Adolescent violence: the genesis

Agarwal A.K.1, Agarwal M.2, Verma A.3, Singh S.K.4

1Dr. Anand K. Agarwal, Professor & Head, Pediatrics, 2Dr. Manisha Agarwal, Professor & Head, Obst. & Gynae, Saraswati Medical College, Unnao, 3Dr. Ashish Verma, Associate Professor, Pediatrics, Career Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 4Dr. Santosh K. Singh, Assistant Professor, Pediatrics, Saraswati Medical College, Unnao; 1,2,4authors are affiliated with Saraswati Medical College, Unnao, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Corresponding Author: Dr. Manisha Agarwal, B6/212, Sri Nath Ji Vihar, Nirala Nagar Ext., Sitapur Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. E-mail: manishaagarwal60@gmail.com


Abstract

Introduction: Recently the “Blue Whale Experience” has put the adolescents on fire. The surge in adolescent violence has become a matter of great concern in the last few decades. The inter-personal conflict builds the foundation block, which generates the spark of violence, if it is not resolved in gentleman manner. A dance between genes and environmental experiences really shape the child’s developing brain. A rapid period of brain development can be fostered by quality of responsiveness of caregivers and community environment. Numerous studies uncover a link between cognitive skills and adolescent violence. In the light of these facts this study was designed to know the environmental factors which correlate with the indulgence of violence. Material and Method: 480 students aged 10-18 years were surveyed regarding the indulgence in violence during last one year. The characteristics of different interacting environmental factors were also drilled. Results: The prevalence of violent act was 27.91% in which boys and girls were 13.75% and 14.16% respectively. Boys were outnumbered than girls as perpetrators while girls were victimized more. The interacting proximal environmental factors viz upper lower SES, mother and father education <high school, nuclear family and staying with both parents and the peer influence reflected in the habits of alcohol, smoking and tobacco chewing, TV watch >2hr and academic failure which correlate with the indulgence in violence of students in our study point an inappropriate and low quality responsiveness. Which are perceived by the adolescents during their early years of life. These children react according to such memory and cognition in any situation inappropriately ie antisocially and indulge themselves in violence during their adolescence. They accept a socially disapproved ideology to form a negative identity formation. Discussion: These factors can be used at school level to mark the students at risk to offer the available preventive tools to achieve the best results.

 Key words: Adolescent violence, Genesis, Environmental responsiveness


Manuscript received: 4th May 2019 Reviewed: 14th May 2019 

Author Corrected: 20th May 2019 Accepted for Publication: 25th May 2019

Introduction

Recently the “Blue Whale Experience” has put the adolescents on fire. The surge in adolescent violence has become a matter of great concern in the last few decades. Violence has been declared as a leading public issue [1]. The inter-personal conflict builds the foundation block, which generates the spark of violence, if it is not resolved in decent manner. Violence is defined by the World Health Organization in the WRVH as “the intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community that either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, maldevelopment or deprivation [2].

The spectrum of violence ranges from the verbal harshness to the cold-blooded murder. The degree of offence depends upon the perpetrator’s mind content while the tolerance or reaction of aggression by victim reflects one’s maladjusted mindset [3].

The ‘storm and stress’ concept of adolescent development depicts adolescence as a time of turmoil and angst (anxiety and depression), really derives from 18th and 19th century Romanticism and utilized in the developmental theories of psychoanalysis [4,5].

Erikson believed that the most important and the first conflict is faced by an adolescent in the life is an identity crisis. It is the time of intensive analysis and exploration of different ways of looking at oneself.

Early childhood is a period in development where environment basically has an important impact on determining how the brain grows and develop. Environment affects not only the number of brain cells and number of connections among them but also the way these connections are ‘wired’.

The process of elementary excess neurons and synapses from dense, immature brain, which continues well into adolescence, is most dramatic in early years of life and it is guided to a large extent by child’s sensory experience of the outside world [6]. Scientific evidence suggests that if the brain does not receive the appropriate stimulation during this crucial window, it is very difficult for brain to rewire itself at the time [7].

A dance between genes and environmental experiences really shape the child’s developing brain. Early interactive experience with environment and the complex interplay of genes have a decisive impact on the architecture of brain. Early interaction doesn’t create a context; they directly affect the way that brain is ‘wired’. A rapid period of brain development can be fostered by quality of responsiveness of caregivers and community environment [8].

Kolb reported that the caregiver’s behavior is transferred to the child epigenetically and affects the lifelong health. Managing the factors that affect brain development is similar to an insurance policy that is only available early in life [9]. When caregivers are sensitive and responsive to a young child’s signals and needs, they provide an environment rich in serve and return experiences [10]. The environmental expression of developed ability is muted in disadvantaged contexts [11]. Numerous studies uncover a link between cognitive skills and adolescent violence [11, 12, 13].

In the light of these facts this study was designed to know the factors which decline the quality of interaction between the child and environment which ultimately transforms the adolescent’s mind into a violent state.

Aims & Objectives

1. To know the prevalence of adolescent violence

2. To explore the environmental factors which correlate with adolescent violence

Material and Method

Setting: The study was conducted in two schools Career convent school and Career inter college at Lucknow district during study period.

Type of study: A cross-sectional survey was conducted by using a pretested self-report questionnaire [13, 14]. This was administered to 480 students aged 10-18 years of urban schools.

Sampling method: The convenient sampling technique was adopted for the present study. Sample size was 480.

Sampling technique: Simple random sampling technique used for the study

Inclusion Criteria: The study includes:

·   Adolescent Students of selected schools.

·   Who were willing to take part in the study

·   Who were able to understand Hindi or English

Exclusion Criteria: The study excludes:

• Adolescents who were not a resident of Lucknow district

• Adolescents who are not willing to participate in the study.

Statistical Analysis: Descriptive statistical method was used for data analysis. Frequency, percentage distribution, was used for physical violence experienced or done personally over the last one year.

Ethical consideration: Permission was taken from the ethical committee of the institute before starting the study. Permission was taken from the principals of the schools before starting the study in school. Verbal consent was taken from all the participants before starting study.

The characteristics of different interacting environmental factors were explored. The process was done in a sensitive and confidential manner. All respondents were stressed at the time of questioning that they should respond `yes` only in the case of non-play situations. A two point scale (yes / no) was used to know the details.

Results

The prevalence of adolescent violence was 27.91 %. About 15.83% was of 10-14 years while 12.08% was of 14-18 years. (Table 1). The interacting proximal environmental factors which correlate with the indulgence in violence of students found in our study are upper lower SES (43.28%), mother and father education <high school (61.19% & 49.25%), nuclear family and staying with both parents (74.62% & 54%). The peer influence reflected in the habits of smoking, alcohol, tobacco chewing and TV watch >2hr 73.13%, 47.76%, 5.9% and 67.16% respectively. Their failure in academics was found in 53.73% (Table II, III).

 Alternate

(n=480)

 

Figure-1: Population and Sex Distribution

Table-I: Prevalence of violence (n=480)

Age group

Involved in violence

10-14yr

76 (15.83%)

>14-18yr

58 (12.08%)

Total

134 (27.91%)

Alternate

Figure-2: Socio-Economic Status (SES) of students involved in violence

According to modified Kuppuswamy classification 1962

Table-II: Father& Mother’s Education of students involved in violence

S No

 

Father Education

Mother Education

n

%

n

%

1

<High School

66

49.25%

82

61.19%

2

High School

44

32.83%

34

25.37%

3

Graduate

18

13.43%

14

10.44%

4

Post-Graduate

06

04.47%

04

02.98%

 

Total

134

100%

134

100%

Table-III: Interacting Environmental factors

1.

Family type

Nuclear

100  74.63%

Joint

35   25.37%

2.

Staying with

Both parents

54   40.29%

With father

__     __

With mother

18  13.43%

With relatives

26  19.40%

Alone

36  26.86%

3.

Academic performance

>40%

24  17.91%

<40%

72  53.73%

Failed

38  28.35%

4.

TV watch

<1 hr

10  7.46%

1-2 hr

34  25.37%

> 2 hr

90  67.16%

5

Habits

Smoking

64  47.76%

Alcohol

42  31.34%

Tobacco Chewing

18 13.43%

Table-IV: Interacting Environmental factors which decrease the quality of responsiveness: correlated with Violence

 

Environmental Factors which respond in low quality of responsiveness

Highest Involvement in Violence

1.

Socio- Eco. Status Upper-Low

43.28% (58)

2.

Father’s Education<High School

49.25% (66)

3,

Mother’s Education <High School

61.19% (82)

4.

Alcohol

31.34% (42)

5.

Smoking

47.76% (64)

6.

Family Type Nuclear

74.62% (100)

7.

Staying with Both parents

40.29% (54)

8.

Academic Performance< 40%

53.73% (72)

9.

TV watch >2 hr

67.16% (90)

Discussion

The prevalence of violence was found 27.91%, which was on lower side when compared to 53% by Cross-Tab Marketing Services & Telecommunications Research Group for Microsoft Corporation [15,16,], 33% in national CDC survey [17]. It was higher when compared to Sharma et.al. 13.5%, Deb et.al. 8% to 21% and 15% to 25% adolescent involvement in violence [18,19, 20]. The interactive quality of parents and other proximal environmental factors inevitably adjusts, improves or declines as children mature over long periods of time [21,22]. The interacting proximal environmental factors viz upper lower SES, mother and father education <high school, nuclear family and staying with both parents and the peer influence reflected in the habits of alcohol, smoking and tobacco chewing, TV watch >2hr and academic failure, correlate with the indulgence in violence of students in our study point an inappropriate and low quality responsiveness of environment. The early years matter because the interaction between early experience and gene expression shapes the maturing architecture of the mind.

A major ingredient in this developmental process is the serve and return interaction between children and their parents and other caregivers in the family or community. Healthy brain architecture depends on a sturdy foundation built by appropriate input from a child’s senses and stable, responsive relationships with caring adults and environment. If the responses to a child are unrealistic, inappropriate, or simply absent, the developing architecture of the brain may be disrupted, and subsequent physical, mental, and emotional health may be impaired [10].

The adverse experiences early in life can impair brain architecture, with negative effects lasting into adulthood [23].

There are many different theories of information processing that focus on different aspects of perceiving, remembering, and reasoning. One of the most important agreements is that elaboration is a key to permanently storing information in a way that facilitates its quick retrieval when it is needed [24].

Cognitive information processing (CIP) theory is often referred to as simply "information processing." Information processing is not really the name of a single theory; it is a generic name applied to various theoretical perspectives dealing with the sequence and execution of cognitive events [25].
The low quality or inappropriate responsiveness is perceived by children during their early years of life, reflects in their attitude at their
adolescent age. Many young children who are physically and/or emotionally bullied become aggressive or vice versa. [26]. These children may face a multitude of adjustment issues at adolescence and unable to resolve the identity crisis for their good which leads towards the negative identity formation [22]. The spectrum of responses received from the environment is lodged in the minds of children conveyed from different paths of stimuli from prenatal to adolescent stage compile at their adolescence and form their attitude.

The conclusion of Boer's PhD thesis was that, smooth child mental development requires good interaction between the brains of mother and child antenatally [27]. 

These children act in any situation inappropriately i.e. Antisocially and indulges themselves in violence during their adolescence according to such memory and cognition developed in response of inappropriate or low quality responsiveness of the environment [21]. Their mind is inappropriately wired which makes them incapable to resolve the crisis at this vital age of expression and responsibility [13]. The resolution of the adolescent identity crisis has a profound influence the subsequent development [28].

Thus, they accept a socially disapproved ideology to form a negative identity formation inclined towards violence [29]. 

Conclusion

The quality of environmental responsiveness in the process of interaction decides the way in which adolescent would resolve the crisis at this crucial age. The inappropriate or violent responsiveness finally forms an inappropriate or aggressive attitude of the adolescent. Under the umbrella of such attitude adolescent reacts in volatile manner in any situation.

These factors can be used in school to mark the students at risk to offer the available preventive tools to achieve the best results.

There is further corollary to utilize findings to suggest implementation of corrective and preventive measures by social groups, school authorities, parents, and law enforcement agencies and if needed the legal authorities to step in and invoke their influence to halt this social rot.

What this study adds to existing knowledge: The low quality or inappropriate responsiveness of the environment is perceived by children during their early years of life, reflects in their attitude at their adolescense and they react negatively / violently when they face the society.

References

1. Merrick J, Kandel I, Vardi G. Trends in adolescent violence. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2003 Jul-Sep;15(3): 285-7.[pubmed]

2. Krug EG, Mercy JA, Dahlberg LL, et al. The world report on violence and health. Lancet. 2002 Oct 5;360(9339):1083-8.[pubmed]

3. Smith-Khuri E, Ronaldo I. Across-national study of violence related behaviors in adolescents.JAMAPaediatricsjune 1, 2004, Vol 158, No. 6, Pages 510-608.doi:10.1001/archpedi.158.6.539.

4. Lai DW. Violence exposure and mental health of adolescents in small towns: an exploratory study. Can J Public Health. 1999 May-Jun;90(3):181-5.[pubmed]

5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Violence-related behaviors among high school students--United States, 1991-2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004 Jul 30;53(29):651-5.[pubmed]

6. Carol Bellamy. The state of the world’s children 2001. NY, USA: UNICEF; https://www. unicef.org (accessed21 Nov 2018).

7. Early Childhood Development.https://www.worldbank.org.(accessed 20 Nov 2018)

8. Paul E. Bellair& Thomas L. McNulty (2010) Cognitive Skills, Adolescent Violence, and the Moderating Role of Neighborhood Disadvantage, Justice Quarterly, 27:4, 538-559, DOI: 10.1080/07418820903130823

9. Carone N, Lingiardi V, Chirumbolo A, et al. Italian gay father families formed by surrogacy: Parenting, stigmatization, and children's psychological adjustment. Dev Psychol. 2018 Oct;54(10):1904-1916. doi: 10.1037/dev0000571.[pubmed]

10. Serve and return theory.Centre on developing child. Harvard University. https://developingchild. harvard.edu.(accessed 12 April 2018)

11.  Rose Erickson, Parents' Effect on Child Behavior.www.livestrong.com (accessed25 September 2018)

12. Information processing theory.https://en.wikipedia.org (accessed 22 September 2018).

13. Agarwal AK, Verma A, Adolescent Violence: Pointers of Perpetrators, Paripex-Indian journal of Research 2017;5:54-55https://wwjournals.com/index.php/pijr/article/view/692.

14. Agarwal AK, Verma A, Agarwal M. Adolescent Violence: Proneness Factors of Victims. Ind J Youth Adol Health 2017; 4(2): 12-16.DOI.10.24321/2349.2880.201709

15. What Causes Teen Violence - Teen Violence. https://www.teenhelp.com on (accessed on 20Aug 2017).

16. Online Bullying Among Youth 8-17 Years Old – India Cross-Tab Marketing Services & Telecommunications Research Group for Microsoft Corporation. http//download.microsoft.com (accessed 21 Dec 2016).

17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2011. MMWR, Surveillance Summaries 2012;61(no.SS-4).www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/ss/ss6104.pdf.(accessed 22 Feb2017).

18. Sharma MK1, Marimuthu P. Prevalence and psychosocial factors of aggression among youth. Indian J Psychol Med. 2014 Jan;36(1):48-53. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.127249.[pubmed]

19. Deb S, Modak S. Prevalence of violence against children in families in Tripura and its relationship with socio-economic factors. J Inj Violence Res. 2010 Jan;2(1):5-18. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v2i1.31.[pubmed]

20. Ziggy’s Blog: Teen Trends: Teen Violence On The Rise!.http://ziggysblogs.blogspot.com /2011/09/teen-trends-teen-violence-on-rise.htm (accessed 16 Feb 2019).

21. Miller E, McCauley H, Virata MC, Decker M, et al. Coaching boys into men: Preliminary success of a sexual violence prevention program. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2011;48:S85–S86.

22. Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the Context of the Family: Parent-Child Interaction. In P. H. Mussen,& E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, Personality, and Social Development (pp. 1-101). New York: Wiley..

23. Brain Architecture.Centre on developing child. Harvard University. https://developingchild. harvard.edu.(accessed 12 Jan 2019).

24. Huitt, W. (2003). The information processing approach to cognition. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/ cognition/infoproc.html (accessed on 2 Mar 2019)

25. Cognitive Information Processing Theory. http://www.expertlearners.com (accessed on 20 April2019).

26. Calbo, A. S., Busnello, F. B., Rigoli, M. M., Schaefer, L. S., & Kristensen, C. H. (2009). Bullying na escola: comportamento agressivo, vitimização e conduta pró-social entre pares [Bullying at school: Aggressive behavior, victimization, and prosocial behavior among peers]. ContextosClínicos, 2, 73-80. doi:10.4013/ctc.2009.22.01

27. Human behavior: Development in adolescence. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com (accessed on 25th july2018).

28. Angela oswalt, Early Childhood Emotional And Social Development: Identity And Self-Esteem,https://www.mentalhelp.net(accessed on 23rd Feb 2019).

29. Teeter E, Phyllis A, Semrud-C, Assessment and Interventions for Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Child Neuropsychology. 2nd edition.89-103.

How to cite this article?

Agarwal A.K, Agarwal M., Verma A, Singh S.K. Adolescent violence: the genesis. Int J Pediatr Res. 2019;6(05):239- 245.doi:10.17511/ijpr.2019.i05.08