Transcatheter
closure of patent ductus arteriosus in children weighing 5 kg or less: Initial
experience
Shaad A.1, Kamran MirzaM.2,
Shahzad A.3, Azam
H.4, Gauhar S.5, Izhar fazil M.6
1Dr. Abqari Shaad, Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, 2Dr.
Kamran Mirza M, Assistant Professor, Pediatric Cardiology, PCE CS Unit, 3Dr.
Alam Shahzad, Assistant Professor, Pediatric, Intensive Care, PCE CS Unit, 4Dr.
Haseen Azam, Associate Professor, Department of CTVS, 5Dr. Shamim
Gauhar, Assistant Professor, Cardiac Anesthesia, PCE CS Unit, 6Dr.
Izhar fazil M., Department
of Pediatrics; all authors are affiliated with JNMCH, AMU, Aligarh, Uttar
Pradesh, India.
Corresponding Author: Dr. Mirza Mohd Kamran, PCE-CS Unit JNMCH, AMU,Aligarh,
Uttar Pradesh, India. E-mail: kamran16paeds@gmail.com
Abstract
Introduction: Trans-catheter closure (TCC) of patent
ductus arteriosus (PDAs) is a well-establishednon-surgical method of closure. Objectives: To evaluate safety,
feasibility & complicationsof device closure of patent ductus arteriosus
(PDA) in small children weighing ≤ 5 kg with different types of devices for
closure. Methods: patients with PDA
underwent transcatheter closure, among whom 16 (33%) weighed 5 kg or less. All
of these patients underwent transcatheter closure of PDA using an Amplatzer
duct occluder I, Amplatzer duct occluder II or Amplatzer duct occluder 2 IIAS (Additional
size) devices. Results: Sixteen patients
(9 females & 7 males) between theages 20 days to 16 months had undergone
device closures. Amplatzer Duct Occluder (ADOI) was used in 12 cases, 3 were
closed with Amplatzer Duct Occluder (ADO2) and one the smallest of all (1.6 kg)
patientwere selected for closure with Amplatzer Duct Occluder (ADO2 AS).At 1
month after the closure, the signs and symptoms improved markedly in all
patients, and PDAs were completely closed and devices remained in situ on
follow-up. Mild obstruction of left pulmonary artery (n=2) and aortic isthmus
flow (n=1) was noted at the time of discharge which gradually improved on
follow up. Conclusions: TCC of PDAin
small babies 5 kg or less is feasible & safe alternative to surgical PDA
closure in carefully selected patients. The immediate & short-term outcomes
have proven this method to be safe & valid.
Keywords: Congenital heart disease, Patent ductus
arteriosus (PDA), Device closure
Author Corrected: 7th May 2019 Accepted for Publication: 12th May 2019
Introduction
Patent
ductus arteriosus (PDA) is a common form of CHD, accounts for approximately8%
of congenital heart disease with the incidence of one in 2500 to 5000 live births
[1]. PDA is defined as persistent patency in term infants even after three months
[2]. It may be asymptomatic and is sometimes not diagnosed early resulting into
prolongedabnormalaorto-pulmonary shunt which may result in silently progressing
hypertension and left ventricular dysfunction. The presence of volume
overloading of the left atrium and left ventricle is an indication for closure
of the defect. The shape of the PDA varies; a classification was given by
Krichencko et al. [3]. Since the
first percutaneous closure of PDA performed by Porstmann in 1968, various
devices and coils have been introduced into clinical practice. Although,
advances in transcatheter techniques have been made, there is lack of data on
patient selection, technical issues, complications, and mid to long term
outcomes especially in very small patients. [4,5,6]. In this report, we present
our early experiences with and the short-term outcomes of closure of PDA in children 5 kg or less using various
devices.
Materials and Methods
The study was done at a tertiary level hospital having pediatric cardiac
unit with dedicated Pediatric cardiac catheterisation lab.
Type of study: This is a retrospective study where relevant
data were obtained from the case files and cardiac catheterization records.
Sampling Method: consecutive patients of patent Ductus
arteriosus weighing less than 5 kgs were enrolled for the study.
Sample Collection: data was collected from the hospital records
Inclusion criteria: all the children with PDA weighing less than
5 kgs and echo cardiographically the ductus found to be amenable for device
closure were included in the study.
Exclusion criteria: All the children having complex cardiac
defects having PDA as one of the defect.
Not found suitable for device closure on echocardiography.
Parents not giving consent for the procedure.
Relevant data were
obtained retrospectively from the case files and the catheterization records.
Statistical Methods: Observational study in which the demographic
and angiographic data of children with PDA having less than 5 kgs weight was
presented.
Ethical Consideration: The procedure was done with the informed
consent from the parents.
Patients- All patients were admitted at least 1 day prior to the
procedure for clinical, laboratory (pre-cath profile), chest X-ray, ECG, and echocardiograph
assessment. Upper and lower limb
saturations were recorded in all patients. Echocardiographic evaluation
revealed the size & anatomy of the PDA, and estimation of the pulmonary
artery pressure (PAP). Patients were screened for presence of coarctation of
Aorta and branch pulmonary artery stenosis.
Procedures- Informed consent was obtained from the guardians of patients
prior to the procedure. The procedure was performed under conscious sedation in
all the patients. A single dose of intravenous antibiotic is administered
(usually cefuroxime) The femoral vein only was cannulated per-cutaneously in 11
cases while femoral artery only were cannulated in 4 cases as venous access in
thesecases could not be done while in one case both (Arterial and Venous)
accesses were taken. Right heart catheterization was performed, basal systemic
pressure and basal pulmonary arterial pressure were taken and Qp/Qs and basal
pulmonary arterial resistance were calculated.Aortogram in the lateral
projection and right anterior oblique 30° were recorded using hand injection
through sheath after crossing PDA in DTA was done in 12 cases and with pigtail catheter was done in 4 cases to define
the duct. Diameter at the pulmonary
(Duct size) and aortic ends, and its length were measured.
The PDA was crossed from the pulmonary end in 13 cases while in 3 cases
where only femoral arterial access was taken; it was crossed from arterial side.
Delivery sheath was introduced from the venous side over the Amplatzer super
stiff guide wire (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA), and was kept in the
descending thoracic aorta. In cases where arterial line only was done PDA was
crossed from arterial side through 0.25 inch straight tip terumoand parked deep
in MPA through which guiding JR catheter was placed and device was deployed
through that. The device size used was the one size more as the angiographic size.
Device was delivered as per the standard technique [2-4].Post procedure the patients were monitored
in the intensive cardiac care unit for 24 hrs. A close watch was kept for any
evidence of intravascular hemolysis and device embolization. Patients were
discharged after 48 hours of observation.
All cases were followed at 6 weeks, 3 months, and every six months
thereafter. Improvement in functional class and weight gain was noted. The
patients were evaluated clinically for any evidence of worsening. At follow up
echocardiography, the position of the device was confirmed and residual shunt
if any was noted. The presence of turbulence in the left pulmonary artery (LPA)
and aortic isthmus was looked for and the velocities/gradients across these
structures were recorded.
Results
From March 2018 to January 2019, 16 patients (9 females, 7 males) between
20 days to 16 months of life underwent trans-catheter closure of PDA (ranging
from 2.5 mm to 5.5 mm at PA end) as an alternative to standard surgical
ligationwith use of different devices. Out of these1 patient was less than 1 month,
6 patients were between 1 to 6 months, 8 were between 6 months to 12 months and
only 1 were more than 1 year. In this case series 7 patients had PDA sizes
between 2.5 to 3 mm, 4 had between 3- 4mm, 4 had between 4-4.5 mm and only 1
patient had large PDA more than 4.5 mm at PA end. OnSimultaneous measurements
of PA pressure and Aortic pressure 6 patients showed PA pressure > 2/3rd of
systemic pressure which was reversible on oximetry testing, while other 10
patients had PA pressure between ½ to 2/3rd of systemic pressure with good
reversibility. In all patients there was a significant fall in pulmonary artery
systolic pressure (>20% of baseline) post device occlusion of PDA.
As far as devices are concerned we used
Amplatzer Duct Occluder (ADOI) in
11 cases, Amplatzer duct Occluder (ADOII) in 4
cases and only one PDA was closed with Amplatzer Duct Occluder (ADOIIAS). All the 16patients underwent
successful closure of PDA. There was no incidence of device migration or
embolization. At the time of post deployment angiogram, 7 out of 16 patients
showed residual shunt through the device. However, it disappeared over a period
of time and there was no residual shunt in any of the patients at the time of
the last follow up
Table-1: Demographic data of patients
No |
Sex |
Age (months) |
Weight (Kg) |
Major complications |
Associated cardiac anomaly |
Associated Non cardiac anomaly |
1 |
F |
1 |
2.2 |
None |
None |
None |
2 |
M |
7 |
3.8 |
None |
None |
None |
3 |
F |
3 |
3.0 |
None |
None |
None |
4 |
M |
4 |
2.5 |
None |
None |
None |
5 |
F |
7 |
3.6 |
None |
BL Branch PA stenosis |
Sensory neural hearing defect |
6 |
F |
9 |
3.2 |
None |
None |
None |
7 |
F |
5 |
3.0 |
None |
Small VSD |
None |
8 |
M |
8 |
|
None |
None |
None |
9 |
M |
6 |
3.0 |
None |
None |
None |
10 |
M |
9 |
3.9 |
None |
None |
None |
11 |
F |
16 |
5.0 |
None |
None |
None |
12 |
M |
10 |
4.0 |
None |
None |
None |
13 |
F |
2 |
2.8 |
None |
None |
None |
14 |
F |
11 |
4.8 |
None |
None |
Cleft palate |
15 |
M |
20 days* |
1.6 |
None |
None |
None |
16 |
F |
5 |
2.9 |
None |
None |
None |
*36 weeks Preterm baby
Median age -6.4 months
Median weight- 3.2 kg
Table-2: Angiographic data of patients
No. |
PDA Size ( mm) |
Qp/Qs |
Device size |
Type of device |
Major complications |
Minor complications |
Vascular access |
Closure side |
1 |
2.5 |
1.8 |
6/4 |
ADO I |
None |
None |
Venous |
Venous |
2 |
3.2 |
2.1 |
8/6 |
ADO I |
None |
LPA obstruction |
Venous |
Venous |
3 |
2.8 |
1.6 |
6/4 |
ADO I |
None |
None |
Venous |
Venous |
4 |
4.2 |
1.5 |
8/6 |
ADO I |
None |
None |
Venous |
Venous |
5 |
3.0 |
1.8 |
5/4 |
ADO II |
None |
None |
Arterial |
Arterial |
6 |
3.5 |
2.0 |
6/6 |
ADO II |
None |
None |
Arterial |
Arterial |
7 |
2.6 |
2.1 |
6/4 |
ADO I |
None |
None |
Venous |
Venous |
8 |
4.4 |
2.1 |
5/4 |
ADO II |
None |
None |
Arterial |
Arterial |
9 |
2.6 |
1/8 |
6/4 |
ADO I |
None |
None |
Venous |
Venous |
10 |
4.5 |
1.5 |
10/8 |
ADO I |
None |
Mild aortic obstruction |
Both arterial and venous |
Venous |
11 |
3.5 |
1.6 |
6/6 |
ADO II |
None |
LPA obstruction |
Arterial |
Arterial |
12 |
2.8 |
1.6 |
6/4 |
ADO I |
None |
None |
Venous |
Venous |
13 |
5.2 |
1.8 |
10/8 |
ADO I |
None |
LPA obstruction |
Venous |
Venous |
14 |
3.2 |
2.0 |
8/6 |
ADO I |
None |
None |
Venous |
Venous |
15 |
3.0 |
1.9 |
6/6 |
ADO II AS |
None |
None |
Venous |
Venous |
16 |
4.4 |
2.0 |
8/6 |
ADO I |
None |
None |
Venous |
Venous |
Complications- No mortality noted in this study. Significant hypotension (50% drops in
aortic systolic pressure) along with ST-T changes in inferior leads were noted
in one case. Hemodynamic stability was regained in as soon as stiff wire was
removed after placing the delivery sheath in the descending aorta. Transient
loss of lower limb pulses was observed in 4cases. At the time of pre discharge
echocardiography, two patients had a mild flow acceleration in their LPA with a
maximum velocity of > 2 m/s but < 2.5 m/s while one patient had peak
velocity of > 2 m/s but less than 2.5 m/s in the region of the aortic
isthmus due to the protrusion of aortic retention disc into the aortic lumen
which gradually improved on 6 months follow up.
Discussion
Every patient of 5kg or less with PDA should be evaluated carefully
before attempting device closure of PDA for evidence of significant left to
right shunt utilizing clinical examination, chest X ray, ECG, Echo Doppler and
if necessary, hemodynamic assessment at cardiac catheterization to ensure
satisfactory long-term outcome after device closure [2,3]. Assessment of PVR at
cardiac catheterization after administering 100% oxygen, and after nitric oxide
has several limitations in a patient with PDA especially in very small babies [5, 7].
Transcatheter
closure of PDA has been the mainstay of treatment in children and adults [11]. Fortes
et al presented a retrospective case
series of 1808 patients with transcatheter closure of PDA in a report published
in 2010. Overall PDA closure rate was 94% and major complications were 1.5%
[12]. There have been only a few minor complications compared with the initial
interventional data [13,14]. Nevertheless, procedure-associated complications
have been described in different age groups, and they are relatively major in
infants [7,15,16]. In this study, we evaluated 16 small children who
weighed 5kg or less and underwent percutaneous
transcatheter PDA closure during a period of 12 months, which was the initial
experience of our institution, and found
high success rate ( 100%) without any mortality which shows the safety of transcatheter closure of
PDA in children weighing 5 kg or less. In a previous report by Park et al.
[17], the median age of 115 patients was 8 months and mean body weight was
7.8kg while in our study median age was 6 months and median weight was 3.2 kg.
The success rate was 98%, nearly similar to our results. El-Said et al. [18]
reported a large prospective multicenter study unbiased to patient or device
selection of transcatheter closure of PDA. The study evaluated 290 small
children of 496 patients; the success rate of PDA closure was 97–99%. Also, the
rate of high-severity complications of this study was low (2.2%). Complications
were more likely to occur in young patients (<6 months), and in patients
<6kg. In Dimas et al.’s multicenter study [19], the age of the infants
studied was younger and their weights were lower. Successful device placement
was achieved in 58 of 62 patients (94%).
In
our study, the incidence of device embolization was none. In eleven patients in the current study, the
PDA occluder (ADO I) were implanted using venous access only deliberately to
avoid complications related arterial puncture, although in four cases venous
line could not be done instead we took the arterial line only and the device
(ADOII) was deployed from arterial side safely and in one case both arterial and
venous access was done for better delineation as anatomy and size of PDA in
that particular patient was not clear
on echocardiogram. Based on our
experience we suggest that this method of avoiding arterial line to avoid
certain complications is good and efficient approach.there were no immediate or
delayed major complications in our study such as protrusion of the occlusion
device into the aorta or obstruction to the left pulmonary artery, hemolysis,
or endocarditis. We have not used any coil in our study due to bigger size of
PDA for coil occlusion. We used
Amplatzer Duct Occluder (ADOI) in
11 cases, Amplatzer duct Occluder (ADOII) in 4
cases and only one PDA was
closed with Amplatzer Duct Occluder
(ADOIIAS) . The results
documented in our series are in accordance with theresults reported by other
interventional paediatric cardiac centres [6,17–19,22].
Study limitations- Limitations of the present study include its
retrospective nature and the relatively small number of patients. More studies
with a larger number of patients and younger patients are needed to analyze the
safety and efficacy of transcatheter closure of PDA in this age group.
Conclusions
Although surgical repair of large PDA is a safe, widely accepted
procedure with negligible mortality, it is associated with morbidity,
discomfort and a thoracotomy scar. As an alternative to surgery trans-catheter
closure of PDA with different devices is a good option with better results.
With the current availability of devices for PDA closure, transcatheter closure
of PDA is considered safe and efficacious in small children weighing 5kg or
less with good mid-term outcome. The procedure had a low rate of complications
even with the initial experience of a catheterization laboratory.
Authors Contribution- Dr MMK and SA collected the data, SA, MMK and
AH prepared the manuscript, Dr SA and Dr SG did the statistical analysis and
MMK and FMI reviewed the manuscript.
What this study
adds to existing knowledge? PDA device closure even in younger and less weight infants is a safer
alternative to surgical ligation
References