit, cognitive defect, visual
field defect, recurrent seizure, learning disorder, personality changes, psychiatric
manifestations, death etc.. Repeat brain imaging was arranged if there was
suggestion of progression or recurrence of neurological deficits. After ADEM
was diagnosed, all cases were treated with high dose intravenous
corticosteroids, either methyl prednisolone (10-30mg/kg) or dexamethasone (1mg/kg)
daily for 3-5days. Subsequently prednisolone (1mg/kg orally) was started and
continued for six weeks with gradual tapper. Plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin
(IVIG) (2mg/kg divided dose over 5days) or repeat high dose intravenous methyl
prednisolone were given for patient who continued to detoriate. Data thus
computed were analyzed and inferences drawn.
Analysis of data: Results were expressed as mean ± standard
deviation for continuous variables and as number (%) for categorical data.
Since all data were normally distributed, the parametric tests were used for
statistical analyses. The data was analyzed by SPSS version 21 software along
with below mentioned appropriate statistical tests at 5% level of significance.
p value is calculated using Chi-Square Test given by the formulaWhere Oi is
Observed frequency and Ei is Expected frequency. Significance was interpreted
as: 0.05<p<0.10 Suggestive of significance, 0.01<p<0.05 moderatelysignificant,
p<0.01 strongly significant.
Observation
Table-1: Age& Sex distribution of study
subjects
Age in year |
Sex |
|
|
Male |
Female |
||
0-4Years |
7 |
5 |
12 |
5-9years |
13 |
7 |
20 |
10-14years |
5 |
1 |
05 |
Total |
24 |
13 |
37 |
Age
distribution of study sample has been analyzed. It shows maximum prevalence in
5- 9 year age group (54.05%) with 32.43% in 0-4 year& 13.52 % in 10-14years
age group. Male predominates in the study 64.86% with female being 35.14%.
Table-2: Monthly distribution of study
subjects
Month |
No. |
% |
January |
6 |
16.3 |
February |
1 |
2.7 |
March |
2 |
5.4 |
April |
1 |
2.7 |
May |
1 |
2.7 |
June |
2 |
5.4 |
July |
5 |
13.5 |
August |
1 |
2.7 |
September |
4 |
10.8 |
October |
5 |
13.5 |
November |
5 |
13.5 |
December |
4 |
10.8 |
Total |
37 |
100.0 |
Maximum cases were seen in the month of
January.
Table-3: Presenting Symptoms (n=37)
Symptoms |
Number |
Percentage |
Convulsion |
24 |
64.9 |
Fever |
22 |
59.5 |
Altered sensorium |
21 |
56.8 |
Paralysis |
16 |
43.2 |
Vomiting |
9 |
24.3 |
Headache |
6 |
16.2 |
Speech abnormality |
6 |
16.2 |
Bowel & bladderchanges |
4 |
10.8 |
Abnormal movement |
3 |
8.1 |
Blurring of vision |
2 |
5.4 |
Rash |
2 |
5.4 |
Double vision |
1 |
2.7 |
Dysphagia |
1 |
2.7 |
Neck retraction |
1 |
2.7 |
Dizziness |
1 |
2.7 |
The
variety of symptoms presented by the study sample at the onset was analyzed
here. Seizures were documented to occur in highest no. Ofcases (64.9%).Next
fever (59.5%) & altered sensorium (56.8%) followed.
Table-4: Pattern of neurological involvement
Sign |
Number |
Percentage |
Motor
deficit |
25 |
67.7 |
Encephalopathy |
32 |
86.5 |
Autonomic
involvement |
15 |
40.5 |
Cranial
nerve involvement |
10 |
27 |
Cerebellar
sign |
8 |
21.6 |
Aphasia |
6 |
16.2 |
Meningeal
sign |
5 |
13.5 |
Involuntary
movement |
3 |
8.1 |
Encephalopathy was observed in 86.5%,
followed by motor deficit in67.6%& autonomicinvolvementin 40.5%.
Table-5: Pattern of MRI abnormality
MRI abnormality |
Number |
Percentage |
T1
hypointensity |
17 |
51.52 |
T2
hypointensity |
25 |
75.76 |
FLAIR
hyperintensity |
24 |
72.73 |
DWI
restriction |
16 |
48.48 |
Temporal
shrinkage |
5 |
15.15 |
Contrast
enhancement |
2 |
6.06 |
Gyral
thickening |
2 |
6.06 |
Sinusitis |
2 |
6.06 |
Perifocal
edema/mass effect |
1 |
3.03 |
T2hyperintensity
of spinal cord |
3 |
9.09 |
Normal |
1 |
3.03 |
Out of 37% cases, MRI was done in 33 cases,
CT scan was done in 1 case,3 could not be done. T1 hypointensity was observed
in 51.52%, T2 hypointensity in 75.76%,FLAIRS changes in 72.73% cases.
Table-6: Area of brain involved
Area of brain |
Number |
Percentage |
Fontal
lobe |
19 |
55.9 |
Temporal
lobe |
18 |
52.9 |
Parietal
lobe |
17 |
50 |
Occipital
lobe |
13 |
38.2 |
Thalamus |
6 |
17.6 |
Basal
ganglia |
5 |
14.7 |
Centrum
Semiovale |
5 |
14.7 |
Cerebellum |
4 |
11.8 |
Subcortex |
3 |
8.8 |
Corona
radiata |
3 |
8.8 |
Midbrain |
3 |
8.8 |
Pons |
2 |
5.9 |
Occipitoperitrigonal
region |
2 |
5.9 |
U
fibre |
1 |
2.9 |
Medulla |
1 |
2.9 |
Perisylvian
region |
1 |
2.9 |
Infrasylvian
region |
1 |
2.9 |
Cervical
cord |
1 |
2.9 |
Medullary
cord |
1 |
2.9 |
Entire
cord |
1 |
2.9 |
Meninges |
1 |
2.9 |
Frontal lobe was involved in maximum number of
cases (55.9%).
Table-7: Descriptive Statistic of
Cerebrospinal Fluid
CSF |
N |
Class |
Number |
Percentage |
Range |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Stddeviation |
Cell
Count |
35 |
<5 |
20 |
57.14 |
0 |
100 |
13.51 |
20.77 |
5-20 |
6 |
14.14 |
||||||
>20 |
9 |
25.71 |
||||||
Protein |
35 |
<45 |
25 |
71.43 |
15 |
135 |
57.86 |
25.35 |
>45 |
10 |
28.57 |
||||||
Sugar |
35 |
<⅔(50) |
24 |
68.57 |
0 |
102 |
59.43 |
21.12 |
>⅔(50) |
11 |
31.43 |
CSF was done in 35 out of 37 cases,
pleocytosis was observed in 42.85% cases, elevated protein in 71.43% cases
& low sugar in 31.43% cases.
Table-8: Response to treatment
Treatment |
Complete recovery |
Partial /No recovery |
Death |
Total |
||||
No |
% |
No |
% |
No |
% |
No |
% |
|
Steroid |
9 |
3 |
18 |
62 |
2 |
7 |
29 |
100 |
Steroid
+IVIG |
- |
- |
1 |
50 |
1 |
50 |
2 |
100 |
Only
Supportive treatment |
31 |
50 |
- |
- |
3 |
50 |
6 |
100 |
Steroid were given in only 29 number of
patient, steroid plus IVIG were given in 2 patient, only supportive treatment
were given in 6 out of 37 patients.
Table-9: Pattern of sequelae on follow up
(n=17).
Sequelae |
Number |
Percentage |
Seizure |
9 |
52.9 |
Motor
deficit |
8 |
47 |
Cognitive
dysfunction |
4 |
23.5 |
Behavioural
disorder |
4 |
23.5 |
Dysphasia |
3 |
17.6 |
Dysphasia |
1 |
5.9 |
Out of 17 children with sequelae, epilepsy
was predominantly seen 52.9% of cases.Motor deficit is seen in 47 % of cases.
Table-10: Association of predisposing factor
with respect to age, severity of presentation, outcome.
Age gp years |
Predisposing
factor |
Severity of
presentation |
Outcome |
|||||||||||||
Present |
Absent |
Mild |
Moderate |
Severe |
Complete |
Partial |
Death |
|||||||||
No |
% |
No |
% |
No |
% |
No |
% |
No |
% |
No |
% |
No |
% |
No |
% |
|
0-4 |
9 |
81.8 |
2 |
18.2 |
2 |
16.66 |
5 |
41.67 |
5 |
41.67 |
3 |
25 |
8 |
40 |
1 |
20 |
5-9 |
8 |
47.1 |
9 |
52.9 |
6 |
30 |
6 |
30 |
8 |
40 |
7 |
58.33 |
9 |
45 |
4 |
80 |
10-14 |
4 |
80 |
1 |
20 |
1 |
20 |
3 |
60 |
1 |
20 |
2 |
16.67 |
3 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
Total |
21 |
63.6 |
12 |
27.4 |
9 |
24.32 |
14 |
37.84 |
14 |
37.84 |
12 |
100 |
20 |
100 |
5 |
100 |
Chi square=4.947, p=048in predisposing
factor, chi square =1.612,p=0.807 inseverity of presentation, chi square
=2.372, p=0.668outcome at discharge.
*Predisposing factors [Respiratory infection (38%),
Nonspecific fever (19.1%), GI infection (9.5%),UTI (9.5%), CNS infection
(9.5%), Measles (4.8%), Mumps (4.8%), appendicitis (4.8%)].
Although the prevalence of predisposing
factor seems to be higher in 0-4years age group, it is not confirmed statistically.
It seems that 0-4 years had mostly moderate to severe presentation and 5-9 year
age group had mostly severe presentation. Statistically significant association
could not be established. There is no statistically significance as seen with outcome
at discharge.
Table-11: Association of severity of
presentation with outcome at discharge.
|
Glassgow coma score |
Total |
||||||
Outcome
at discharge |
Mild |
Moderate |
Severe |
|||||
No |
% |
No |
% |
No |
% |
No |
% |
|
Complete
recovery |
5 |
55.56 |
4 |
28.57 |
3 |
21.43 |
12 |
32.43 |
Partial
or no recovery |
4 |
44.44 |
10 |
71.43 |
6 |
42.86 |
20 |
54.05 |
Death
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
35.71 |
5 |
13.51 |
Total |
9 |
100 |
14 |
100 |
14 |
100 |
37 |
100 |
Chi square =11.54, p=0.021
It was observed that the cases with severe
presentation had lower proportion of recovery (21.43%) & higher proportion
of mortality (35.71%) which was found to be statistically significant.
Discussion
37 children were included into the study who
have evidence of CNS demylination; 36 fulfilled the criteria for first episode
of ADEM & 1 was diagnosed as multiple sclerosis. Out of 10701 indoor
admissions during period ADEM constituted 0.33% of admitted cases.
ADEM was found in all age group of children
with early childhood predominance. The youngest was 45 days old infant and
oldest was 14 years old. The peak incidence was observed in 5-9 years age group
with mean age presentation being 5.2 years ± 3.44. Studies in the past have
reported comparable findings [3,5,8]. Boys constituted 65% of the children in
the present study and girls constituted 35%. Studies from India and abroad have
reported that ADEM is more common in boys, while multiple sclerosis is more
common in girls[4,5]. Cases occurred throughout the year with predominance in
the month of January whichwere comparable to the western data where
predominance during winter and spring is reported[3,4].
The clinical feature of ADEM in the present
sample were comparable to those of previous reports. Seizures (65%) followed by
fever (60%)and altered sensorium (57%) were most common presenting symptoms [3,4,9,10].
Encephalopathy (87%) and motor deficit (68%) were most frequent neurological
finding.
MRI is of central importance in the diagnosis
of acute CNS white matter disorder. CT is frequently normal in ADEM (Dunn et al
1986[11], caldemeyer et al 1994[12]). About 05 patient in our study had CT scan
done that showed features suggestive of demyelination in 4 patients.
Abnormalities of brain MRI have been shown to be predictive of the development
of multiple sclerosis in adults. In clinically isolated syndromes an abnormal
MRI brainon presentation was associated with progression of multiple sclerosis
in 83% of patients during last10years of follow up (O’Riordan et al 1998)[13].
Normal MRI was associated with progression to multiple sclerosis in our only
patient during the study period. 33 out of 37 children in this study group had
MRI done which was abnormal in presentation in all except one. T1 hypointensity
was noted in 52% cases and T2 & FLAIR hyper intensity was noted in 76%
cases. Temporal shrinkage was noted in 05 patient (15%), contrast enhancement
in 2(6%) & gyral thickening in 2(6%) Lobes of the brain were the most
common area to be involved out of which fontal is the most frequent (56%). T2
hyperintensity of spinal cord was noted in three of our patients who had a
screening MRI spine done, entire cord is involved in one, cervical in one and
medulla in one. Review of multiple sclerosis in the children in past have
documented the predominance of periventricular lesions (near universal),
particularly at the trigone and the body of lateral ventricle (Alper G et al
2009)[14]. Cortical grey lesions were infrequent. Involvement of deep grey
matter was also seen occurring in 32% cases of our study which may be the only
imaging finding in ADEM (Baum et al 1994[15], Kimura et al 1996[16]). The
asymmetry found in the white matter lesions are characteristics of acquired
demyelinating lesion. Symmetrical white matter abnormalities should prompt
consideration of leucody strophy. In contrast the deep grey matter
abnormalities in ADEM are frequently symmetrical. Thalamic involvement was seen
in 18% of cases, which can be up to 40% as per previous studies [3,4,12,17].
Evidence of CSF inflammations in the form of
pleocytosis (43%) and elevated protein (71%) was seen which was described in
28-65% of studied casesof ADEM[3,4,18]. CSF opening pressure was normal in
almost all cases baring a few. Cells were moderately elevated with mean cell
countbeing 14/cumm ranging from 0-100/ cumm which were predominantly
mononuclear.
Current opinion supports the use of
intravenous methyl prednisolone followed by oral prednisolone therapy when
infective encephalitis has been excluded and acute post infectious
demyelination is suspected. Notably, however some children appear to recover
fully without any therapeutic intervention, but recovery is usually incomplete
[19,20]. No therapy (only supportive) was given in 6 patients in our study,
some due to fulminant presentation that hardly give any time for intervention.
Out of 31 patients who were treated only steroid was given in 29 of them and
combined therapy of steroid &IVIG was given in 2.Therapeutic intervention
was random, but previous studies have shown efficacy of various therapeutic
modalities in specific area of involvement [21].
On follow up, complete recovery was seen in
11 subjects (38%); sequelae were found in 17 subjects (59%); 1 succumbed. 3
patients were lost to follow up. Out of 12 patient who had recovered completely
at the time of discharge, 2 had sequelae in the form of behavioural problem and
need for anti-epileptic drugs. Out of 20 patients who had partial or no
recovery at the time of discharge ,1 succumbed,2 had complete recovery, residual
neurological deficit were seen in rest others in the form of cognitive
dysfunction, recurrent seizures, motor deficit, behavioural problem, dysphasia
& dysphagia. Predominant sequelae observed were recurrent seizures (53%)
& moor deficit (47%). In patient who had complete recovery, the recovery
period ranged from 8days to maximum 3 months, recovery may continue from weeks
to months as per previous studies [22].
The preceding illness were described as upper
respiratory tract infection(8), nonspecific fever (4),GI infection (2), UTI
(2), CNS infection (2), measles (1), mumps (1) and appendicitis (1), the
majority of patient had a preceding history of upper respiratory tract(38%) as
per previous studies [23,24]. The prevalenceof antecedent illness was mostly
observed below 10 years of age (81%) with predominance of 0-4 years age group,
the association could not be held statistically significant (p=0.084), this
study needs with larger sample to comment on a definite association. In
previous studies,the lack of prodrome has been observed >30% of adolescent
cases [12]. The prevalence of preceding illness is usually less described in
multiple sclerosis (R C Dale et al 2000)[4]. The association of age with
severity of presentation do not have statistically significant value, need a
larger sample. Also the outcome at discharge do not have any statistical
significance.
The cases with severity of presentation had
lower proportion of complete recovery (21.43%) & higher proportion of
mortality (35.71%) than the cases with mild and moderate presentation. Similarly,
the cases with moderate degree of presentation had lower rate of complete
recovery (28.57%) than those with mild presentation (55.56%), this indicates
that the severity of presentation was inversely proportional to recovery at
discharge. It was proved to be statistically significant through chi-square
test of association with p value =0.021.
Conclusion
ADEM
most commonly present as a polysymptomatic encephalopathy and initially
diagnosis may not be clear. Clinical evaluation, MRI & CSF studies are most
useful to establish the diagnosis and rule out important differential
diagnosis. There is presence of antecedent illness in case of severe
presentation. The age, gender, predisposing factor do not influence the
outcome, but the severity of presentation influence the outcome at discharge.
Early institution of therapy with immunosuppressive drugs hasten recovery and
reduces morbidity as evidence by the study done by Rust RS et al [19], Francis
GS et al [20], Ravaglia S [21].
The two largest reviews found that
disabilities was mild (defined as extended disability score of <4) in 40 and
60% of patients in 8 to10 years of follow up respectively (Dequet et al
1987[25], Ghezee et al 1997[26]) Children with ADEM need long term follow up
for cognitive impairment and emotional problems as described by Boutin et al
1988 [27]. More than half of ADEM case had preceding illness including some
vaccine preventable disease which could be prevented by proper vaccination.
What this study adds to existing knowledge?: Inadvertent short course use of steroid
therapy is responsible for relapse and subsequent appearance of new symptoms.
This study high lights the importance that malaria should be added to the list
of infections able to precipitate ADEM. However, large prospective studies are
required to address the aetio-pathogenesis.
References
How to cite this article?
Jena P.K, Murmu M.C, Priyadarshini D. A study on acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in children. Int J Pediatr Res. 2019;6(05):214-223.doi:10.17511/ijpr.2019.i05.04