A profile of birth defects in a tertiary care center and focus on preventable causes: a cross sectional observational study

  • Dr. Chandra Mohan Chekkali Niloufer Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
  • Dr. Greeshma Reddy Kankanala Niloufer Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
  • Dr. Rakesh Kotha Niloufer Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
  • Dr. Himabindu Singh Niloufer Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Keywords: Birth defects, Neonate, Congenital anomalies, Malformations, Epigenitics

Abstract

Introduction: Birth defects may be defined as “all structural, biochemical and functional disorder present at birth”. The worldwide incidence of congenital malformations is estimated at 15 –30 per 1000 births. Congenital malformation is already the leading cause of infant mortality in United States. In India prevalence is about 60 to 70 per 1000 live births. Epidemiological studies of specific congenital malformations will provide information for the planning, provision and evaluation of health services. That’s why in this study we want to evaluate clinical profile of birth defects. We also focused on preventable causes of congenital anomalies

Aim: To know the profile of birth defects among the newborns born in a tertiary care center and look for the preventable causes associated with birth defects.

Methodology: cross-sectional prospective observational study done during 2018 September to 2019 September done at Niloufer hospital Hyderabad. In the present study only intramural babies were included, both live and still born babies were included. Statistical analysis done by SPSS version 20.

Results: Incidence of congenital anomalies in the present study is 22.43 per 1000 births. Central nervous system malformation is found to be the commonest malformation (24.63%). Followed by cardiovascular malformations (20.15%), Gastrointestinal system (17.91%) and musculoskeletal system (17.91%). Among the central nervous system malformations spina bifida (44.48%) was found to be the commonest malformation. The incidence of CNS malformation was 6.16 per 1000 births. In cardiovascular system ventricular septal defects, in gastrointestinal system cleft lip and palate and in musculoskeletal system congenital talipes equino varus were the most common birth defects.

Conclusion: Most common congenital anomaly in our hospital was central nervous system malformations followed by cardiovascular system. One of the major portions of birth defects were caused by preventable casues.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Holtzman NA, Khoury MJ. Monitoring for congenital malformations. Annu Rev Public Health. 1986; 7:237-266. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.07.050186. 001321

2. Centres for Disease Control. Contribution of birth defects to infant mortality – United States 1986. Morbid Mortal Week Rep. 1989;38:633-635

3. Sharma R. Birth defects in India: Hidden truth, need for urgent attention. Indian J Human Genet. 2013; 19 (2):125. doi: 10.4103/0971-6866.116101

4. Patel ZM, Adhia RA. Birth defects surveillance study. Indian J Pediatr. 2005;72(6):489-491.

5. Bhat BV, Babu L. Congenital malformations at birth--a prospective study from south India. Indian J Pediatr. 1998;65(6):873-881. doi: 10.1007/bf02831352.

6. Neelambari YC, Das P, Srinivasan Sadagopan AN. Prevalence, pattern and outcome of congenital malformations in a tertiary care centre in South India. Int J Contemp Pediat. 2018;5(3):1044-1048.doi: http: //dx. doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20181539

7. Verma M, Chhatwal J, Singh D. Congenital malformations--a retrospective study of 10,000 cases. Indian J Pediatr. 1991;58(2):245-252. doi: 10.1007/bf 02751129

8. Agarwal SS, Singh U, Singh PS, Singh SS, Das V, Sharma A, et al. Prevalence & spectrum of congenital malformations in a prospective study at a teaching hospital. Indian J Med Res. 1991;94:413-419.

9. Grover N. Congenital malformations in Shimla. Indian J Pediatr. 2000;67(4):249-251. doi: 10.1007/bf 02758158.

10. Tapan pattanaik, Sunita Samal, Tanaya Jena et,al. Prevalence and Spectrum of Congenital Malformations in a Tertiary Care Centre Ind J Neonat Med Res. 2016;4 (3): 1-4. doi: 10.7860/IJNMR/2016/20253.2173.

11. Chaturvedi P, Banerjee KS. An epidemiological study of congenital malformations in newborn. Indian J Pediatr. 1993;60(5):645-653. doi: 10.1007/bf02821727.

12. Taksande A, Vilhekar K, Chaturvedi P, Jain M. Congenital malformations at birth in Central India: A rural medical college hospital-based data. Ind J Human Genet. 2010; 16(3): 159-163.doi: 10.4103/ 0971-6866. 73412

13. Ronya R, Gupta D, Ghosh SK, Narang R, Jain KB. Spectrum of congenital surgical malformations in newborns. J Indian Med Assoc. 2002;100(9):565-566.

14. Mishra PC, Baveja R. Congenital malformations in the newborn--a prospective study. Indian Pediatr. 1989; 26 (1):32-35.
CITATION
DOI: 10.17511/ijpr.2019.i09.06
Published: 2019-09-30
How to Cite
Dr. Chandra Mohan Chekkali, Dr. Greeshma Reddy Kankanala, Dr. Rakesh Kotha, & Dr. Himabindu Singh. (2019). A profile of birth defects in a tertiary care center and focus on preventable causes: a cross sectional observational study. Pediatric Review: International Journal of Pediatric Research, 6(9), 474-480. https://doi.org/10.17511/ijpr.2019.i09.06
Section
Original Article