Interpretation of low birth weight babies by anthropometric measurements in South India

  • Dr. Raghavendra Doddamani Department of Pediatrics, JJMMC, Davangere.
  • Dr. Jyothi S.D Department of Pediatrics, Belgaum Institute of Medical Sciences, Belgaum
  • Dr. TejaswiVittalPujar Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SSIMSRC, Davangere, Karnataka, India.
Keywords: Anthropometric measurements, Correlation, Low birth weight, Thigh circumference

Abstract

Introduction: Low birth weight is seen most commonly in developing countries. In India majority of births are conducted at home by the Traditional Birth Attendants (TBA) or relatives, where the estimation of birth weight is not done because of lack of weighing machines. Therefore, an early identification and prompt referral of LBW newborns is vital in preventing neonatal deaths.

Objective: To determine the magnitude of low birth weight babies and to correlate birth weight and other anthropometric measurements.

Methodology: This is a cross sectional study done at Christian fellowship hospital,Oddanchatram, Dindigal, Tamilnadu from 1st Dec 2011 to 31st Nov 2012. 500 newborns were examined within 24 hours of their birth in this hospital during this period. Antenatal history and anthropometric measurements were recorded.

Results: The male newborn (57.2%) were more than of female (42.8%). The magnitude of the low birth weight was 262 (52.4%). It was observed that correlation coefficients of all the parameters are positive and are statistically significant (p < 0.001). Maximum and minimum positive correlation was observed in case of thigh circumference (r = 0.776) and Foot length (r = 0.460) respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Global Nutrition Targets 2025 Low BW Policy Brief. World Health Organisation. Available from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/149020/WHO_NMH_NHD_14.5_eng.pdf?sequence=2
2. Low birthweight, country, regional and global estimates, WHO and UNICEF. Available from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43184/9280638327.pdf;jsessionid=35448F11B355C7956A1111CAAB4F8CC4?sequence=1
3. Office of the Registrar General. Sample Registration System Statistical Report 2011. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India; 2013 Sep. Available at: http://censusindia.gov.in /vitalstatistics/SRS_Bulletins/SRS_Bulletins
4. SRS Bulletin, Sample registration system registrar general, India. Volume 51 No.1, September, 2017. Available from http://censusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/SRS_Bulletins/SRS%20Bulletin%20-Sep_2017-Rate-2016.pdf
5. Ballard JL, Khoury JC, Wedig K, et al. New Ballard Score, expanded to include extremely premature infants. J Pediatr. 1991 Sep;119(3):417-23.[pubmed]
6. Use of a simple anthropometric measurement to predict birth weight. WHO Collaborative Study of Birth Weight Surrogates. Bull World Health Organ. 1993;71(2):157-63.[pubmed]
7. Huque F and Hussain ZAM. Detection of low birth weight newborn babies by anthropometric measurements in Bangladesh. Indian Journal of Paediatrics 1991;58(2):223-31.
8. Alves JGB, Lima GM, AzeVedo GN, Cabral VB, Moggi RS, Nunes R. Evaluation of newborn arm circumference as an indicator of low birth weight. Bulletin of Pan American Health Organisation 1991;25(3):207-9.
9. Hossain MM, Habib M, DuPont HL. Association between birth weight and birth arm circumference of neonates in rural Egypt. Indian J Pediatr. 1994 Jan-Feb;61(1):81-7.[pubmed]
10. Sreeramareddy CT, Chuni N, Patil R, et al. Anthropometric surrogates to identify low birth weight Nepalese newborns: a hospital-basedstudy. DOI:10.1186/1471-2431-8-16.[pubmed]
11. Dhar B ,Mowlah G, Nahar S, Islam N. Birth-weight status of newborns and its relationship with other anthropometric parameters in apublic maternity hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh. J Health PopulNutr. 2002 Mar;20(1):36-41.[pubmed]
12. Suneetha B, Kavitha VK. A Study of Relationship between Birthweight and Various Anthropometric Parameters in Neonates. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2011Vol.3, No.12, 752-756.
13. Das JC, Khanam ST. Correlation of anthropometric measurements of mothers and their newborns. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 1997 Apr;23(1):10-5. [pubmed]
14.Sharma JN, Saxena S, Sharma U. Thigh circumference at birth as the best predictor of low birth weight babies. Indian Pediatr. 1989 Jan;26(1):18-21.[pubmed]
15. Ahmed M, Colaco SM, Ali MA, Ahmed Z. Birth Weight Status of Newborn and Its Relationship With Other Anthropometric Parameters. Int J Med Health Sci. Jan 2014,Vol-3;Issue-1, p 1-6
16. Ramji S, Marwah J, Satyanarayana L, et al. Neonatal thigh circumference as an alternative indicator of low birth weight. Indian J Med Res. 1986 Jun;83:653-4.[pubmed]
17. Oo WM, Moe H. Predictive Model of Birth Weight Using Simple Anthropometric Measurements of Baby and Selected Maternal Characteristics. The Myanmar Health Sciences Research Journal, 2015, Vol 27, No 1, p 1-9
18. Neela J, Raman L, Balakrishna N, Rao KV. Usefulness of calf circumference as a measure for screening low birth weight infants. Indian Pediatr. 1991 Aug;28(8):881-4.[pubmed]
19.Samal GC, Swain AK. Calf circumference as an alternative to birth weight for identification of low birth weight babies. Indian Pediatr. 2001 Mar;38(3):275-7.[pubmed]
20. Das JC, Afroze A, Khanam ST, Paul N. Mid-arm circumference: an alternative measure for screening low birth weight babies. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2005 Apr;31(1):1-6.[pubmed]
21. Ahmed FU, Karim E, Bhuiyan SN. Mid-arm circumference at birth as predictor of low birth weight and neonatal mortality. J Biosoc Sci. 2000 Oct;32(4):487-93.[pubmed]
22. Bhargava SK, Ramji S, Kumar A, et al. Mid-arm and chest circumferences at birth as predictors of low birth weight and neonatal mortality in the community. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Dec 7;291(6509):1617-9.[pubmed]
23. Rajesh N, Kiran P. Identification of an anthropometric surrogate to low birth weight in newborns: a hospital based cross sectional study. Int J Community Med Public Health 2018;5:2066-71
24. Samal GC, Swain AK. Calf circumference as an alternative to birth weight for identification of low birth weight babies. Indian Pediatr. 2001 Mar;38(3):275-7.[pubmed]
25. Amar MT, Rewat M, Amol L. Neonatal Foot Length: An Alternative Predictor of Low Birth Weight Babies in Rural India. Acad J Ped Neonatol. 2016;1(4):555569
26. Gowri S, Kumar GV. Clinical study of the correlation of foot length and birth weight among newborns in a tertiary care hospital. Int J ContempPediatr2017;4:979-83.
Interpretation of low birth weight babies by anthropometric measurements in South India
CITATION
DOI: 10.17511/ijpr.2018.i07.05
Published: 2018-07-31
How to Cite
Dr. Raghavendra Doddamani, Dr. Jyothi S.D, & Dr. TejaswiVittalPujar. (2018). Interpretation of low birth weight babies by anthropometric measurements in South India. Pediatric Review: International Journal of Pediatric Research, 5(7), 368-374. https://doi.org/10.17511/ijpr.2018.i07.05
Section
Original Article