Incidence,
risk factors, clinical profile, and determinants (affecting outcome) of
new onset acute kidney injury developing in critically
Illpatients in pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital in
middle India
Rao B.N.1, Rathia S.K.2,
Phuljhele S.3, Verma Y.K.4, Amle D.5
1Dr. Badri Narayan Rao, Associate Professor, 2Dr.
Santosh Kumar Rathia, Assistant Professor, 3Dr. Sharja Phuljhele, Professor
& HOD, 4Dr. Yogendra Kumar Verma, PG Student; above all authors
are affiliated to Pt. J.N.M. Medical College, Raipur, Chhattisgarh from the
Department of Pediatrics, 5Dr.
Dnyanesh Amle, previously Assistant Professor in Biochemistry at the same
institute, now at AIIMS, Nagpur, India.
Corresponding Author: Dr. Santosh Kumar Rathia, MIG (Deluxe)-217,
Phase-2, Kabirnagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India. E-mail: drsantoshrathia84@gmail.com
Abstract
Aim/Objectives: To study the incidence, clinical-profile of AKI developing in
critically-ill children after admission to PICU, including its risk-factors and
determinants affecting patient outcome. Material/Methods:
This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary teaching
hospital (Pt JNM Medical College Raipur, CG, India) over a study period of 12
months (August 2017-July 2018). Those patients who satisfied the
inclusion-criteria of having critical-illness requiring PICU admission, age
between 1month to 18 years,anddevelopingin-hospital AKI were enrolled; and
after obtaining written informed-consent from parents, their basic demographic,
clinical details and laboratory reports were entered from case records into
predesigned proforma and then data was compiled in Microsoft Excel-Sheet. AKI
staging was obtained using pRIFLE criteria (2007) and compared with
renal-recovery and patient-survival. SPSS software (version 21) was used for
data-analysis and p-value <0.05 was taken for statistical significance. Results: Out of total 1042 critically-ill
children admitted during study-period, 103 developed new-onset AKI in PICU
(overall incidence 9.8%). Among them, 96 patients died (93.2%cases). Maximum
subjects developing in-hospital AKI had three major associated fatal
risk-factors like refractory shock (80.5%), severe sepsis (68%) and MODS
(62.1%). But only MODS (p=0.002) and refractory-shock (p=0.0001) showed
significant association with fatal outcome. Maximum new-onset AKI cases
developed within 3 days of PICU admission (62%). No statistically-significant
association was observed between different AKI-stages and renal-recovery or
patient-survival.Conclusion: Sepsis
was common underlying risk-factor for new-onset AKI in critically-ill patients
admitted in PICU, while association of MODS and/or refractory shock majorly determined
poor survival-outcome.
Keywords: New-onset AKI, Incidence, Risk-factors,
p-RIFLE, Outcome, Determinants
Author Corrected: 27th May 2019 Accepted for Publication: 31st May 2019
Introduction
Acute kidney injury
(AKI) or acute renal failure (ARF), is usually defined as an abrupt decline in
renal function, presenting clinically as a reversible acute increase in
nitrogenous wastes (blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels) over the
course of few hours to weeks.
There is trend of
significantly higher incidence of AKI amongst critically ill patients of ICUs
compared to all patients admitted to any hospital. Recent two studies have
reported overall incidence of new-onset AKI in critically sick PICU subjects to
be 36% & 25%, while it was only 9% & 5.2% respectively in non critical pediatric
admissions [1, 2].
In the critically ill patients (both in adults and
children), sepsis is the major cause or risk-factor for AKI, accounting for
nearly 50% of cases. Sepsis, shock and/or MODS are major determinants of poor
outcome as well, as shown by various observational studies [1,3].Mortality
rates in critically ill paediatric patients
developing AKI are usually high, ranging
between 9% and 67%. [4,5]. Acute renal insult’ is currently
defined/categorized based on severity of renal compromise based on RIFLE[6] or
more specifically ‘pRIFLE criteria’[7] for pediatric patients. Such severity
staging of AKI also determines the chance of renal-recovery as well as patient
survival outcome.
This study had been
planned to assess the actual burden of new-onset AKI amongst critically-sick
pediatric patients in a tertiary care PICU in middle India and evaluate the
triggering risk-factors as well as determinants of overall survival outcome.
Such informative data from studies on various settings across the county can
help minimizing/preventing AKI incidence and guide to early treatment
strategies for better patient outcome.
Material
&Methods
Type of Study: Hospital based prospective observational
study.
Study Setting: Pt JNM Medical College, Raipur & Dr BR
Ambedkar Memorial Hospital, CG, India.
Study Period: Data collection was done over 12 months
(August 2017-July 2018).
Study Population: Inclusion Criteria: Age between 1month to 18 years, patients
having critical-illness requiring PICU admission, and developingin-hospital AKI
(with normal RFT at admission);
Exclusion Criteria: Age<1monts or >18yrs, non-critical
patients, pre-existing AKI or CKD, baseline serum creatinine not availableat
admission (or within 24 hours), refusal for consent.
Criteria set for critical illness of patients
in this study: Admission
to PICU with any one or more of the following: (i) required
mechanical ventilation (ii) required vasopressor support for shock (dopa/dobuta-mine>10mcg/kg/min
or adrenaline any dose) (iii) impaired level of consciousness (GCS<7)
(iv)acute/fulminant hepatic failure (v) uncontrolled or poorly controlled
seizures/ status epilepticus.
Study Methodology & Data Collection: After obtaining permission & approval
from institutional ethics committee, and written informed-consent was obtained
from parents, basic demographic, clinical details and laboratory reports of all
enrolled patients were entered from case records into predesigned proforma and
then data was compiled in Microsoft Excel-Sheet.
Outcome Variables/Measures: Each subject was followed until final outcome (either survived &
discharged from PICU or death) and last serum creatinine report of each patient
was recorded to assess the renal recovery till then, so as to compare
renal-function improvement from different AKI stages and with various
co-morbidities/risk factors.
Primary Outcome-AKI incidence in critically sick children
over study period, AKI-staging, renal-recovery, survival or all cause mortality
Secondary Outcome- Associated risk factors or underlying
co-morbidities, determinants of outcome (demographic and disease profile)
Investigations/reports obtained to define
outcome measures: (i) Urine output monitoring: input-output chart from PICU patients’
records (for clinical AKI detection) (ii)Renal function test: serum creatinine
and urea {for baseline Cr and Cr Clearance rate at admission, at the first
clinical detection of AKI for pRIFLE staging, and, at discharge or final
outcome(death/LAMA) of patient}(iii) ABG and serum electrolytes (K+/Na+/Ca++):
for dialysis indications (iv) Complete blood count- for anemia/thrombocytopenic
and infection evidence (v)Infectious screening- CRP, blood C/S, urine R/M,
urine &other cultures, card test & PS for Malaria, CXR, USG, CT, other
specific tests (vi) For co-morbid factors affecting patient outcome-LFT, RBS,
PT/INR, CBC/Platelet, ECG, CXR, lactate by ABG/VBG etc. for
MODS/DIC/ARDS/refractory shock /cardiogenic shock/Arrhythmia; C3/
ANA / ds DNA/ASO titres etc. for certain specific etiology of AKI or related
problems.
pRIFLE staging/Classification[7]:AKI staging was obtained using pRIFLE-criteria(2007)
which is pediatric modification of RIFLE criteria(2004) developed by Acute
Dialysis QualityInitiative (ADQI) Group and preferred over alternative
AKIN(2004) staging.
Stage
|
Serum Creatinine/clearance
criteria
|
Urine output criteria
|
Risk
|
eClCr decrease by 25%
|
< 0.5 ml/kg/h for 8 hours
|
Injury
|
eClCr decrease by 50%
|
< 0.5 ml/kg/h for 16 hours
|
Failure
|
eClCr decrease by
75% OR eClCr< 35
ml/min. per 1.73 m2
|
< 0.3 ml/kg/h
for 24 hours OR anuric for 12 hours
|
In
pRIFLE staging being creatinine-based AKI criteria, serum creatinine values are
used to calculate an estimated creatinine clearance (eCCl or eClCr) by the
Schwartz formula:
eCCl (ml/min/1.73m2) = k x patient’s height (cm)/serum creatinine
(mg/dl),
where, k is a constant based on patient's gender and age: 'k values’ for
preterms or low birth weight less than 1 year (0.33), for full term less than 1
year (0.45); for 2-12 years of age (0.55), and, while it is (0.55) for 13-21
year old females; 13-21 year old males need higher multiplication factor
(0.70).
·
Baseline and current serum
creatinine values are used to calculate a change in eCCl.
o
If no baseline serum
creatinine is available for 3 months prior to current value, assume normal eCCl
= 120 ml/min/1.73m2 for new onset AKI cases.
Statistical Analysis
·
All relevant data were entered into predesigned proforma and analysed
(with help of statistician) using Microsoft SPSS software for windows TM
Version 21, IBM TM Corp NY and Microsoft excel TM 2007, Microsoft
Inc USA.
·
Data was expressed as percentage and mean +/_ SD
·
Student’s t test was used to check the significance of difference
between two parameters in parametric data.
·
Pearson correlation analysis was performed to check the correlation
between two categorical variables.
·
Fischer’s exact test or Chi square test was used to analyse the
significance of difference between distributions of the data.
·
P value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Results:
Incidence of new- onset AKI in the study setting: In this hospital based observational study
conducted over one-year period, total 1570 patients were admitted in Pediatric
intensive care unit (PICU). Those patients who fulfilled the assumed criteria
for critical illness (as well as having higher risk of developing AKI) were
1042, but we could finally recruit only 103 of them as study-subjects who
actually developed new-onset AKI.
Out total 103 subjects having AKI developed
in hospital, 58 subjects were male and 45 subjects were female.We grouped total
1042 PICU patients into 4 major age-groups: 1 month - 1 year (43.9%), 1 - 6 years
(13.7%), 6-12 years (27%), and 12-18 years(15.4%), since clinico-etiological
profile or risk-factors of AKI and underlying-disease pattern vary in different
age groups.Amongst these critically sickpediatric patients having risk for
developing new-onset AKI, females were more than male(58% vs 42%).
But, AKI diagnosed
in target population was considered to have ‘new-onset’ only when it developed
in- hospital (without pre-existing AKI or CKD), our actual study
population-size contracted to include 103 subjects with more male than female
(n=58 vs 45) and even there was no significant difference on fractional
contribution -26.2%, 21.4%, 26.2% & 25.2% by four different age groups
respectively (thus reducing age-bias in thisstudy subjects especially with
regard to renal and patient survival outcome).
Incidence of new-onset AKI in our study
setting
Incidence Rate = Number of new cases/ Sum of person-time at risk
= 103 / 1042 x 1(year)
= 0.098 or (9.8 %)
Thus, the overall
annual incidence of AKI in critically sick PICU-patients was 9.8% in our study
setting.
Table-1: Incidence of new onset AKI over one year study period with
age-group & sex wise distribution
Age Groups |
Incidence Among Malesin % (N=436) |
Incidence Among Females in % (N=606) |
Age-WiseIncidencerate (in % over a year) |
1 Month -1 Year (N=457) |
9.9 |
2.7 |
5.9 |
1– 6 Years (N=143) |
16.9 |
15.2 |
16.0 |
6 - 12 Years (N=282) |
12.7 |
7.5 |
9.5 |
12 - 18 Years (N=160) |
22.6 |
13 |
16.2 |
Average Incidence |
13.3 |
7.4 |
9.8 % |
Highest incidence of acute/ new onset kidney
injury (>16%) was in adolescent age group 12-18 years and 1-6years
preschoolers (16%) compared to infants of <1yr age-group(<6%), despite of
the maximum sick patient burden to the PICU was from this youngest age-group.
Similarly, opposite to more admissions of females with critical illnesses,
males developed more AKI (13.3% vs 7.4%).
System- wise underlying disease profile among
study subjects: As
shown in table 2, maximum new-onset AKI cases were seen with primary disease of
central nervous system (n=27,30%) followed by cardiovascular system (n=16, 15.5%
) and respiratory system ( n=15,14.5%). Other causes were primary infection
(n=10,9.7%), blood disorder (n=8,7.7%), hepato-biliary system (n=7,6.7%),
malignancy (n=5,4.8%), renal system (n=3,2.9%), endocrine disorder (n=3, 2.9%),
poisoning / snake bite ( n=4,3.8%) and others (n=5,4.8%). CNS system (26.2%)
was most commonly primarily involved in approximately all age groups which
further involved to multiple systems and multiple organ damage. Renal diseases
itself caused less AKI (2.9%) as compared to other systemic involvement.
Table-2: Age group wise distribution of different major systems affected
with AKI cases
Primary System Involved |
1 Month – 1 Year |
1 Year-6 Years |
6 Years-12 Years |
12 Years-18 Years |
Total Number |
Total Percentage |
Central Nervous System |
7 |
7 |
8 |
5 |
27 |
26.2 |
Cardio Vascular System |
11 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
16 |
15.5 |
Respiratory System |
5 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
15 |
14.5 |
Primary Infection |
3 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
10 |
9.7 |
Hematological Disorders |
0 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
8 |
7.7 |
Hepato Biliary System |
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
6.7 |
Malignancy |
0 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
4.8 |
Renal System |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
2.9 |
Endocrine Disorder |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
2.9 |
Poisoning / Snake Bite |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
3.8 |
Others |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
4.8 |
Total |
28 |
23 |
28 |
24 |
103 |
100 |
Associated risk
factors for new-onset AKI among study subjects: Maximum study subjects who developed new
onset AKI were associated with risk factors refractory shock (n=90,87.4%)
followed by sepsis (n=70,68%) and MODS (n=67,65%). Primarily renal cause itself
leads to very less number of AKI cases (approx 9.6%) as depicted in table 3.
Table-3: Associated or co morbid risk factors leading to new onset AKI
Risk Factors |
1 Month-1 Year (N=27) |
1 Year -6 Years (N=23) |
6 Years-12 Years (N=27) |
12 Years- 18 Years (N=26) |
Refractory Shock |
22 (81.5%) |
20 (87%) |
25 (92.6%) |
22 (84.6%) |
Sepsis / Pneumonia |
23 (85.1%) |
16 (69.5%) |
17 (62.9%) |
14 (53.8%) |
MODS |
15 (5.5%) |
15 (65.2%) |
19 (70.3%) |
18 (69.2%) |
Severe Anaemia |
3 (1.1%) |
10 (43.4%) |
10 (37%) |
3 (11.5%) |
CCF |
8 (29.6%) |
3 (13%) |
8 (29.6%) |
5 (19.2%) |
Status Epilepticus |
5 (18.5%) |
6 (26%) |
3 (11.1%) |
5 (19.2%) |
AGE / DVD (Dehydration) |
4 (14.8%) |
4 (17.3%) |
2 (7.4%) |
1 (3.9%) |
HIE Sequelae |
1 (3.7%) |
4 (17.3%) |
3 (11.1%) |
0 (0%0 |
Nephrotic Syndrome / PEM |
0 (0%) |
2 (8.6%) |
1 (3.7%) |
2 (7.6%) |
Renal / Other Malignancy |
0 (0%) |
2 (8.7%) |
2 (7.4%) |
1 (3.9%) |
AGN/PIGN/HUS/SLE |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (3.7%) |
0 (0%) |
Tumor Lysis Syndrome |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (3.7%) |
0 (0%) |
Other associated risk factors were severe
anaemia (25.2 %), CCF (23.2 %), status epilepticus (18.4 %), AGE related
dehydration (10.6 %), HIE sequelae (7.7 %), nephrotic syndrome (4.8 %).
Bacteriological Culture Profile amongst
Septic Subjects: Most common organisms grown on culture-proven sepsis (60% of critical
patients with AKI in our PICU) were- klebsiella (38%), CONS (28%), pseudomonas (15%),
enterococcus(6.5%), Acinetobacter (5%), Citrobacter (3.3%); while staphaureus (3.3%)
and streptococcus pyogenes(1.7%). Overall Gram +ve organisms contributed less
(about 40%) compared to usually nosocomial/ hospital-acquired Gram-ve organisms
60%). Around 2/3rd cases of klebsiella positive sepsis was found in
young infants aged <2yrs.
Major Outcome Variables (with respect to
chance of renal-recovery and patient-survival):
AKI Staging In Our Study Subjects: In all age groups, injury and failure was the
most common pRIFLE stages at which patients were first time recognized as AKI.
As most of worsening patients died at ‘failure’ stage, thus ‘loss and ESRD’
stages could not be observed except in single patient who survived with
prolonged AKI >4wks and ultimately died of MODS.
Table-4: AKI stages on first recognition in different age groups
Age Groups |
Risk |
Injury |
Failure |
1 Month-1 Year |
2 (1.9 % ) |
13 (12.6 % ) |
9 (8.7 %) |
1 Year-6 Years |
4 ( 3.8 % ) |
9( 8.7 % ) |
11 ( 10.6 % ) |
6 Years-12 Years |
3 ( 2.9 % ) |
13 (12.6%) |
11 ( 10.6 % ) |
12 Years-18 Years |
3 ( 2.9 % ) |
11 (10.6 % ) |
13 ( 12.6 % ) |
Total |
12 (11.8%) |
46 (10.8%) |
44 (43.1%) |
According to pRIFLE staging, maximum AKI
cases were firstly detectedin this study, when they had reached to ‘injury’
stage (44.6 %) and ‘failure’ stage (42.7 %). Early detected at ‘risk’ stage the
numbers were small (only 11.6 %).
Rapidity or duration to develop in-hospital
AKI: Maximum
AKI developed within 3 days (61.1%) of hospital stay followed by 4-7 days (29.1
%). AKI developed earlier in younger age groups.
Dialysis Requirement: 29 out of total 103 study subjects (28%) were
indicated for dialysis/hemodialysis. But dialysis could not be done in most of
subjects due to low GCS, hemodynamic instability and poor resources in the
study-setting.
Overall patient survival outcome: 90 patients (87.4%) died due to complications
of worsening AKI or coexisting MODS/refractory shock. Another three more
patients (2.9%) partially improved to better AKI stage and but died due to
other co morbid condition.
Determinant factors affecting patient
outcome:
i. AKI stage at firstrecognition(see table 5)
Table-5: Association between AKI -stages and patient outcome
AKI
stage (at first detection) |
Final patient-outcome |
|
|
Discharge |
Death |
Total |
|
Risk |
3 |
9 |
12 |
37.5% |
9.5% |
11.7% |
|
Injury |
1 |
45 |
46 |
12.5% |
47.3% |
44.7% |
|
Failure |
4 |
40 |
44 |
50% |
42.1% |
42.7% |
|
LOSS |
0 |
1 |
1 |
Association between
AKI staging and recovery was performed using Chi square test. No significant
association was detected between these two parameters.
ii. Other multiple factors determining the
final patient outcome: various factors could have affected the disease course and were related
to high all- cause mortality (see table 6) –
Table-6: Determinant factors for fatal outcome in different age groups
Determinant Factors (other than AKI stage) |
1 Month-1 Year (N=25) |
1 -6 Years (N=21) |
6 -12 Years (N=24) |
12 -18 Years (N=25) |
Refractory Shock |
96%) |
20 (95.2%) |
22 (91.6%) |
24 (96%) |
Sepsis |
%) |
16 (76.2%) |
12 (50%) |
17 (68%) |
MODS |
(72%) |
14 (66.6%) |
17 (70.8%) |
18 (72%) |
Severe Anaemia |
|
8 (38%) |
9 (37.5%) |
5 (20%) |
ARDS |
(4%) |
2 (9.5%) |
2 (8.3%) |
3 (12%) |
AGE With Severe Dehydration |
|
3 (14.3%) |
2 (8.3%) |
0 (0%) |
Malignancy (ATLS
) |
(0%) |
1 (4.8%) |
2 (8.3) |
2 (8%) |
AGN Or Nephritic
Related Hypertensive Emergency |
|
0 (0%) |
1 (4.2%) |
2 (8%) |
Severe Hypoproteinemia |
(0%) |
2 (9.5%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
Refractory shock (n=90,94.7%) followed by
sepsis (n=69,72.6%) and MODS (n=67,70.5%) were major factors to determine fatal
outcome in newly onset AKI cases.Other determinant factors for fatal outcome
were severe anaemia (n=25,26.3 %), ARDS (n=8,8.4 %), AGE with severe
dehydration (n=7,7.4 %), malignancy (ATLS)(n=5,n=5.2)and severe hypoproteinemia
(n=2,2.1%).
Renal Recovery (AKI Reversal) and its
determinants in this study: Only 6 (5.8 %) patients out of total 103 patients with new onset AKI
completely improved with their serum creatinine improved to near baseline and
were successfully discharged; while 7 (6.8 %) patients were shifted to the ward
from PICU with partial renal recovery. Majority of subjects (n=90, 87.4%)
showed worsening renal function results over their hospital stay period.
Table-7: Association between determinant factors and AKI recovery status
Determinant factors |
AKI Recovery (renal status) |
Total |
|
|
|
Improved |
Worsened |
P Value |
|
Sepsis |
9 |
66 |
75 |
0.493 |
69.2% |
73.3% |
72.8% |
|
|
MODS |
4 |
64 |
68 |
0.006 |
30.8% |
71.1% |
66.0% |
||
Refractory shock |
3 |
88 |
91 |
<0.0001 |
23.1% |
97.8% |
88.3% |
||
ARDS |
1 |
8 |
9 |
0.683 |
7.7% |
8.9% |
8.7% |
||
Severe anemia |
3 |
24 |
27 |
0.541 |
23.1% |
26.7% |
26.2% |
||
Severe hypo-proteinemia |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0.762 |
.0% |
2.2% |
1.9% |
|
|
AGE with severe dehydration |
3 |
5 |
8 |
0.061 |
23.1% |
5.6% |
7.8% |
||
Nephrotoxic changes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
|
||
Malignancy |
0 |
5 |
5 |
.502 |
.0% |
5.6% |
4.9% |
||
AGN/Nephritic |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0.762 |
.0% |
2.2% |
1.9% |
||
Total |
13 |
90 |
103 |
|
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
|
Association between determinant factors and
AKI recovery was performed using Fischer’s exact test. MODS (p=0.006) and
refractory shock (p=0.0001) were the only factors showing significant
association with worsened AKI recovery.
Discussion
The overall annual
incidence of new-onset AKI amongst 1042 critically-ill children admitted to
PICU of Pt JNM Medical college, Raipur, CG during the study period was 9.8%
(n=103). A similar observational study by Mehta P et al[1] reported overall
incidence of new-onset AKI in critically sick PICU subjects to be 36.1%, while
it was only 9% in non-critically ill pediatric subjects. As observed by another
study of Krishnamurthy S, et al[2], the incidence of AKI was 5.2% amongst all
pediatric patients admitted to wards (including PICU), while it was as high as
25.1% among isolated PICU admissions.
Most number of
cases of AKI developed in young infants in our study, but adolescents also
contributed comparable number of cases amongst our subjects (around 25% from
each age-group) and rather high age-wise incidence among adolescents (16.2%
versus 5.9%). Weljad Al Jbur, et alobserved most significant risk factors of
AKI in critically ill children were the younger age group 1 month to 1 year
(42.2%) [3].
The
clinico-etiological profile of study subjects by affected primary system,
majority of cases were having CNS diseases (30.6%) followed by CVS (16%) and
respiratory diseases (16.4%), while isolated renal system disease was least
common (3%). Although system-wise, we obtained systemic infections
(multisystem-sepsis) at fourth position, but actually overall infection
with/without culture proven septicemia contributed to most common cause of
critical illness and AKI in PICU.
By primary
disease-diagnosis at admission, most common diagnoses were sepsis/ pneumonia
(with or without failure to thrive), dyselectrolytemia (with/without underlying
acute gastroenteritis), pyogenic meningitis, CHDs (with/without CCF), severe
malaria, sickle cell crises, AES(acute viral encephalitis/syndrome); while
primary renal cases were few(3%).
In young infants
(<1 year age), CVS (10.6 %) was primarily involved system (with majority
having CHDs), followed by CNS (6.7%), respiratory diseases (5%) excluding
systemic sepsis (3%). Severe malaria constituted about 10 % of all AKI cases in
this observational study.Older children and adolescents presented with acquired
infectious as well as non-infectious diseases like hematological-disorders
(sickling/thalessemia-8.7%, malignancy-4.8%), poisoning/snakebite (total 4%)
and DKA (3%) causing multi-system damages.
Maximum patients
developing any stage of AKI were associated with three commonest risk-factors
e.g. refractory shock (87.4% cases) followed by sepsis (68%) and MODS (65%
cases). Poonam Mehta, et al [1],
conducted a similar study and considered most common etiology of AKI to be
acute tubular necrosis (ATN) which was associated with sepsis and shock as the
chief predisposing conditions. Similarly, sepsis (45.35%) and MODS
(40.6%) were the most significant risk factors of AKI in critically ill
children in a study by Weljad Al Jbur, et al [3].
Sepsis in our study
was in the form of pneumonia, septicemia, meningitis/meningo-encephalitis and
few had clinical sepsis without obvious focus.Most common organisms grown
amongst 60% culture-proven septic and critical patients with AKI in the study
setting were- klebsiella(38%), CONS (28%), pseudomonas (15%), enterococcus (6.5%),
acinetobacter (5%), citrobacter (3.3%); while staph. Aureus (3.3%) and
streptococcus pyogenes (1.7%). Thus overall Gram +ve organisms contributed less
(40% cases) compared to usually occurring nosocomial/hospital-acquired Gram -ve
organisms (60%). Around 2/3rd cases of Klebsiella positive sepsis
was found in young infants aged <2yrs. A similar study done by Singh Naz, et
al(1994)[8] also supported that the most common organisms isolated from
critically ill children were Gram negative bacteria (53%), Gram positive
bacteria (27%), and fungi (9%). Another study by Akash Deep, et al (2002)[9] in
a south Indian PICU showed that Klebsiella(33.3%) was the most common pathogen
followed by E.coli (16.7%) to cause nosocomial PICU infection.
Maximum new-onset
AKI developed within 3 days of hospital or PICU stay, as seen in 62% of our
enrolled subjects. The
staging of new–onset AKI by pRIFLE criteria [7] revealed that most common stage
during case-detection were having ‘injury’/stage-I (44.6%) and
‘failure’/stage-F (42.7%) and least patient survived till or could be observed
till developing stage 4 criteria of ‘renal loss’.
In our study, 28%
of all AKI cases had indications for hemodialysis or RRT, although none could
receive dialysis therapy due to certain technical and resource constraints
(especially lack of pediatric dialysis unit and inadequate provisions even for
timely needed acute peritoneal dialysis).
Similar to our
study setting with RRT facility-limitations, a study by Touza Po P, et alalso
concluded that RRT was required in large proportion (60.1%) of cases, although
that could not be performed due to very low GCS and hemodynamic status of
patients and poor resource [10]. In another study by Bagshaw S M, et al reasons
given by them for not starting RRT (not mutually exclusive) were limitations of
support, adequate urine output, andplan to observe. Mortality was higher in
those not receiving RRT due to limitations [11].
In our study,
overall patient-outcome analysis revealed high mortality after new-onset AKI in
patients already critically sick at admission and it figured upto 92%. Although
most of deaths (87 % mortality) were related to or associated with worsening
renal function or non-recovery AKI, around 5% patient had shown partial
improvement to better AKI stage but died due to other co-morbid conditions
related to their critical illness.
Among determinants
of overall poor AKI-reversal and patient-survival outcome in our setting, major
factors were sepsis (72.6%), refractory shock (94.7%), MODS (70.5%), and
unavailability of adequate and timely renal replacement therapy. In a similar
study by Yegenage T, et al (2010)[12], Sepsis was thecommon cause of acute
renal failure in intensive care units (ICU) with mortality rates as high as
60%.
Both fatal outcome
and worsening AKI stage (or non-recovery from ARF) showed significant
association with each of major outcome determinants - MODS (p<0.05) and
refractory shock (p<0.05) respectively.
Although there were
maximum deaths with RIFLE stage 2(Injury-47%) and stage3 (Failure-42%)
accounting for >89% together, no statistically significant association was
detected between different AKI staging (by pRIFLE criteria) and AKI
recovery/reversal (Pearson Chi-square, p value=0.117) same as betweenAKI stages
and patient-survival outcome (p value= 0.067).
Further progression
of AKI stages to ‘Loss’-stage 4 or prolonged AKI (>4 weeks)was documented in
numerically single (1%) patient of 103 critically ill study subjects, as most
patients died in AKI stage 2 or 3. This would have nullified p-value
significance of possible poor outcome trends with progressive AKI stages.
Conclusion
Significant
proportion (approximately 10%) of critically ill patients admitted to PICU
developed new-onset AKI. Pre-school and adolescent age-group are equally
vulnerable to develop AKI during critical illness having any primary disease
diagnosis at admission. Major co-morbid risk factors for developing AKI and
determinants of AKI-worsening (or poor recovery) as well as poor
patient-survival outcome in this study were sepsis, refractory shock and MODS.
Most patient with AKI stage 2 (injury) and stage 3 (failure) or stage 4 (loss)
had high mortality.
What this study adds to existing knowledge:Timely
detection of AKI in early stages using pRIFLE or RIFLE criteria amongst all
critically ill pediatric patients may help to reduce disease worsening and
fatal outcome with timely reno-protective interventions including dialysis/RRT
(if needed) along with appropriate management of underlying and co-morbid fatal
condition.
Contributions: BNR, SKR and SP conceptualized, designed and
analyzed the study. SKR was directly involved in paper writing drafting and
will be primary correspondent author. YKV conducted data-collection and helped
in analysis and manuscript writing. DA helped in statistical analysis.
Conflict of interest: None
Funding: None
References